Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userIQ: Intrinsic measure for quantifying the heterogeneity in meta-analysis
84
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Tiejun Tong
Publication date
2021
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Quantifying the heterogeneity is an important issue in meta-analysis, and among the existing measures, the $I^2$ statistic is the most commonly used measure in the literature. In this paper, we show that the $I^2$ statistic was, in fact, defined as problematic or even completely wrong from the very beginning. To confirm this statement, we first present a motivating example to show that the $I^2$ statistic is heavily dependent on the study sample sizes, and consequently it may yield contradictory results for the amount of heterogeneity. Moreover, by drawing a connection between ANOVA and meta-analysis, the $I^2$ statistic is shown to have, mistakenly, applied the sampling errors of the estimators rather than the variances of the study populations. Inspired by this, we introduce an Intrinsic measure for Quantifying the heterogeneity in meta-analysis, and meanwhile study its statistical properties to clarify why it is superior to the existing measures. We further propose an optimal estimator, referred to as the IQ statistic, for the new measure of heterogeneity that can be readily applied in meta-analysis. Simulations and real data analysis demonstrate that the IQ statistic provides a nearly unbiased estimate of the true heterogeneity and it is also independent of the study sample sizes.
rate research
Read More
Meta-analysis combines pertinent information from existing studies to provide an overall estimate of population parameters/effect sizes, as well as to quantify and explain the differences between studies. However, testing the between-study heterogeneity is one of the most troublesome topics in meta-analysis research. Additionally, no methods have been proposed to test whether the size of the heterogeneity is larger than a specific level. The existing methods, such as the Q test and likelihood ratio (LR) tests, are criticized for their failure to control the Type I error rate and/or failure to attain enough statistical power. Although better reference distribution approximations have been proposed in the literature, the expression is complicated and the application is limited. In this article, we propose bootstrap based heterogeneity tests combining the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) ratio test or Q test with bootstrap procedures, denoted as B-REML-LRT and B-Q respectively. Simulation studies were conducted to examine and compare the performance of the proposed methods with the regular LR tests, the regular Q test, and the improved Q test in both the random-effects meta-analysis and mixed-effects meta-analysis. Based on the results of Type I error rates and statistical power, B-Q is recommended. An R package mathtt{boot.heterogeneity} is provided to facilitate the implementation of the proposed method.
We offer a non-parametric plug-in estimator for an important measure of treatment effect variability and provide minimum conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically efficient. The stratum specific treatment effect function or so-called blip function, is the average treatment effect for a randomly drawn stratum of confounders. The mean of the blip function is the average treatment effect (ATE), whereas the variance of the blip function (VTE), the main subject of this paper, measures overall clinical effect heterogeneity, perhaps providing a strong impetus to refine treatment based on the confounders. VTE is also an important measure for assessing reliability of the treatment for an individual. The CV-TMLE provides simultaneous plug-in estimates and inference for both ATE and VTE, guaranteeing asymptotic efficiency under one less condition than for TMLE. This condition is difficult to guarantee a priori, particularly when using highly adaptive machine learning that we need to employ in order to eliminate bias. Even in defiance of this condition, CV-TMLE sampling distributions maintain normality, not guaranteed for TMLE, and have a lower mean squared error than their TMLE counterparts. In addition to verifying the theoretical properties of TMLE and CV-TMLE through simulations, we point out some of the challenges in estimating VTE, which lacks double robustness and might be unavoidably biased if the true VTE is small and sample size insufficient. We will provide an application of the estimator on a data set for treatment of acute trauma patients.
A well-interpretable measure of information has been recently proposed based on a partition obtained by intersecting a random sequence with its moving average. The partition yields disjoint sets of the sequence, which are then ranked according to their size to form a probability distribution function and finally fed in the expression of the Shannon entropy. In this work, such entropy measure is implemented on the time series of prices and volatilities of six financial markets. The analysis has been performed, on tick-by-tick data sampled every minute for six years of data from 1999 to 2004, for a broad range of moving average windows and volatility horizons. The study shows that the entropy of the volatility series depends on the individual market, while the entropy of the price series is practically a market-invariant for the six markets. Finally, a cumulative information measure - the `Market Heterogeneity Index- is derived from the integral of the proposed entropy measure. The values of the Market Heterogeneity Index are discussed as possible tools for optimal portfolio construction and compared with those obtained by using the Sharpe ratio a traditional risk diversity measure.
Research on methods of meta-analysis (the synthesis of related study results) has dealt with many simple study indices, but less attention has been paid to the issue of summarizing regression slopes. In part this is because of the many complications that arise when real sets of regression models are accumulated. We outline the complexities involved in synthesizing slopes, describe existing methods of analysis and present a multivariate generalized least squares approach to the synthesis of regression slopes.
A composite likelihood is a non-genuine likelihood function that allows to make inference on limited aspects of a model, such as marginal or conditional distributions. Composite likelihoods are not proper likelihoods and need therefore calibration for their use in inference, from both a frequentist and a Bayesian perspective. The maximizer to the composite likelihood can serve as an estimator and its variance is assessed by means of a suitably defined sandwich matrix. In the Bayesian setting, the composite likelihood can be adjusted by means of magnitude and curvature methods. Magnitude methods imply raising the likelihood to a constant, while curvature methods imply evaluating the likelihood at a different point by translating, rescaling and rotating the parameter vector. Some authors argue that curvature methods are more reliable in general, but others proved that magnitude methods are sufficient to recover, for instance, the null distribution of a test statistic. We propose a simple calibration for the marginal posterior distribution of a scalar parameter of interest which is invariant to monotonic and smooth transformations. This can be enough for instance in medical statistics, where a single scalar effect measure is often the target.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
