Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userHinting a dark matter nature of Sgr A* via the S-stars
116
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Eduar Antonio Becerra Vergara
Publication date
2021
fields
Physics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The motion data of the S-stars around the Galactic center gathered in the last 28 yr imply that Sgr A* hosts a supermassive compact object of about $4times 10^6$ $Modot$, a result awarded with the Nobel Prize in Physics 2020. A non-rotating black hole (BH) nature of Sgr A* has been uncritically adopted since the S-star orbits agree with Schwarzschild geometry geodesics. The orbit of S2 has served as a test of General Relativity predictions such as the gravitational redshift and the relativistic precession. The central BH model is, however, challenged by the G2 post-peripassage motion and by the lack of observations on event-horizon-scale distances robustly pointing to its univocal presence. We have recently shown that the S2 and G2 astrometry data are better fitted by geodesics in the spacetime of a self-gravitating dark matter (DM) core - halo distribution of 56 keV-fermions, darkinos, which also explains the outer halo Galactic rotation curves. This Letter confirms and extends this conclusion using the astrometry data of the $17$ best-resolved S-stars, thereby strengthening the alternative nature of Sgr A* as a dense core of darkinos.
rate research
Read More
An unusual object, G2, had its pericenter passage around Sgr A*, the $4times10^6$ M$_odot$ supermassive black hole in the Galactic Centre, in Summer 2014. Several research teams have reported evidence that following G2s pericenter encounter the rate of Sgr A*s bright X-ray flares increased significantly. Our analysis carefully treats varying flux contamination from a nearby magnetic neutron star and is free from complications induced by using data from multiple X-ray observatories with different spatial resolutions. We test the scenario of an increased bright X-ray flaring rate using a massive dataset from the textit{Chandra X-ray Observatory}, the only X-ray instrument that can spatially distinguish between Sgr A* and the nearby Galactic Centre magnetar throughout the full extended period encompassing G2s encounter with Sgr A*. We use X-ray data from the 3 Ms observations of the textit{Chandra} textit{X-ray Visionary Program} (XVP) in 2012 as well as an additional 1.5 Ms of observations up to 2018. We use detected flares to make distributions of flare properties. Using simulations of X-ray flares accounting for important factors such as the different $Chandra$ instrument modes, we test the null hypothesis on Sgr A*s bright (or any flare category) X-ray flaring rate around different potential change points. In contrast to previous studies, our results are consistent with the null hypothesis; the same model parameters produce distributions consistent with the observed ones around any plausible change point.
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) will revolutionise our understanding of early galaxy formation, and could potentially set stringent constraints on the nature of dark matter. We use a semi-empirical model of galaxy formation to investigate the extent to which uncertainties in the implementation of baryonic physics may be degenerate with the predictions of two different models of dark matter -- Cold Dark Matter (CDM) and a 7 keV sterile neutrino, which behaves as Warm Dark Matter (WDM). Our models are calibrated to the observed UV luminosity function at $z=4$ using two separate dust attenuation prescriptions, which manifest as high and low star formation efficiency in low mass haloes. We find that while at fixed star formation efficiency, $varepsilon$, there are marked differences in the abundance of faint galaxies in the two dark matter models at high-$z$, these differences are mimicked easily by varying $varepsilon$ in the same dark matter model. We find that a high $varepsilon$ WDM and a low $varepsilon$ CDM model -- which provide equally good fits to the $z=4$ UV luminosity function -- exhibit nearly identical evolution in the cosmic stellar mass and star formation rate densities. We show that differences in the star formation rate at fixed stellar mass are larger for variations in $varepsilon$ in a given dark matter model than they are between dark matter models; however, the scatter in star formation rates is larger between the two models than they are when varying $varepsilon$. Our results suggest that JWST will likely be more informative in constraining baryonic processes operating in high-$z$ galaxies than it will be in constraining the nature of dark matter.
Deep observations of galaxies reveal faint extended stellar components (hereafter ESCs) of streams, shells, and halos. These are a natural prediction of hierarchical galaxy formation, as accreted satellite galaxies are tidally disrupted by their host. We investigate whether or not global properties of the ESC could be used to test of dark matter, reasoning that they should be sensitive to the abundance of low-mass satellites, and therefore the underlying dark matter model. Using cosmological simulations of galaxy formation in the favoured Cold Dark Matter (CDM) and Warm Dark Matter (WDM) models ($m_{rm WDM}$=0.5,1,2 keV/$c^2$), which suppress the abundance of low-mass satellites, we find that the kinematics and orbital structure of the ESC is consistent across models. However, we find striking differences in its spatial structure, as anticipated -- a factor of $sim$10 drop in spherically averaged mass density between $sim$10% and $sim$75% of the virial radius in the more extreme WDM runs ($m_{rm WDM}$=0.5, 1 keV/$c^2$) relative to the CDM run. These differences are consistent with the mass assembly histories of the different components, and are present across redshifts. However, even the least discrepant of the WDM models is incompatible with current observational limits on $m_{rm WDM}$. Importantly, the differences we observe when varying the underlying dark matter are comparable to the galaxy-to-galaxy variation we expect within a fixed dark matter model. This suggests that it will be challenging to place limits on dark matter using only the unresolved spatial structure of the the ESC.
A thick dark matter disk is predicted in cold dark matter simulations as the outcome of the interaction between accreted satellites and the stellar disk in Milky Way sized halos. We study the effects of a self-interacting thick dark disk on the energetic neutrino flux from the Sun. We find that for particle masses between 100 GeV and 1 TeV and dark matter annihilation to heavy leptons either the self-interaction may not be strong enough to solve the small scale structure motivation or a dark disk cannot be present in the Milky Way.
We use thirty-eight high-resolution simulations of galaxy formation between redshift 10 and 5 to study the impact of a 3 keV warm dark matter (WDM) candidate on the high-redshift Universe. We focus our attention on the stellar mass function and the global star formation rate and consider the consequences for reionization, namely the neutral hydrogen fraction evolution and the electron scattering optical depth. We find that three different effects contribute to differentiate warm and cold dark matter (CDM) predictions: WDM suppresses the number of haloes with mass less than few $10^9$ M$_{odot}$; at a fixed halo mass, WDM produces fewer stars than CDM; and finally at halo masses below $10^9$ M$_{odot}$, WDM has a larger fraction of dark haloes than CDM post-reionization. These three effects combine to produce a lower stellar mass function in WDM for galaxies with stellar masses at and below $sim 10^7$ M$_{odot}$. For $z > 7$, the global star formation density is lower by a factor of two in the WDM scenario, and for a fixed escape fraction, the fraction of neutral hydrogen is higher by 0.3 at $z sim 6$. This latter quantity can be partially reconciled with CDM and observations only by increasing the escape fraction from 23 per cent to 34 per cent. Overall, our study shows that galaxy formation simulations at high redshift are a key tool to differentiate between dark matter candidates given a model for baryonic physics.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
