Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe Evolution and Development of the Universe
135
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
This document is the Special Issue of the First International Conference on the Evolution and Development of the Universe (EDU 2008). Please refer to the preface and introduction for more details on the contributions. Keywords: acceleration, artificial cosmogenesis, artificial life, Big Bang, Big History, biological evolution, biological universe, biology, causality, classical vacuum energy, complex systems, complexity, computational universe, conscious evolution, cosmological artificial selection, cosmological natural selection, cosmology, critique, cultural evolution, dark energy, dark matter, development of the universe, development, emergence, evolution of the universe evolution, exobiology, extinction, fine-tuning, fractal space-time, fractal, information, initial conditions, intentional evolution, linear expansion of the universe, log-periodic laws, macroevolution, materialism, meduso-anthropic principle, multiple worlds, natural sciences, Nature, ontology, order, origin of the universe, particle hierarchy, philosophy, physical constants, quantum darwinism, reduction, role of intelligent life, scale relativity, scientific evolution, self-organization, speciation, specification hierarchy, thermodynamics, time, universe, vagueness.
rate research
Read More
The cosmological constant $Lambda$ is a free parameter in Einsteins equations of gravity. We propose to fix its value with a boundary condition: test particles should be free when outside causal contact, e.g. at infinity. Under this condition, we show that constant vacuum energy does not change cosmic expansion and there can not be cosmic acceleration for an infinitely large and uniform Universe. The observed acceleration requires either a large Universe with evolving Dark Energy (DE) and equation of state $omega>-1$ or a finite causal boundary (that we call Causal Universe) without DE. The former cant explain why $Omega_Lambda simeq 2.3 Omega_m$ today, something that comes naturally with a finite Causal Universe. This boundary condition, combined with the anomalous lack of correlations observed above 60 degrees in the CMB predicts $Omega_Lambda simeq 0.70$ for a flat universe, with independence of any other measurements. This solution provides new clues and evidence for inflation and removes the need for Dark Energy or Modified Gravity.
A Universe with finite age also has a finite causal scale. Larger scales can not affect our local measurements or modeling, but far away locations could have different cosmological parameters. The size of our causal Universe depends on the details of inflation and is usually assumed to be larger than our observable Universe today. To account for causality, we propose a new boundary condition, that can be fulfill by fixing the cosmological constant (a free geometric parameter of gravity). This forces a cancellation of vacuum energy with the cosmological constant. As a consequence, the measured cosmic acceleration can not be explained by a simple cosmological constant or constant vacuum energy. We need some additional odd properties such as the existence of evolving dark energy (DE) with energy-density fine tuned to be twice that of dark matter today. We show here that we can instead explain cosmic acceleration without DE (or modified gravity) assuming that the causal scale is smaller than the observable Universe today. Such scale corresponds to half the sky at z=1 and 60 degrees at z=1100, which is consistent with the anomalous lack of correlations observed in the CMB. Late time cosmic acceleration could then be interpreted as the smoking gun of primordial Inflation.
From the observed results of the space distribution of quasars we deduced that neutrino mass is about 10^(-1) eV. The fourth stable elementary particle (delta particle) with mass about 10^(0) eV can help explain the energy resource mechanism in quasars, cosmic ultra-high energy particles, as well as the flatness of spiral galaxy rotation curves. The blue bump and IR bump in the quasar irradiation spectra, as well as the peaks of EBL (Extra-galactic Background Light) around 10^(0) eV and 10^(-1) eV, are related to the annihilation of delta particle with anti-delta particle and neutrino with anti-neutrino respectively. This enlightens us to explore the reason for missing solar neutrinos and the unlimited energy resource in a new manner. For delta-particle search it is related to Dual SM or Two-fold SM; the relationship between space electron spectrum (>10^(0)Tev) and cosmic ray spectrum (knee and ankle) at high energy region; and the characteristics of spherical universe. Appendix is the theory part, which related to mass tree, inflation, BSM, finite universe.
An extended framework of gravity, in which the first Friedmann equation is satisfied up to some constant due to violation of gauge invariance, is tested against astrophysical data: Supernovae Type-Ia, Cosmic Chronometers, and Gamma-ray bursts. A generalized expression for the Friedmann equation, including the possible vacuum contributions, is suggested, and two particular cosmological models with two independent parameters are considered within this framework and compared on the basis of the likelihood analysis. One of the models considered includes contribution of the residual vacuum fluctuations to the energy density and places the limit on the UV cutoff scale as $k_{max} = 12.43^{+0.9}_{-1.6} [M_p/sqrt{2+N_{sc}}]$, where $N_{sc}$ is the number of minimally coupled scalar fields. Model comparison using the Akaike information criteria and Bayesian evidence shows a preference for the conventional $Lambda$CDM over the extended models. A more general model with three parameters is considered within which an anti-correlated behavior between the dynamical vacuum fluctuations contribution and a negative cosmological constant was found. The result is an upper limit of $Omega_{Lambda} lesssim -0.14$ at $95%$ C.L., which is only mildly disfavored ($lnmathcal{B} = -1.8$) with respect to $Lambda$CDM.
We make an estimation of the mass of the universe by considering the behavior of a very special test particle when described both by using the Newtonian mechanics as well through a scalar field theory of the Yukawa kind. Naturally, Hubbles law is also taken in account.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
