No Arabic abstract
In Huybrighs et al., 2020 we investigated energetic proton depletions along Galileos Europa flyby E26. Based on a particle tracing analysis we proposed that depletions are caused by perturbed electrogmagnetic fields combined with atmospheric charge exchange and possible plumes. One depletion feature identified as a plume signature was shown to be an artefact Jia et al., 2021. Despite that, here we emphasize that Huybrighs et al., 2020 demonstrates that plumes can cause proton depletions and that these features should be sought after. Furthermore, the conclusions on the importance of perturbed electromagnetic fields and atmospheric charge exchange on the depletions are unaffected. We suggest that the artefacts cause is a mistagging of protons as heavier ions by EPD. The artefact prevents us from confirming or excluding that there is a plume associated depletion. We also address comments on the MHD simulations and demonstrate that 540-1040 keV losses are not necessarily inconsistent with 115-244 keV losses by plume associated charge exchange.
The location of a repeat plume detected at Europa is found to be coincident with the strongest ionosphere detection made by Galileo radio occultation in 1997.
This is a reply to the comment to a letter by D. Mandal, K. Klymko and M. R. DeWeese published as Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 258001 (2017).
The above comment [E. I. Lashin, D. Dou, arXiv:1606.04738] claims that the paper Quantum Raychaudhuri Equation by S. Das, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 084068 [arXiv:1404.3093] has problematic points with regards to its derivation and implications. We show below that the above claim is incorrect, and that there are no problems with results of the above paper or its implications.
Wong et al. (2018) recently performed an encouraging criticism to our paper Gravitational waves from ultra-short period exoplanets (Cunha, Silva, Lima 2018) exploring the potentialities of a subset of exoplanets with extremely short periods (less than 80 min) as a possible scientific target to the planned space-based LISA observatory. Here we call attention to some subtleties and limitations underlying the basic criticism which in our view were not properly stressed in their comment. Particularly, simple estimates show that a sphere encircling the Earth with a radius of 250 pc may accommodate a population $ sim 10^{4}$ ultra-short period exoplanets with characteristic strain of the same order or higher than the ones analyzed in our paper. This means that the question related to the gravitational wave pattern of ultra-short period exoplanets may be surpassed near future by the LISA instrument with new and more definitive data.
In this Reply we propose a modified security proof of the Quantum Dense Key Distribution protocol detecting also the eavesdropping attack proposed by Wojcik in his Comment.