Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userGalaxy Flybys: Evolution of the Bulge, Disk, and Spiral Arms
355
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Galaxy flybys are as common as mergers in low redshift universe and are important for galaxy evolution as they involve the exchange of significant amounts of mass and energy. In this study we investigate the effect of minor flybys on the bulges, disks, and spiral arms of Milky Way mass galaxies for two types of bulges - classical bulges and boxy/peanut pseudobulges. Our N-body simulations comprise of two disk galaxies of mass ratios 10:1 and 5:1, where the disks of the galaxies lie in their orbital plane and the pericenter distance is varied. We performed photometric and kinematic bulge-disk decomposition at regular time steps and traced the evolution of the disk size, spiral structure, bulge sersic index, bulge mass, and bulge angular momentum. Our results show that the main effect on the disks is disk thickening, which is seen as the increase in the ratio of disk scale height to scale radius. The strength of the spiral structure A2/A0 shows small oscillations about the mean time-varying amplitude in the pseudobulge host galaxies. The flyby has no significant effect on non-rotating classical bulge, which shows that these bulges are extremely stable in galaxy interactions. However, the pseudobulges become dynamically hotter in flybys indicating that flybys may play an important role in accelerating the rate of secular evolution in disk galaxies. This effect on pseudobulges is a result of their rotating nature as part of the bar. Also, flybys do not affect the time and strength of bar buckling.
rate research
Read More
In spiral galaxies, the pitch angle, $alpha$, of the spiral arms is often proposed as a discriminator between theories for the formation of the spiral structure. In Lin-Shu density wave theory, $alpha$ stays constant in time, being simply a property of the underlying galaxy. In other theories (e.g tidal interaction, self-gravity) it is expected that the arms wind up in time, so that to a first approximation $cot alpha propto t$. For these theories, it would be expected that a sample of galaxies observed at random times should show a uniform distribution of $cot alpha$. We show that a recent set of measurements of spiral pitch angles (Yu & Ho 2018) is broadly consistent with this expectation.
Since the discovery that the majority of low-redshift galaxies exhibit some level of spiral structure, a number of theories have been proposed as to why these patterns exist. A popular explanation is a process known as swing amplification, yet there is no observational evidence to prove that such a mechanism is at play. By using a number of measured properties of galaxies, and scaling relations where there are no direct measurements, we model samples of SDSS and S$^4$G spiral galaxies in terms of their relative halo, bulge and disc mass and size. Using these models, we test predictions of swing amplification theory with respect to directly measured spiral arm numbers from Galaxy Zoo 2. We find that neither a universal cored or cuspy inner dark matter profile can correctly predict observed numbers of arms in galaxies. However, by invoking a halo contraction/expansion model, a clear bimodality in the spiral galaxy population emerges. Approximately 40 per cent of unbarred spiral galaxies at $z lesssim 0.1$ and $mathrm{M_*} gtrsim 10^{10} mathrm{M_odot}$ have spiral arms that can be modelled by swing amplification. This population display a significant correlation between predicted and observed spiral arm numbers, evidence that they are swing amplified modes. The remainder are dominated by two-arm systems for which the model predicts significantly higher arm numbers. These are likely driven by tidal interactions or other mechanisms.
Aims: Density waves are often considered as the triggering mechanism of star formation in spiral galaxies. Our aim is to study relations between different star formation tracers (stellar UV and near-IR radiation and emission from HI, CO and cold dust) in the spiral arms of M31, to calculate stability conditions in the galaxy disc and to draw conclusions about possible star formation triggering mechanisms. Methods: We select fourteen spiral arm segments from the de-projected data maps and compare emission distributions along the cross sections of the segments in different datasets to each other, in order to detect spatial offsets between young stellar populations and the star forming medium. By using the disc stability condition as a function of perturbation wavelength and distance from the galaxy centre we calculate the effective disc stability parameters and the least stable wavelengths at different distances. For this we utilise a mass distribution model of M31 with four disc components (old and young stellar discs, cold and warm gaseous discs) embedded within the external potential of the bulge, the stellar halo and the dark matter halo. Each component is considered to have a realistic finite thickness. Results: No systematic offsets between the observed UV and CO/far-IR emission across the spiral segments are detected. The calculated effective stability parameter has a minimal value Q_{eff} ~ 1.8 at galactocentric distances 12 - 13 kpc. The least stable wavelengths are rather long, with the minimal values starting from ~ 3 kpc at distances R > 11 kpc. Conclusions: The classical density wave theory is not a realistic explanation for the spiral structure of M31. Instead, external causes should be considered, e.g. interactions with massive gas clouds or dwarf companions of M31.
A model based on disk-stability criteria to determine the number of spiral arms of a general disk galaxy with an exponential disk, a bulge and a dark halo described by a Hernquist model is presented. The multifold rotational symmetry of the spiral structure can be evaluated analytically once the structural properties of a galaxy, such as the circular speed curve, and the disk surface brightness, are known. By changing the disk mass, these models are aimed at varying the critical length scale parameter of the disk and lead to a different spiral morphology in agreement with prior models. Previous studies based on the swing amplification and disk stability have been applied to constrain the mass-to-light ratio in disk galaxies. This formalism provides an analytic expression to estimate the number of arms expected by swing amplification making its application straight-forward to large surveys. It can be applied to predict the number of arms in the Milky Way as a function of radius and to constrain the mass-to-light ratio in disk galaxies for which photometric and kinematic measurements are available, like in the DiskMass survey. Hence, the halo contribution to the total mass in the inner parts of disk galaxies can be inferred in light of the ongoing and forthcoming surveys.
Theoretical studies on the response of interstellar gas to a gravitational potential disc with a quasi-stationary spiral arm pattern suggest that the gas experiences a sudden compression due to standing shock waves at spiral arms. This mechanism, called a galactic shock wave, predicts that gas spiral arms move from downstream to upstream of stellar arms with increasing radius inside a corotation radius. In order to investigate if this mechanism is at work in the grand-design spiral galaxy M51, we have measured azimuthal offsets between the peaks of stellar mass and gas mass distributions in its two spiral arms. The stellar mass distribution is created by the spatially resolved spectral energy distribution fitting to optical and near infrared images, while the gas mass distribution is obtained by high-resolution CO and HI data. For the inner region (r < 150), we find that one arm is consistent with the galactic shock while the other is not. For the outer region, results are less certain due to the narrower range of offset values, the weakness of stellar arms, and the smaller number of successful offset measurements. The results suggest that the nature of two inner spiral arms are different, which is likely due to an interaction with the companion galaxy.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
