Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userPartial identification and dependence-robust confidence intervals for capture-recapture surveys
77
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Jinghao Sun
Publication date
2020
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Authors
Jinghao Sun
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Capture-recapture (CRC) surveys are widely used to estimate the size of a population whose members cannot be enumerated directly. When $k$ capture samples are obtained, counts of unit captures in subsets of samples are represented naturally by a $2^k$ contingency table in which one element -- the number of individuals appearing in none of the samples -- remains unobserved. In the absence of additional assumptions, the population size is not point-identified. Assumptions about independence between samples are often used to achieve point-identification. However, real-world CRC surveys often use convenience samples in which independence cannot be guaranteed, and population size estimates under independence assumptions may lack empirical credibility. In this work, we apply the theory of partial identification to show that weak assumptions or qualitative knowledge about the nature of dependence between samples can be used to characterize a non-trivial set in which the true population size lies with high probability. We construct confidence sets for the population size under bounds on pairwise capture probabilities, and bounds on the highest order interaction term in a log-linear model using two methods: test inversion bootstrap confidence intervals, and profile likelihood confidence intervals. We apply these methods to recent survey data to estimate the number of people who inject drugs in Brussels, Belgium.
rate research
Read More
Estimation of population size using incomplete lists (also called the capture-recapture problem) has a long history across many biological and social sciences. For example, human rights and other groups often construct partial and overlapping lists of victims of armed conflicts, with the hope of using this information to estimate the total number of victims. Earlier statistical methods for this setup either use potentially restrictive parametric assumptions, or else rely on typically suboptimal plug-in-type nonparametric estimators; however, both approaches can lead to substantial bias, the former via model misspecification and the latter via smoothing. Under an identifying assumption that two lists are conditionally independent given measured covariate information, we make several contributions. First, we derive the nonparametric efficiency bound for estimating the capture probability, which indicates the best possible performance of any estimator, and sheds light on the statistical limits of capture-recapture methods. Then we present a new estimator, and study its finite-sample properties, showing that it has a double robustness property new to capture-recapture, and that it is near-optimal in a non-asymptotic sense, under relatively mild nonparametric conditions. Next, we give a method for constructing confidence intervals for total population size from generic capture probability estimators, and prove non-asymptotic near-validity. Finally, we study our methods in simulations, and apply them to estimate the number of killings and disappearances attributable to different groups in Peru during its internal armed conflict between 1980 and 2000.
Although parametric empirical Bayes confidence intervals of multiple normal means are fundamental tools for compound decision problems, their performance can be sensitive to the misspecification of the parametric prior distribution (typically normal distribution), especially when some strong signals are included. We suggest a simple modification of the standard confidence intervals such that the proposed interval is robust against misspecification of the prior distribution. Our main idea is using well-known Tweedies formula with robust likelihood based on $gamma$-divergence. An advantage of the new interval is that the interval lengths are always smaller than or equal to those of the parametric empirical Bayes confidence interval so that the new interval is efficient and robust. We prove asymptotic validity that the coverage probability of the proposed confidence intervals attain a nominal level even when the true underlying distribution of signals is contaminated, and the coverage accuracy is less sensitive to the contamination ratio. The numerical performance of the proposed method is demonstrated through simulation experiments and a real data application.
Introductory texts on statistics typically only cover the classical two sigma confidence interval for the mean value and do not describe methods to obtain confidence intervals for other estimators. The present technical report fills this gap by first defining different methods for the construction of confidence intervals, and then by their application to a binomial proportion, the mean value, and to arbitrary estimators. Beside the frequentist approach, the likelihood ratio and the highest posterior density approach are explained. Two methods to estimate the variance of general maximum likelihood estimators are described (Hessian, Jackknife), and for arbitrary estimators the bootstrap is suggested. For three examples, the different methods are evaluated by means of Monte Carlo simulations with respect to their coverage probability and interval length. R code is given for all methods, and the practitioner obtains a guideline which method should be used in which cases.
We propose a new procedure for inference on optimal treatment regimes in the model-free setting, which does not require to specify an outcome regression model. Existing model-free estimators for optimal treatment regimes are usually not suitable for the purpose of inference, because they either have nonstandard asymptotic distributions or do not necessarily guarantee consistent estimation of the parameter indexing the Bayes rule due to the use of surrogate loss. We first study a smoothed robust estimator that directly targets the parameter corresponding to the Bayes decision rule for optimal treatment regimes estimation. This estimator is shown to have an asymptotic normal distribution. Furthermore, we verify that a resampling procedure provides asymptotically accurate inference for both the parameter indexing the optimal treatment regime and the optimal value function. A new algorithm is developed to calculate the proposed estimator with substantially improved speed and stability. Numerical results demonstrate the satisfactory performance of the new methods.
Population size estimation based on two sample capture-recapture type experiment is an interesting problem in various fields including epidemiology, pubic health, population studies, etc. The Lincoln-Petersen estimate is popularly used under the assumption that capture and recapture status of each individual is independent. However, in many real life scenarios, there is an inherent dependency between capture and recapture attempts which is not well-studied in the literature of the dual system or two sample capture-recapture method. In this article, we propose a novel model that successfully incorporates the possible causal dependency and provide corresponding estimation methodologies for the associated model parameters based on post-stratified two sample capture-recapture data. The superiority of the performance of the proposed model over the existing competitors is established through an extensive simulation study. The method is illustrated through analysis of some real data sets.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
