Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userPopulation-scale testing can suppress the spread of infectious disease
60
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Ioannis Kontoyiannis
Publication date
2021
fields
Biology
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Major advances in public health have resulted from disease prevention. However, prevention of a new infectious disease by vaccination or pharmaceuticals is made difficult by the slow process of vaccine and drug development. We propose an additional intervention that allows rapid control of emerging infectious diseases, and can also be used to eradicate diseases that rely almost exclusively on human-to-human transmission. The intervention is based on (1) testing every individual for the disease, (2) repeatedly, and (3) isolation of infected individuals. We show here that at a sufficient rate of testing, the reproduction number is reduced below 1.0 and the epidemic will rapidly collapse. The approach does not rely on strong or unrealistic assumptions about test accuracy, isolation compliance, population structure or epidemiological parameters, and its success can be monitored in real time by following the test positivity rate. In addition to the compliance rate and false negatives, the required rate of testing depends on the design of the testing regime, with concurrent testing outperforming random sampling. Provided that results are obtained rapidly, the test frequency required to suppress an epidemic is monotonic and near-linear with respect to R0, the infectious period, and the fraction of susceptible individuals. The testing regime is effective against both early phase and established epidemics, and additive to other interventions (e.g. contact tracing and social distancing). It is also robust to failure: any rate of testing reduces the number of infections, improving both public health and economic conditions. These conclusions are based on rigorous analysis and simulations of appropriate epidemiological models. A mass-produced, disposable test that could be used at home would be ideal, due to the optimal performance of concurrent tests that return immediate results.
rate research
Read More
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant changes in how people are currently living their lives. To determine how to best reduce the effects of the pandemic and start reopening societies, governments have drawn insights from mathematical models of the spread of infectious diseases. In this article, we give an introduction to a family of mathematical models (called compartmental models) and discuss how the results of analyzing these models influence government policies and human behavior, such as encouraging mask wearing and physical distancing to help slow the spread of the disease.
We explore the application of probability generating functions (PGFs) to invasive processes, focusing on infectious disease introduced into large populations. Our goal is to acquaint the reader with applications of PGFs, moreso than to derive new results. PGFs help predict a number of properties about early outbreak behavior while the population is still effectively infinite, including the probability of an epidemic, the size distribution after some number of generations, and the cumulative size distribution of non-epidemic outbreaks. We show how PGFs can be used in both discrete-time and continuous-time settings, and discuss how to use these results to infer disease parameters from observed outbreaks. In the large population limit for susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) epidemics PGFs lead to survival-function based models that are equivalent the the usual mass-action SIR models but with fewer ODEs. We use these to explore properties such as the final size of epidemics or even the dynamics once stochastic effects are negligible. We target this tutorial to biologists and public health researchers who want to learn how to apply PGFs to invasive diseases, but it could also be used in an introductory mathematics course on PGFs. We include many exercises to help demonstrate concepts and to give practice applying the results. We summarize our main results in a few tables. Additionally we provide a small python package which performs many of the relevant calculations.
Metapopulation models describing cities with different populations coupled by the travel of individuals are of great importance in the understanding of disease spread on a large scale. An important example is the Rvachev-Longini model [{it Math. Biosci.} {bf 75}, 3-22 (1985)] which is widely used in computational epidemiology. Few analytical results are however available and in particular little is known about paths followed by epidemics and disease arrival times. We study the arrival time of a disease in a city as a function of the starting seed of the epidemics. We propose an analytical Ansatz, test it in the case of a spreading on the world wide air transportation network, and show that it predicts accurately the arrival order of a disease in world-wide cities.
We study metapopulation models for the spread of epidemics in which different subpopulations (cities) are connected by fluxes of individuals (travelers). This framework allows to describe the spread of a disease on a large scale and we focus here on the computation of the arrival time of a disease as a function of the properties of the seed of the epidemics and of the characteristics of the network connecting the various subpopulations. Using analytical and numerical arguments, we introduce an easily computable quantity which approximates this average arrival time. We show on the example of a disease spread on the world-wide airport network that this quantity predicts with a good accuracy the order of arrival of the disease in the various subpopulations in each realization of epidemic scenario, and not only for an average over realizations. Finally, this quantity might be useful in the identification of the dominant paths of the disease spread.
We review research papers which use game theory to model the decision making of individuals during an epidemic, attempting to classify the literature and identify the emerging trends in this field. We show that the literature can be classified based on (i) type of population modelling (compartmental or network-based), (ii) frequency of the game (non-iterative or iterative), and (iii) type of strategy adoption (self-evaluation or imitation). We highlight that the choice of model depends on many factors such as the type of immunity the disease confers, the type of immunity the vaccine confers, and size of population and level of mixing therein. We show that while early studies used compartmental modelling with self-evaluation based strategy adoption, the recent trend is to use network-based modelling with imitation-based strategy adoption. Our review indicates that game theory continues to be an effective tool to model intervention (vaccination or social distancing) decision-making by individuals.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
