Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userTowards Optimal Use of Exception Handling Information for Function Detection
126
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Chengbin Pang
Publication date
2021
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Function entry detection is critical for security of binary code. Conventional methods heavily rely on patterns, inevitably missing true functions and introducing errors. Recently, call frames have been used in exception-handling for function start detection. However, existing methods have two problems. First, they combine call frames with heuristic-based approaches, which often brings error and uncertain benefits. Second, they trust the fidelity of call frames, without handling the errors that are introduced by call frames. In this paper, we first study the coverage and accuracy of existing approaches in detecting function starts using call frames. We found that recursive disassembly with call frames can maximize coverage, and using extra heuristic-based approaches does not improve coverage and actually hurts accuracy. Second, we unveil call-frame errors and develop the first approach to fix them, making their use more reliable.
rate research
Read More
In modern programming languages, exception handling is an effective mechanism to avoid unexpected runtime errors. Thus, failing to catch and handle exceptions could lead to serious issues like system crashing, resource leaking, or negative end-user experiences. However, writing correct exception handling code is often challenging in mobile app development due to the fast-changing nature of API libraries for mobile apps and the insufficiency of their documentation and source code examples. Our prior study shows that in practice mobile app developers cause many exception-related bugs and still use bad exception handling practices (e.g. catch an exception and do nothing). To address such problems, in this paper, we introduce two novel techniques for recommending correct exception handling code. One technique, XRank, recommends code to catch an exception likely occurring in a code snippet. The other, XHand, recommends correction code for such an occurring exception. We have developed ExAssist, a code recommendation tool for exception handling using XRank and XHand. The empirical evaluation shows that our techniques are highly effective. For example, XRank has top-1 accuracy of 70% and top-3 accuracy of 87%. XHands results are 89% and 96%, respectively.
Diagnostic data such as logs and memory dumps from production systems are often shared with development teams to do root cause analysis of system crashes. Invariably such diagnostic data contains sensitive information and sharing it can lead to data leaks. To handle this problem we present Knowledge and Learning-based Adaptable System for Sensitive InFormation Identification and Handling (KLASSIFI) which is an end to end system capable of identifying and redacting sensitive information present in diagnostic data. KLASSIFI is highly customizable, allowing it to be used for various different business use cases by simply changing the configuration. KLASSIFI ensures that the output file is useful by retaining the metadata which is used by various debugging tools. Various optimizations have been done to improve the performance of KLASSIFI. Empirical evaluation of KLASSIFI shows that it is able to process large files (128 GB) in 84 minutes and its performance scales linearly with varying factors. This points to practicability of KLASSIFI
A common goal in the areas of secure information flow and privacy is to build effective defenses against unwanted leakage of information. To this end, one must be able to reason about potential attacks and their interplay with possible defenses. In this paper, we propose a game-theoretic framework to formalize strategies of attacker and defender in the context of information leakage, and provide a basis for developing optimal defense methods. A novelty of our games is that their utility is given by information leakage, which in some cases may behave in a non-linear way. This causes a significant deviation from classic game theory, in which utility functions are linear with respect to players strategies. Hence, a key contribution of this paper is the establishment of the foundations of information leakage games. We consider two kinds of games, depending on the notion of leakage considered. The first kind, the QIF-games, is tailored for the theory of quantitative information flow (QIF). The second one, the DP-games, corresponds to differential privacy (DP).
Recently, coordinated attack campaigns started to become more widespread on the Internet. In May 2017, WannaCry infected more than 300,000 machines in 150 countries in a few days and had a large impact on critical infrastructure. Existing threat sharing platforms cannot easily adapt to emerging attack patterns. At the same time, enterprises started to adopt machine learning-based threat detection tools in their local networks. In this paper, we pose the question: emph{What information can defenders share across multiple networks to help machine learning-based threat detection adapt to new coordinated attacks?} We propose three information sharing methods across two networks, and show how the shared information can be used in a machine-learning network-traffic model to significantly improve its ability of detecting evasive self-propagating malware.
Since the advent of SPECTRE, a number of countermeasures have been proposed and deployed. Rigorously reasoning about their effectiveness, however, requires a well-defined notion of security against speculative execution attacks, which has been missing until now. In this paper (1) we put forward speculative non-interference, the first semantic notion of security against speculative execution attacks, and (2) we develop SPECTECTOR, an algorithm based on symbolic execution to automatically prove speculative non-interference, or to detect violations. We implement SPECTECTOR in a tool, which we use to detect subtle leaks and optimizations opportunities in the way major compilers place SPECTRE countermeasures. A scalability analysis indicates that checking speculative non-interference does not exhibit fundamental bottlenecks beyond those inherited by symbolic execution.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
