Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userTowards Variable-Length Textual Adversarial Attacks
166
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Junliang Guo
Publication date
2021
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Adversarial attacks have shown the vulnerability of machine learning models, however, it is non-trivial to conduct textual adversarial attacks on natural language processing tasks due to the discreteness of data. Most previous approaches conduct attacks with the atomic textit{replacement} operation, which usually leads to fixed-length adversarial examples and therefore limits the exploration on the decision space. In this paper, we propose variable-length textual adversarial attacks~(VL-Attack) and integrate three atomic operations, namely textit{insertion}, textit{deletion} and textit{replacement}, into a unified framework, by introducing and manipulating a special textit{blank} token while attacking. In this way, our approach is able to more comprehensively find adversarial examples around the decision boundary and effectively conduct adversarial attacks. Specifically, our method drops the accuracy of IMDB classification by $96%$ with only editing $1.3%$ tokens while attacking a pre-trained BERT model. In addition, fine-tuning the victim model with generated adversarial samples can improve the robustness of the model without hurting the performance, especially for length-sensitive models. On the task of non-autoregressive machine translation, our method can achieve $33.18$ BLEU score on IWSLT14 German-English translation, achieving an improvement of $1.47$ over the baseline model.
rate research
Read More
Recent work shows that deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples. Much work studies adversarial example generation, while very little work focuses on more critical adversarial defense. Existing adversarial detection methods usually make assumptions about the adversarial example and attack method (e.g., the word frequency of the adversarial example, the perturbation level of the attack method). However, this limits the applicability of the detection method. To this end, we propose TREATED, a universal adversarial detection method that can defend against attacks of various perturbation levels without making any assumptions. TREATED identifies adversarial examples through a set of well-designed reference models. Extensive experiments on three competitive neural networks and two widely used datasets show that our method achieves better detection performance than baselines. We finally conduct ablation studies to verify the effectiveness of our method.
Adversarial examples expose the vulnerabilities of natural language processing (NLP) models, and can be used to evaluate and improve their robustness. Existing techniques of generating such examples are typically driven by local heuristic rules that are agnostic to the context, often resulting in unnatural and ungrammatical outputs. This paper presents CLARE, a ContextuaLized AdversaRial Example generation model that produces fluent and grammatical outputs through a mask-then-infill procedure. CLARE builds on a pre-trained masked language model and modifies the inputs in a context-aware manner. We propose three contextualized perturbations, Replace, Insert and Merge, allowing for generating outputs of varied lengths. With a richer range of available strategies, CLARE is able to attack a victim model more efficiently with fewer edits. Extensive experiments and human evaluation demonstrate that CLARE outperforms the baselines in terms of attack success rate, textual similarity, fluency and grammaticality.
Despite the remarkable success deep models have achieved in Textual Matching (TM), their robustness issue is still a topic of concern. In this work, we propose a new perspective to study this issue -- via the length divergence bias of TM models. We conclude that this bias stems from two parts: the label bias of existing TM datasets and the sensitivity of TM models to superficial information. We critically examine widely used TM datasets, and find that all of them follow specific length divergence distributions by labels, providing direct cues for predictions. As for the TM models, we conduct adversarial evaluation and show that all models performances drop on the out-of-distribution adversarial test sets we construct, which demonstrates that they are all misled by biased training sets. This is also confirmed by the textit{SentLen} probing task that all models capture rich length information during training to facilitate their performances. Finally, to alleviate the length divergence bias in TM models, we propose a practical adversarial training method using bias-free training data. Our experiments indicate that we successfully improve the robustness and generalization ability of models at the same time.
Recently, the textual adversarial attack models become increasingly popular due to their successful in estimating the robustness of NLP models. However, existing works have obvious deficiencies. (1) They usually consider only a single granularity of modification strategies (e.g. word-level or sentence-level), which is insufficient to explore the holistic textual space for generation; (2) They need to query victim models hundreds of times to make a successful attack, which is highly inefficient in practice. To address such problems, in this paper we propose MAYA, a Multi-grAnularitY Attack model to effectively generate high-quality adversarial samples with fewer queries to victim models. Furthermore, we propose a reinforcement-learning based method to train a multi-granularity attack agent through behavior cloning with the expert knowledge from our MAYA algorithm to further reduce the query times. Additionally, we also adapt the agent to attack black-box models that only output labels without confidence scores. We conduct comprehensive experiments to evaluate our attack models by attacking BiLSTM, BERT and RoBERTa in two different black-box attack settings and three benchmark datasets. Experimental results show that our models achieve overall better attacking performance and produce more fluent and grammatical adversarial samples compared to baseline models. Besides, our adversarial attack agent significantly reduces the query times in both attack settings. Our codes are released at https://github.com/Yangyi-Chen/MAYA.
Textual adversarial attacking has received wide and increasing attention in recent years. Various attack models have been proposed, which are enormously distinct and implemented with different programming frameworks and settings. These facts hinder quick utilization and apt comparison of attack models. In this paper, we present an open-source textual adversarial attack toolkit named OpenAttack. It currently builds in 12 typical attack models that cover all the attack types. Its highly inclusive modular design not only supports quick utilization of existing attack models, but also enables great flexibility and extensibility. OpenAttack has broad uses including comparing and evaluating attack models, measuring robustness of a victim model, assisting in developing new attack models, and adversarial training. Source code, built-in models and documentation can be obtained at https://github.com/thunlp/OpenAttack.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
