No Arabic abstract
We reconsider the complete set of four-quark operators in the Weak Effective Theory (WET) for non-leptonic $Delta F=1$ decays that govern $sto d$ and $bto d, s$ transitions in the Standard Model (SM) and beyond, at the Next-to-Leading Order (NLO) in QCD. We discuss cases with different numbers $N_f$ of active flavours, intermediate threshold corrections, as well as the issue of transformations between operator bases beyond leading order to facilitate the matching to high-energy completions or the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) at the electroweak scale. As a first step towards a SMEFT NLO analysis of $Ktopipi$ and non-leptonic $B$-meson decays, we calculate the relevant WET Wilson coefficients including two-loop contributions to their renormalization group running, and express them in terms of the Wilson coefficients in a particular operator basis for which the one-loop matching to SMEFT is already known.
As an important step towards a complete next-to-leading order (NLO) QCD analysis of the ratio $varepsilon/varepsilon$ within the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT), we present for the first time the NLO master formula for the BSM part of this ratio expressed in terms of the Wilson coefficients of all contributing operators evaluated at the electroweak scale. To this end we use the common Weak Effective Theory (WET) basis (the so-called JMS basis) for which tree-level and one-loop matching to the SMEFT are already known. The relevant hadronic matrix elements of BSM operators at the electroweak scale are taken from Dual QCD approach and the SM ones from lattice QCD. It includes the renormalization group evolution and quark-flavour threshold effects at NLO in QCD from hadronic scales, at which these matrix elements have been calculated, to the electroweak scale.
We present a global analysis of the observed Z_c, Z_cs and future Z_css-like spectra using the inverse Laplace transform (LSR) version of QCD spectral sum rules (QSSR) within stability criteria. Integrated compact QCD expressions of the LO spectral functions up to dimension-six condensates are given. Next-to-Leading Order (NLO) factorized perturbative contributions are included. We re-emphasize the importance to include PT radiative corrections (though numerically small) for heavy quark sum rules in order to justify the (ad hoc) definition and value of the heavy quark mass used frequently at LO in the literature. We also demonstrate that, contrary to a naive qualitative 1/N_c counting, the two-meson scattering contributions to the four-quark spectral functions are numerically negligible confirming the reliability of the LSR predictions. Our results are summarized in Tables III to VI. The Z_c(3900) and Z_cs(3983) spectra are well reproduced by the T_c(3900) and T_cs(3973) tetramoles (superposition of quasi-degenerated molecules and tetraquark states having the same quantum numbers and with almost equal couplings to the currents). The Z_c(4025) or Z_c(4040) state can be fitted with the D*_0D_1 molecule having a mass 4023(130) MeV while the Z_cs bump around 4.1 GeV can be likely due to the (D^*_s0D_1+ D^*_0D_s1) molecules. The Z_c(4430) can be a radial excitation of the Z_c(3900) weakly coupled to the current, while all strongly coupled ones are in the region (5634-6527) MeV. The double strange tetramole state T_css which one may identify with the future Z_css is predicted to be at 4064(46) MeV. It is remarkable to notice the regular mass-spliitings of the tetramoles due to SU(3) breakings M_{T_cs}-M_{T_c}= M_{T_css}-M_{T_cs= (73- 91) MeV.
