Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userSymmetries and regularity for holomorphic maps between balls
126
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Let $f:{mathbb B}^n to {mathbb B}^N$ be a holomorphic map. We study subgroups $Gamma_f subseteq {rm Aut}({mathbb B}^n)$ and $T_f subseteq {rm Aut}({mathbb B}^N)$. When $f$ is proper, we show both these groups are Lie subgroups. When $Gamma_f$ contains the center of ${bf U}(n)$, we show that $f$ is spherically equivalent to a polynomial. When $f$ is minimal we show that there is a homomorphism $Phi:Gamma_f to T_f$ such that $f$ is equivariant with respect to $Phi$. To do so, we characterize minimality via the triviality of a third group $H_f$. We relate properties of ${rm Ker}(Phi)$ to older results on invariant proper maps between balls. When $f$ is proper but completely non-rational, we show that either both $Gamma_f$ and $T_f$ are finite or both are noncompact.
rate research
Read More
We make several new contributions to the study of proper holomorphic mappings between balls. Our results include a degree estimate for rational proper maps, a new gap phenomenon for convex families of arbitrary proper maps, and an interesting result about inverse images.
Let $mathcal{G}$ resp. $M$ be a positive dimensional Lie group resp. connected complex manifold without boundary and $V$ a finite dimensional $C^{infty}$ compact connected manifold, possibly with boundary. Fix a smoothness class $mathcal{F}=C^{infty}$, Holder $C^{k, alpha}$ or Sobolev $W^{k, p}$. The space $mathcal{F}(V, mathcal{G})$ resp. $mathcal{F}(V, M)$ of all $mathcal{F}$ maps $V to mathcal{G}$ resp. $V to M$ is a Banach/Frechet Lie group resp. complex manifold. Let $mathcal{F}^0(V, mathcal{G})$ resp. $mathcal{F}^{0}(V, M)$ be the component of $mathcal{F}(V, mathcal{G})$ resp. $mathcal{F}(V, M)$ containing the identity resp. constants. A map $f$ from a domain $Omega subset mathcal{F}_1(V, M)$ to $mathcal{F}_2(W, M)$ is called range decreasing if $f(x)(W) subset x(V)$, $x in Omega$. We prove that if $dim_{mathbb{R}} mathcal{G} ge 2$, then any range decreasing group homomorphism $f: mathcal{F}_1^0(V, mathcal{G}) to mathcal{F}_2(W, mathcal{G})$ is the pullback by a map $phi: W to V$. We also provide several sufficient conditions for a range decreasing holomorphic map $Omega$ $to$ $mathcal{F}_2(W, M)$ to be a pullback operator. Then we apply these results to study certain decomposition of holomorphic maps $mathcal{F}_1(V, N) supset Omega to mathcal{F}_2(W, M)$. In particular, we identify some classes of holomorphic maps $mathcal{F}_1^{0}(V, mathbb{P}^n) to mathcal{F}_2(W, mathbb{P}^m)$, including all automorphisms of $mathcal{F}^{0}(V, mathbb{P}^n)$.
We construct a complete proper holomorphic embedding from any strictly pseudoconvex domain with $mathcal{C}^2$-boundary in $mathbb{C}^n$ into the unit ball of $mathbb{C}^N$, for $N$ large enough, thereby answering a question of Alarcon and Forstneric.
We survey recent work and announce new results concerning two singular integral operators whose kernels are holomorphic functions of the output variable, specifically the Cauchy-Leray integral and the Cauchy-SzegH o projection associated to various classes of bounded domains in $mathbb C^n$ with $ngeq 2$.
68 -
P.G. Grinevich L.D. Landau Institute forn Theoretical Physics
, Lomonosov Moscow State University
2015
We continue the studies of Moutard-type transform for generalized analytic functions started in our previous paper: arXiv:1510.08764. In particular, we suggest an interpretation of generalized analytic functions as spinor fields and show that in the framework of this approach Moutard-type transforms for the aforementioned functions commute with holomorphic changes of variables.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
