Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userAn XMM-Newton study of the X-ray binary MXB1659-298 and the discovery of narrow X-ray absorption lines
65
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
L. Sidoli
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We report the discovery of narrow X-ray absorption lines from the low-mass X-ray binary MXB1659-298 during an XMM-Newton observation in 2001 February. The 7.1 hr orbital cycle is clearly evident with narrow X-ray eclipses preceded by intense dipping activity. A sinusoid-like OM $B$-band modulation with a peak-to-peak modulation of 0.5 magnitude and a minimum coincident with the X-ray eclipse is visible. EPIC and RGS spectra reveal the presence of narrow resonant absorption features identified with OVIII 1s-2p, 1s-3p and 1s-4p, NeX 1s-2p, FeXXV 1s-2p, and FeXXVI 1s-2p transitions, together with a broad Fe emission feature at ~6.5 keV. The EWs of the Fe absorption features show no obvious dependence on orbital phase, even during dipping intervals. Previously, the only X-ray binaries known to exhibit narrow X-ray absorption lines were two superluminal jet sources and it had been suggested that these features are related to the jet formation mechanism. This now appears unlikely, and instead their presence may be related to the viewing angle of the system. The MXB1659-298 0.6--12 keV continuum is modeled using absorbed cutoff power-law and blackbody components. During dips the blackbody is more strongly absorbed than the power-law. The spectral shape of the 3.6% of 0.5--10 keV emission that remains during eclipses is consistent with that during non-dipping intervals.
rate research
Read More
We report on two XMM-Newton observations of the low-mass X-ray binary X 1254-690. During an XMM-Newton observation of the low-mass X-ray binary in 2001 January a deep X-ray dip was seen while in a second observation one year later no dips were evident. The 0.5-10 keV EPIC spectra from both non-dipping intervals are very similar being modeled by a disk-blackbody and a power-law continuum with additional structure around 1 keV and narrow absorption features at 7.0 keV and 8.2 keV which are identified with the K alpha and K beta absorption lines of Fe XXVI. The low-energy structure may be modeled as a 175 eV (sigma) wide emission line at ~0.95 keV. This feature is probably the same structure that was modeled as an absorption edge in an earlier BeppoSAX observation. The absorption line properties show no obvious dependence on orbital phase and are similar in both observations suggesting that the occurrence of such features is not directly related to the presence of dipping activity. Narrow Fe absorption features have been observed from the two superluminal jet sources GRO J1655-40 and GRS 1915+105, and the four low-mass X-ray binaries GX 13+1, MXB 1658-298, X 1624-490 and X 1254-690. Since the latter 3 sources are dipping sources, which are systems viewed close to the accretion disk plane, and the two microquasars are thought to be viewed at an inclination of ~70 degrees, this suggests that these features are more prominent when viewed at high-inclination angles. This, together with the lack of any orbital dependence, implies a cylindrical geometry for the absorbing material.
We report the discovery of narrow X-ray absorption features from the two dipping low-mass X-ray binary 4U 1916-053 and X 1254-690 during XMM-Newton observations. The features detected are identified with resonant scattering absorption lines of highly ionized iron (Fe XXV and Fe XXVI). Resonant absorption features are now observed in a growing number of low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs): the two superluminal jet sources GRS 1915+105 and GRO J1655-40, the bright LMXB GX 13+1 and the four dipping sources MXB 1658-298, X 1624-490, 4U 1916-053 and X 1254-690. The early hypothesis that their origin could be related to the presence of superluminal jets is thus ruled out. Ionized absorption features may be common characteristics of accreting systems. Furthermore, their presence may depend on viewing angle, as suggested by their detection in dippers which are viewed close to the disk plane, and by the fact that GRS 1915+105, GRO J1655-40 and GX 13+1, although not dippers, are suspected to be also viewed at high inclination.
We report the discovery of narrow Fe XXV and Fe XXVI K alpha X-ray absorption lines at 6.65 and 6.95 keV in the persistent emission of the dipping low-mass X-ray binary (LMXB) XB 1916-053 during an XMM-Newton observation performed in September 2002. In addition, there is marginal evidence for absorption features at 1.48 keV, 2.67 kev, 7.82 keV and 8.29 keV consistent with Mg XII, S XVI, Ni XXVII K alpha and Fe XXVI K beta transitions, respectively. Such absorption lines from highly ionized ions are now observed in a number of high inclination (ie. close to edge-on) LMXBs, such as XB 1916-053, where the inclination is estimated to be between 60-80 degrees. This, together with the lack of any orbital phase dependence of the features (except during dips), suggests that the highly ionized plasma responsible for the absorption lines is located in a cylindrical geometry around the compact object. Using the ratio of Fe XXV and Fe XXVI column densities, we estimate the photo-ionization parameter of the absorbing material to be 10^{3.92} erg cm s^{-1}. Only the Fe XXV line is observed during dipping intervals and the upper-limits to the Fe XXVI column density are consistent with a decrease in the amount of ionization during dipping intervals. This implies the presence of cooler material in the line of sight during dipping. We also report the discovery of a 0.98 keV absorption edge in the persistent emission spectrum. The edge energy decreases to 0.87 keV during deep dipping intervals. The detected feature may result from edges of moderately ionized Ne and/or Fe with the average ionization level decreasing from persistent emission to deep dipping. This is again consistent with the presence of cooler material in the line of sight during dipping.
We briefly report on an on-going spectroscopic study of hard X-ray sources selected serendipitously in 12 XMM-Newton fields. Results for the analysis of the 41 sources from the first seven EPIC observations have been discussed in a previous paper (Piconcelli et al. 2002, Paper I) where we found an absolute fraction of X-ray absorbed sources (~30%) lower than expected (~50%) by the predictions of popular CXB synthesis models at F(2-10)~5x10**(-14) erg cm**-2 s**-1. We present here the preliminary results concerning the whole sample including five new deeper XMM-Newton measurements increasing the sample to 90 sources. Even if still on-going, the present study appears to confirm and extend down to F(2-10)~10**(-14) erg cm**-2 s**-1 the above mismatch between observational data and theoretical expectations regarding the fraction of absorbed sources. Furthermore the sample average spectral index of 1.5-1.6 is steeper than the CXB slope indicating that the majority of obscured sources making the bulk of the CXB resides at even lower hard X-ray fluxes.
We present the first grating-resolution X-ray spectra of the Seyfert 1 galaxy NGC 3783, obtained with the High Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer on the Chandra X-ray Observatory. These spectra reveal many narrow absorption lines from the H-like and He-like ions of O, Ne, Mg, Si, S and Ar, as well as FeXVII-FeXXI L-shell lines. We have also identified several weak emission lines, mainly from O and Ne. The absorption lines are blueshifted by a mean velocity of approximately 440pm200 km/s and are not resolved, indicating a velocity dispersion within the absorbing gas of a few hundred km/s or less. We measure the lines equivalent widths and compare them with the predictions of photoionization models. The best-fitting model has a microturbulence velocity of 150 km/s and a hydrogen column density of 1.3times10^22 cm^-2. The measured blueshifts and inferred velocity dispersions of the X-ray absorption lines are consistent with those of the strongest UV absorption lines observed in this object. However, simple models that propose to strictly unify the X-ray and UV absorbers have difficulty explaining simultaneously the X-ray and UV absorption line strengths.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