Alerted by the recent LHCb discovery of exotic hadrons in the range (6.2 -- 6.9) GeV, we present new results for the doubly-hidden scalar heavy $(bar QQ) (Qbar Q)$ charm and beauty molecules using the inverse Laplace transform sum rule (LSR) within stability criteria and including the Next-to-Leading Order (NLO) factorized perturbative and $langle G^3rangle$ gluon condensate corrections. We also critically revisit and improve existing Lowest Order (LO) QCD spectral sum rules (QSSR) estimates of the $({ bar Q bar Q})(QQ)$ tetraquarks analogous states. In the example of the anti-scalar-scalar molecule, we separate explicitly the contributions of the factorized and non-factorized contributions to LO of perturbative QCD and to the $langlealpha_sG^2rangle$ gluon condensate contributions in order to disprove some criticisms on the (mis)uses of the sum rules for four-quark currents. We also re-emphasize the importance to include PT radiative corrections for heavy quark sum rules in order to justify the (ad hoc) definition and value of the heavy quark mass used frequently at LO in the literature. Our LSR results for tetraquark masses summarized in Table II are compared with the ones from ratio of moments (MOM) at NLO and results from LSR and ratios of MOM at LO (Table IV). The LHCb broad structure around (6.2 --6.7) GeV can be described by the $overline{eta}_{c}{eta}_{c}$, $overline{J/psi}{J/psi}$ and $overline{chi}_{c1}{chi}_{c1}$ molecules or/and their analogue tetraquark scalar-scalar, axial-axial and vector-vector lowest mass ground states. The peak at (6.8--6.9) GeV can be likely due to a $overline{chi}_{c0}{chi}_{c0}$ molecule or/and a pseudoscalar-pseudoscalar tetraquark state. Similar analysis is done for the scalar beauty states whose masses are found to be above the $overlineeta_beta_b$ and $overlineUpsilon(1S)Upsilon(1S)$ thresholds.
We present a model-independent anatomy of the $Delta F=2$ transitions $K^0-bar K^0$, $B_{s,d}-bar B_{s,d}$ and $D^0-bar D^0$ in the context of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT). We present two master formulae for the mixing amplitude $big[M_{12} big]_text{BSM}$. One in terms of the Wilson coefficients (WCs) of the Low-Energy Effective Theory (LEFT) operators evaluated at the electroweak scale $mu_text{ew}$ and one in terms of the WCs of the SMEFT operators evaluated at the BSM scale $Lambda$. The coefficients $P_a^{ij}$ entering these formulae contain all the information below the scales $mu_text{ew}$ and $Lambda$, respectively. Renormalization group effects from the top-quark Yukawa coupling play the most important role. The collection of the individual contributions of the SMEFT operators to $big[M_{12}big]_text{BSM}$ can be considered as the SMEFT ATLAS of $Delta F=2$ transitions and constitutes a travel guide to such transitions far beyond the scales explored by the LHC. We emphasize that this ATLAS depends on whether the down-basis or the up-basis for SMEFT operators is considered. We illustrate this technology with tree-level exchanges of heavy gauge bosons ($Z^prime$, $G^prime$) and corresponding heavy scalars.
We revisit, improve and complete some recent estimates of the $0^{+}$ and $1^-$ open charm $(bar c bar d)(us)$ tetraquarks and the corresponding molecules masses and decay constants from QCD spectral sum rules (QSSR) by using QCD Laplace sum rule (LSR) within stability criteria where the factorised perturbative NLO corrections and the contributions of quark and gluon condensates up to dimension-6 in the OPE are included. We confront our results with the $D^-K^+$ invariant mass recently reported by LHCb from $B^+to D^+(D^-K^+)$ decays. We expect that the bump near the $D^-K^+$ threshold can be originated from the $0^{++}(D^-K^+)$ molecule and/or $D^-K^+$ scattering. The prominent $X_{0}$(2900) scalar peak and the bump $X_J(3150)$ (if $J=0$) can emerge from a {it minimal mixing model}, with a tiny mixing angle $theta_0simeq (5.2pm 1.9)^0$, between a scalar {it Tetramole} (${cal T_M}_0$) (superposition of nearly degenerated hypothetical molecules and compact tetraquarks states with the same quantum numbers) having a mass $M_{{cal T_M}_0}$=2743(18) MeV and the first radial excitation of the $D^-K^+$ molecule with mass $M_{(DK)_1}=3678(310)$ MeV. In an analogous way, the $X_1$(2900) and the $X_J(3350)$ (if $J=1$) could be a mixture between the vector {it Tetramole} $({cal T_M}_1)$ with a mass $M_{{cal T_M}_1}=2656(20)$ MeV and its first radial excitation having a mass $M_{({cal T_M}_1)_1}=4592(141)$ MeV with an angle $theta_1simeq (9.1pm 0.6)^0$. A (non)-confirmation of the previous {it minimal mixing models} requires an experimental identification of the quantum numbers of the bumps at 3150 and 3350 MeV.