Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userIn- and Equivariance for Optimal Designs in Generalized Linear Models: The Gamma Model
97
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Osama Idais
Publication date
2020
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We give an overview over the usefulness of the concept of equivariance and invariance in the design of experiments for generalized linear models. In contrast to linear models here pairs of transformations have to be considered which act simultaneously on the experimental settings and on the location parameters in the linear component. Given the transformation of the experimental settings the parameter transformations are not unique and may be nonlinear to make further use of the model structure. The general concepts and results are illustrated by models with gamma distributed response. Locally optimal and maximin efficient design are obtained for the common D- and IMSE-criterion.
rate research
Read More
The gamma model is a generalized linear model for gamma-distributed outcomes. The model is widely applied in psychology, ecology or medicine. In this paper we focus on gamma models having a linear predictor without intercept. For a specific scenario sets of locally D- and A-optimal designs are to be developed. Recently, Gaffke et al. (2018) established a complete class and an essentially complete class of designs for gamma models to obtain locally D-optimal designs. However to extend this approach to gamma model without an intercept term is complicated. To solve that further techniques have to be developed in the current work. Further, by a suitable transformation between gamma models with and without intercept optimality results may be transferred from one model to the other. Additionally by means of The General Equivalence Theorem optimality can be characterized for multiple regression by a system of polynomial inequalities which can be solved analytically or by computer algebra. By this necessary and sufficient conditions on the parameter values can be obtained for the local D-optimality of particular designs. The robustness of the derived designs with respect to misspecifications of the initial parameter values is examined by means of their local D-efficiencies.
We consider the problem of designing experiments for the comparison of two regression curves describing the relation between a predictor and a response in two groups, where the data between and within the group may be dependent. In order to derive efficient designs we use results from stochastic analysis to identify the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) in a corresponding continuous time model. It is demonstrated that in general simultaneous estimation using the data from both groups yields more precise results than estimation of the parameters separately in the two groups. Using the BLUE from simultaneous estimation, we then construct an efficient linear estimator for finite sample size by minimizing the mean squared error between the optimal solution in the continuous time model and its discrete approximation with respect to the weights (of the linear estimator). Finally, the optimal design points are determined by minimizing the maximal width of a simultaneous confidence band for the difference of the two regression functions. The advantages of the new approach are illustrated by means of a simulation study, where it is shown that the use of the optimal designs yields substantially narrower confidence bands than the application of uniform designs.
In the setting of high-dimensional linear models with Gaussian noise, we investigate the possibility of confidence statements connected to model selection. Although there exist numerous procedures for adaptive point estimation, the construction of adaptive confidence regions is severely limited (cf. Li, 1989). The present paper sheds new light on this gap. We develop exact and adaptive confidence sets for the best approximating model in terms of risk. One of our constructions is based on a multiscale procedure and a particular coupling argument. Utilizing exponential inequalities for noncentral chi-squared distributions, we show that the risk and quadratic loss of all models within our confidence region are uniformly bounded by the minimal risk times a factor close to one.
Additive models, as a natural generalization of linear regression, have played an important role in studying nonlinear relationships. Despite of a rich literature and many recent advances on the topic, the statistical inference problem in additive models is still relatively poorly understood. Motivated by the inference for the exposure effect and other applications, we tackle in this paper the statistical inference problem for $f_1(x_0)$ in additive models, where $f_1$ denotes the univariate function of interest and $f_1(x_0)$ denotes its first order derivative evaluated at a specific point $x_0$. The main challenge for this local inference problem is the understanding and control of the additional uncertainty due to the need of estimating other components in the additive model as nuisance functions. To address this, we propose a decorrelated local linear estimator, which is particularly useful in reducing the effect of the nuisance function estimation error on the estimation accuracy of $f_1(x_0)$. We establish the asymptotic limiting distribution for the proposed estimator and then construct confidence interval and hypothesis testing procedures for $f_1(x_0)$. The variance level of the proposed estimator is of the same order as that of the local least squares in nonparametric regression, or equivalently the additive model with one component, while the bias of the proposed estimator is jointly determined by the statistical accuracies in estimating the nuisance functions and the relationship between the variable of interest and the nuisance variables. The method is developed for general additive models and is demonstrated in the high-dimensional sparse setting.
Optimal design theory for nonlinear regression studies local optimality on a given design space. We identify designs for the Bradley--Terry paired comparison model with small undirected graphs and prove that every saturated D-optimal design is represented by a path. We discuss the case of four alternatives in detail and derive explicit polynomial inequality descriptions for optimality regions in parameter space. Using these regions, for each point in parameter space we can prescribe a D-optimal design.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
