Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userWhats in a Name? Answer Equivalence For Open-Domain Question Answering
188
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Chenglei Si
Publication date
2021
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
A flaw in QA evaluation is that annotations often only provide one gold answer. Thus, model predictions semantically equivalent to the answer but superficially different are considered incorrect. This work explores mining alias entities from knowledge bases and using them as additional gold answers (i.e., equivalent answers). We incorporate answers for two settings: evaluation with additional answers and model training with equivalent answers. We analyse three QA benchmarks: Natural Questions, TriviaQA, and SQuAD. Answer expansion increases the exact match score on all datasets for evaluation, while incorporating it helps model training over real-world datasets. We ensure the additional answers are valid through a human post hoc evaluation.
rate research
Read More
Open-domain Question Answering (ODQA) has achieved significant results in terms of supervised learning manner. However, data annotation cannot also be irresistible for its huge demand in an open domain. Though unsupervised QA or unsupervised Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) has been tried more or less, unsupervised ODQA has not been touched according to our best knowledge. This paper thus pioneers the work of unsupervised ODQA by formally introducing the task and proposing a series of key data construction methods. Our exploration in this work inspiringly shows unsupervised ODQA can reach up to 86% performance of supervised ones.
While day-to-day questions come with a variety of answer types, the current question-answering (QA) literature has failed to adequately address the answer diversity of questions. To this end, we present GooAQ, a large-scale dataset with a variety of answer types. This dataset contains over 5 million questions and 3 million answers collected from Google. GooAQ questions are collected semi-automatically from the Google search engine using its autocomplete feature. This results in naturalistic questions of practical interest that are nonetheless short and expressed using simple language. GooAQ answers are mined from Googles responses to our collected questions, specifically from the answer boxes in the search results. This yields a rich space of answer types, containing both textual answers (short and long) as well as more structured ones such as collections. We benchmarkT5 models on GooAQ and observe that: (a) in line with recent work, LMs strong performance on GooAQs short-answer questions heavily benefit from annotated data; however, (b) their quality in generating coherent and accurate responses for questions requiring long responses (such as how and why questions) is less reliant on observing annotated data and mainly supported by their pre-training. We release GooAQ to facilitate further research on improving QA with diverse response types.
To date, most of recent work under the retrieval-reader framework for open-domain QA focuses on either extractive or generative reader exclusively. In this paper, we study a hybrid approach for leveraging the strengths of both models. We apply novel techniques to enhance both extractive and generative readers built upon recent pretrained neural language models, and find that proper training methods can provide large improvement over previous state-of-the-art models. We demonstrate that a simple hybrid approach by combining answers from both readers can efficiently take advantages of extractive and generative answer inference strategies and outperforms single models as well as homogeneous ensembles. Our approach outperforms previous state-of-the-art models by 3.3 and 2.7 points in exact match on NaturalQuestions and TriviaQA respectively.
Open-domain question answering (QA) aims to find the answer to a question from a large collection of documents.Though many models for single-document machine comprehension have achieved strong performance, there is still much room for improving open-domain QA systems since document retrieval and answer reranking are still unsatisfactory. Golden documents that contain the correct answers may not be correctly scored by the retrieval component, and the correct answers that have been extracted may be wrongly ranked after other candidate answers by the reranking component. One of the reasons is derived from the independent principle in which each candidate document (or answer) is scored independently without considering its relationship to other documents (or answers). In this work, we propose a knowledge-aided open-domain QA (KAQA) method which targets at improving relevant document retrieval and candidate answer reranking by considering the relationship between a question and the documents (termed as question-document graph), and the relationship between candidate documents (termed as document-document graph). The graphs are built using knowledge triples from external knowledge resources. During document retrieval, a candidate document is scored by considering its relationship to the question and other documents. During answer reranking, a candidate answer is reranked using not only its own context but also the clues from other documents. The experimental results show that our proposed method improves document retrieval and answer reranking, and thereby enhances the overall performance of open-domain question answering.
Open-domain question answering relies on efficient passage retrieval to select candidate contexts, where traditional sparse vector space models, such as TF-IDF or BM25, are the de facto method. In this work, we show that retrieval can be practically implemented using dense representations alone, where embeddings are learned from a small number of questions and passages by a simple dual-encoder framework. When evaluated on a wide range of open-domain QA datasets, our dense retriever outperforms a strong Lucene-BM25 system largely by 9%-19% absolute in terms of top-20 passage retrieval accuracy, and helps our end-to-end QA system establish new state-of-the-art on multiple open-domain QA benchmarks.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
