Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userA Novel Machine Learning Based Approach for Post-OCR Error Detection
نهج بناء على آلة التعلم الجديد للكشف عن خطأ ما بعد التعرف عبر الإنترنت
313
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
معالجة البريد هي النهج الأكثر تقليدية لتصحيح الأخطاء التي تسببها أنظمة التعرف على الأحرف البصرية (OCR).يتم اتخاذ خطوتين عادة لتصحيح أخطاء تعض عبر الإنترنت: الكشف والتصحيحات.بالنسبة للمهمة الأولى، أظهرت طرق تعلم الآلات الخاضعة للإشراف عروضا حديثة.تركزت النهج المقترحة في السابق بشكل بارز على الجمع بين الميزات المعجمية والسياقية والإحصائية للكشف عن الأخطاء.في هذه الدراسة، نبلغ عن نظام رواية للكشف عن الأخطاء وهو ما يعتمد فقط على التهم N-Gram من رمز المرشح.بالإضافة إلى كونها بسيطة وأقل تكلفة حسابية، فإن نظامنا المقترح يدق النظم السابقة المبلغ عنها في مسابقة ICDAR2019 على اكتشاف خطأ OCR مع هوامش ملحوظة.حققنا درجات F1 الحديثة لمدة ثمانية من أصل عشر لغات أوروبية.الحد الأقصى للتحسين هو الإسبانية التي تحسنت من 0.69 إلى 0.90، والحد الأدنى للبولندية من 0.82 إلى 0.84.
Post processing is the most conventional approach for correcting errors that are caused by Optical Character Recognition(OCR) systems. Two steps are usually taken to correct OCR errors: detection and corrections. For the first task, supervised machine learning methods have shown state-of-the-art performances. Previously proposed approaches have focused most prominently on combining lexical, contextual and statistical features for detecting errors. In this study, we report a novel system to error detection which is based merely on the n-gram counts of a candidate token. In addition to being simple and computationally less expensive, our proposed system beats previous systems reported in the ICDAR2019 competition on OCR-error detection with notable margins. We achieved state-of-the-art F1-scores for eight out of the ten involved European languages. The maximum improvement is for Spanish which improved from 0.69 to 0.90, and the minimum for Polish from 0.82 to 0.84.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research
Read More
Substantial amounts of work are required to clean large collections of digitized books for NLP analysis, both because of the presence of errors in the scanned text and the presence of duplicate volumes in the corpora. In this paper, we consider the i
ssue of deduplication in the presence of optical character recognition (OCR) errors. We present methods to handle these errors, evaluated on a collection of 19,347 texts from the Project Gutenberg dataset and 96,635 texts from the HathiTrust Library. We demonstrate that improvements in language models now enable the detection and correction of OCR errors without consideration of the scanning image itself. The inconsistencies found by aligning pairs of scans of the same underlying work provides training data to build models for detecting and correcting errors. We identify the canonical version for each of 17,136 repeatedly-scanned books from 58,808 scans. Finally, we investigate methods to detect and correct errors in single-copy texts. We show that on average, our method corrects over six times as many errors as it introduces. We also provide interesting analysis on the relation between scanning quality and other factors such as location and publication year.
Giving feedback to students is not just about marking their answers as correct or incorrect, but also finding mistakes in their thought process that led them to that incorrect answer. In this paper, we introduce a machine learning technique for mista
ke captioning, a task that attempts to identify mistakes and provide feedback meant to help learners correct these mistakes. We do this by training a sequence-to-sequence network to generate this feedback based on domain experts. To evaluate this system, we explore how it can be used on a Linguistics assignment studying Grimm's Law. We show that our approach generates feedback that outperforms a baseline on a set of automated NLP metrics. In addition, we perform a series of case studies in which we examine successful and unsuccessful system outputs.
Online reviews are an essential aspect of online shopping for both customers and retailers. However, many reviews found on the Internet lack in quality, informativeness or helpfulness. In many cases, they lead the customers towards positive or negati
ve opinions without providing any concrete details (e.g., very poor product, I would not recommend it). In this work, we propose a novel unsupervised method for quantifying helpfulness leveraging the availability of a corpus of reviews. In particular, our method exploits three characteristics of the reviews, viz., relevance, emotional intensity and specificity, towards quantifying helpfulness. We perform three rankings (one for each feature above), which are then combined to obtain a final helpfulness ranking. For the purpose of empirically evaluating our method, we use review of four product categories from Amazon review. The experimental evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of our method in comparison to a recent and state-of-the-art baseline.
This paper offers a comparative evaluation of four commercial ASR systems which are evaluated according to the post-editing effort required to reach publishable'' quality and according to the number of errors they produce. For the error annotation ta
sk, an original error typology for transcription errors is proposed. This study also seeks to examine whether there is a difference in the performance of these systems between native and non-native English speakers. The experimental results suggest that among the four systems, Trint obtains the best scores. It is also observed that most systems perform noticeably better with native speakers and that all systems are most prone to fluency errors.
We address the task of automatic hate speech detection for low-resource languages. Rather than collecting and annotating new hate speech data, we show how to use cross-lingual transfer learning to leverage already existing data from higher-resource l
anguages. Using bilingual word embeddings based classifiers we achieve good performance on the target language by training only on the source dataset. Using our transferred system we bootstrap on unlabeled target language data, improving the performance of standard cross-lingual transfer approaches. We use English as a high resource language and German as the target language for which only a small amount of annotated corpora are available. Our results indicate that cross-lingual transfer learning together with our approach to leverage additional unlabeled data is an effective way of achieving good performance on low-resource target languages without the need for any target-language annotations.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
