Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userModeling the effect of small-scale magnetic turbulence on the X-ray properties of Pulsar Wind Nebulae
91
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Niccolo' Bucciantini Dr.
Publication date
2017
fields
Physics
and research's language is
English
Authors
N. Bucciantini
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Pulsar Wind Nebulae (PWNe) constitute an ideal astrophysical environment to test our current understanding of relativistic plasma processes. It is well known that magnetic fields play a crucial role in their dynamics and emission properties. At present, one of the main issues concerns the level of magnetic turbulence present in these systems, which in the absence of space resolved X-ray polarization measures cannot be directly constrained. In this work we investigate, for the first time using simulated synchrotron maps, the effect of a small scale fluctuating component of the magnetic field on the emission properties in X-ray. We illustrate how to include the effects of a turbulent component in standard emission models for PWNe, and which consequences are expected in terms of net emissivity and depolarization, showing that the X-ray surface brightness maps can provide already some rough constraints. We then apply our analysis to the Crab and Vela nebulae and, by comparing our model with Chandra and Vela data, we found that the typical energies in the turbulent component of the magnetic field are about 1.5 to 3 times the one in the ordered field.
rate research
Read More
During the search for counterparts of very-high-energy gamma-ray sources, we serendipitously discovered large, extended, low surface brightness emission from PWNe around pulsars with the ages up to ~100 kyrs, a discovery made possible by the low and stable background of the Suzaku X-ray satellite. A systematic study of a sample of 8 of these PWNe, together with Chandra datasets, has revealed us that the nebulae keep expanding up to for ~100 kyrs, although time scale of the synchrotron X-ray emission is only ~60 yr for typical magnetic fields of 100 microG. Our result suggests that the accelerated electrons up to ~80 TeV can escape from the PWNe without losing most energies. Moreover, in order to explain the observed correlation between the X-ray size and the pulsar spindwon age, the magnetic field strength in the PWNe must decrease with time.
Magnetic spin-down of a millisecond neutron star has been proposed as the power source of hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae (SLSNe-I). However, producing an unambiguous test that can distinguish this model from alternatives, such as circumstellar interaction, has proven challenging. After the supernova explosion, the pulsar wind inflates a hot cavity behind the expanding stellar ejecta: the nascent millisecond pulsar wind nebula. Electron/positron pairs injected by the wind cool through inverse Compton scattering and synchrotron emission, producing a pair cascade and hard X-ray spectrum inside the nebula. These X-rays ionize the inner exposed side of the ejecta, driving an ionization front that propagates outwards with time. Under some conditions this front can breach the ejecta surface within months after the optical supernova peak, allowing ~0.1-1 keV photons to escape the nebula unattenuated with a characteristic luminosity L_X ~ 1e43-1e45 erg/s. This ionization break-out may explain the luminous X-ray emission observed from the transient SCP 06F, providing direct evidence that this SLSN was indeed engine-powered. Luminous break-out requires a low ejecta mass and that the spin-down time of the pulsar be comparable to the photon diffusion timescale at optical maximum, the latter condition similar to that required for a supernova with a high optical fluence. These relatively special requirements may explain why most SLSNe-I are not accompanied by detectable X-ray emission. Global asymmetry of the supernova ejecta increases the likelihood of an early break-out along the direction of lowest density. Atomic states with lower threshold energies are more readily ionized at earlier times near optical maximum, allowing UV break-out across a wider range of pulsar and ejecta properties than X-ray break-out, possibly contributing to the blue/UV colors of SLSNe-I.
To look for possible phenomenological connections between pulsars timing properties and emissions from pulsar wind nebulae and their pulsars, we studied the power-law component of the X-ray emissions from 35 pulsar wind nebulae which have a detected pulsar in X-rays. Our major results are in the following: (1) The power-law component of the X-ray luminosities, in the energy range from 0.5 keV to 8 keV, of the nebulae and of the pulsar both show a strong correlation with the pulsar spin-down power ($dot{E}$), consistent with earlier studies. However, equally significant correlations with the magnetic field strength at the light cylinder ($B_{rm lc}$) are also found. The similar significance level of the correlations with $dot{E}$ and with $B_{rm lc}$ suggests that not only $dot{E}$ but also $B_{rm lc}$ plays an important role in understanding these power-law emissions. (2) Thermal X-ray emissions are detected in 12 pulsars among the 35 samples. With derived temperature as one additional variable, we found that the photon indices of pulsars non-thermal X-ray power-law spectra can be well described by a linear function of $log P$, $logdot{P}$ and temperature logarithm $log T$. It indicates that the surface temperature of neutron stars plays an important role in determining the energy distribution of the radiating pair plasma in pulsars magnetospheres.
The discovery of extended TeV emission around the Geminga and PSR B0656+14 pulsars, with properties consistent with free particle propagation in the interstellar medium (ISM), has sparked considerable discussion on the possible presence of such halos in other systems. Here we make an assessment of the current TeV source population associated with energetic pulsars, in terms of size and estimated energy density. Based on two alternative estimators we conclude that a large majority of the known TeV sources have emission originating in the zone energetically and dynamically dominated by the pulsar (i.e. the pulsar wind nebula), rather than from a halo of particles diffusing in to the ISM. Furthermore, whilst the number of established halos will surely increase in the future, we find that it is unlikely that such halos contribute significantly to the total TeV $gamma$-ray luminosity from electrons accelerated in PWN.
We investigate the time-dependent behavior of Crab-like pulsar wind nebulae (PWNe) generating a set of models using 4 different initial spin-down luminosities ($L_0 ={1,0.1,0.01,0.001} times L_{0, {rm Crab}}$), 8 values of magnetic fraction ($eta =$ 0.001, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.5, 0.9, 0.99, and 0.999, i.e., from fully particle dominated to fully magnetically dominated nebulae), and 3 distinctive ages: 940, 3000, and 9000 years. We find that the self-synchrotron Compton (SSC) contribution is irrelevant for $L_{SD}$=0.1, 1, and 10% of the Crab power, disregarding the age and the magnetic fraction. SSC only becomes relevant for highly energetic ($sim 70%$ of the Crab), particle dominated nebulae at low ages (of less than a few kyr), located in a FIR background with relatively low energy density. Since no pulsar other than Crab is known to have these features, these results clarify why the Crab Nebula, and only it, is SSC dominated. No young PWN would be detectable at TeV energies if the pulsars spin-down power is 0.1% Crab or lower. For 1% of the Crab spin-down, only particle dominated nebulae can be detected by H.E.S.S.-like telescopes when young enough (with details depending on the precise injection and environmental parameters). Above 10% of the Crabs power, all PWNe are detectable by H.E.S.S.-like telescopes if they are particle dominated, no matter the age. The impact of the magnetic fraction on the final SED is varied and important, generating order of magnitude variations in the luminosity output for systems that are otherwise the same (equal $P$, $dot P$, injection, and environment).
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
