Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userOn New Physical Reality (on Psi--ether)
71
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
P.S. Isaev
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
It is shown that there exists a new physical reality -- the $Psi$--ether. All the achievements of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory are due to the fact that both the theories include the influence of $Psi$--ether on the physical processes occurring in the Universe. Physics of the XXth century was first of all the physics of $Psi$--ether.
rate research
Read More
A hidden variables model complying with the simplest form of Local Realism was recently introduced, which reproduces Quantum Mechanics predictions for an even ideally perfect Bells experiment. This is possible thanks to the use of a non-Boolean vector hidden variable. Yet, that model is as far as Quantum Mechanics from the goal of providing a complete description of physical reality in the EPR-sense. Such complete description includes the capacity to calculate, from the values taken by the hidden variables, the time values when particles are detected. This can be achieved by replacing Borns rule (which allow calculating only probabilities) with a deterministic condition for particle detection. The simplest choice is a threshold condition on the hidden variables. However, in order to test this choice, a new type of quantum (or wave, or non-Boolean) computer is necessary. This new type of quantum computer does not exist yet, not even in theory. In this paper, a classical (Boolean) computer code is presented which mimics the operation of that new type of quantum computer by using contextual instructions. These instructions take into account a consequence of the principle of superposition (which is a typical vector, i.e. non-Boolean, feature). Numerical results generated by the mimicking code are analyzed. They illustrate the features the hypothetical new type of quantum computers output may have, and show how and why some intuitive assumptions about Bells experiment fail.
The ether concept -- abandoned for a long time but reinstated by Dirac in 1951-1953 -- has in recent years emerged into a fashionable subject in theoretical physics, now usually with the name of the Einstein-Dirac ether. It means that one special inertial frame is singled out, as the rest frame. What is emphasized in the present note, is that the idea is a natural example of the covariant theory of quantum electrodynamics in media if the refractive index is set equal to unity. A treatise on this case of quantum electrodynamics was given by the present author back in 1971, published then only within a preprint series. The present version is a brief summary of that formalism, with a link to the original paper. We think it is one of the first treatises on modern ether theory.
There are (at least) four ways that an agent can acquire information concerning the state of the universe: via observation, control, prediction, or via retrodiction, i.e., memory. Each of these four ways of acquiring information seems to rely on a different kind of physical device (resp., an observation device, a control device, etc.). However it turns out that certain mathematical structure is common to those four types of device. Any device that possesses a certain subset of that structure is known as an inference device (ID). Here I review some of the properties of IDs, including their relation with Turing machines, and (more loosely) quantum mechanics. I also review the bounds of the joint abilities of any set of IDs to know facts about the physical universe that contains them. These bounds constrain the possible properties of any universe that contains agents who can acquire information concerning that universe. I then extend this previous work on IDs, by adding to the definition of IDs some of the other mathematical structure that is common to the four ways of acquiring information about the universe but is not captured in the (minimal) definition of IDs. I discuss these extensions of IDs in the context of epistemic logic (especially possible worlds formalisms like Kripke structures and Aumann structures). In particular, I show that these extensions of IDs are not subject to the problem of logical omniscience that plagues many previously studied forms of epistemic logic.
In a recent article [1] we have explored alternative decompositions of the Lorentz transformation by adopting the synchronization convention of the target frame at the end and alternately at the outset. In this note we develop the decomposition by assuming a correct universal synchronization that may be outside the two inertial frames that are involved.
We analyze the attempt by C. Corda to explain the results of modern Moessbauer experiments in a rotating system via the additional effect of synchronization of the clock in the origin of the rotating system with the laboratory clock, and indicate errors committed by him.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
