No Arabic abstract
One of the fundamental cellular processes governed by genetic regulatory networks in cells is the transition among different states under the intrinsic and extrinsic noise. Based on a two-state genetic switching model with positive feedback, we develop a framework to understand the metastability in gene expressions. This framework is comprised of identifying the transition path, reconstructing the global quasi-potential energy landscape, analyzing the uphill and downhill transition paths, etc. It is successfully utilized to investigate the stability of genetic switching models and fluctuation properties in different regimes of gene expression with positive feedback. The quasi-potential energy landscape, which is the rationalized version of Waddington potential, provides a quantitative tool to understand the metastability in more general biological processes with intrinsic noise.
Motivated by the famous Waddingtons epigenetic landscape metaphor in developmental biology, biophysicists and applied mathematicians made different proposals to realize this metaphor in a rationalized way. We adopt comprehensive perspectives to systematically investigate three different but closely related realizations in recent literature: namely the potential landscape theory from the steady state distribution of stochastic differential equations (SDEs), the quasi-potential from the large deviation theory, and the construction through SDE decomposition and A-type integral.The connections among these theories are established in this paper. We demonstrate that the quasi-potential is the zero noise limit of the potential landscape. We also show that the potential function in the third proposal coincides with the quasi-potential. The most probable transition path by minimizing the Onsager-Machlup or Freidlin-Wentzell action functional is discussed as well. Furthermore, we compare the difference between local and global quasi-potential through the exchange of limit order for time and noise amplitude. As a consequence of such explorations, we arrive at the existence result for the SDE decomposition while deny its uniqueness in general cases. It is also clarified that the A-type integral is more appropriate to be applied to the decomposed SDEs rather than the original one. Our results contribute to a better understanding of existing landscape theories for biological systems.
Cells use genetic switches to shift between alternate stable gene expression states, e.g., to adapt to new environments or to follow a developmental pathway. Conceptually, these stable phenotypes can be considered as attractive states on an epigenetic landscape with phenotypic changes being transitions between states. Measuring these transitions is challenging because they are both very rare in the absence of appropriate signals and very fast. As such, it has proven difficult to experimentally map the epigenetic landscapes that are widely believed to underly developmental networks. Here, we introduce a new nonequilibrium perturbation method to help reconstruct a regulatory networks epigenetic landscape. We derive the mathematical theory needed and then use the method on simulated data to reconstruct the landscapes. Our results show that with a relatively small number of perturbation experiments it is possible to recover an accurate representation of the true epigenetic landscape. We propose that our theory provides a general method by which epigenetic landscapes can be studied. Finally, our theory suggests that the total perturbation impulse required to induce a switch between metastable states is a fundamental quantity in developmental dynamics.
We study a class of growth algorithms for directed graphs that are candidate models for the evolution of genetic regulatory networks. The algorithms involve partial duplication of nodes and their links, together with innovation of new links, allowing for the possibility that input and output links from a newly created node may have different probabilities of survival. We find some counterintuitive trends as parameters are varied, including the broadening of indegree distribution when the probability for retaining input links is decreased. We also find that both the scaling of transcription factors with genome size and the measured degree distributions for genes in yeast can be reproduced by the growth algorithm if and only if a special seed is used to initiate the process.
Does regulation in the genome use collective behavior, similar to the way the brain or deep neural networks operate? Here I make the case for why having a genomic network capable of a high level of computation would be strongly selected for, and suggest how it might arise from biochemical processes that succeed in regulating in a collective manner, very different than the usual way we think about genetic regulation.
Gene expression levels carry information about signals that have functional significance for the organism. Using the gap gene network in the fruit fly embryo as an example, we show how this information can be decoded, building a dictionary that translates expression levels into a map of implied positions. The optimal decoder makes use of graded variations in absolute expression level, resulting in positional estimates that are precise to ~1% of the embryos length. We test this optimal decoder by analyzing gap gene expression in embryos lacking some of the primary maternal inputs to the network. The resulting maps are distorted, and these distortions predict, with no free parameters, the positions of expression stripes for the pair-rule genes in the mutant embryos.