Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userComputational methods for cancer driver discovery: A survey
192
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Motivation: Uncovering the genomic causes of cancer, known as cancer driver genes, is a fundamental task in biomedical research. Cancer driver genes drive the development and progression of cancer, thus identifying cancer driver genes and their regulatory mechanism is crucial to the design of cancer treatment and intervention. Many computational methods, which take the advantages of computer science and data science, have been developed to utilise multiple types of genomic data to reveal cancer drivers and their regulatory mechanism behind cancer development and progression. Due to the complexity of the mechanistic insight of cancer genes in driving cancer and the fast development of the field, it is necessary to have a comprehensive review about the current computational methods for discovering different types of cancer drivers. Results: We survey computational methods for identifying cancer drivers from genomic data. We categorise the methods into three groups, methods for single driver identification, methods for driver module identification, and methods for identifying personalised cancer drivers. We also conduct a case study to compare the performance of the current methods. We further analyse the advantages and limitations of the current methods, and discuss the challenges and future directions of the topic. In addition, we investigate the resources for discovering and validating cancer drivers in order to provide a one-stop reference of the tools to facilitate cancer driver discovery. The ultimate goal of the paper is to help those interested in the topic to establish a solid background to carry out further research in the field.
rate research
Read More
Extracting genetic information from a full range of sequencing data is important for understanding diseases. We propose a novel method to effectively explore the landscape of genetic mutations and aggregate them to predict cancer type. We used multinomial logistic regression, nonsmooth non-negative matrix factorization (nsNMF), and support vector machine (SVM) to utilize the full range of sequencing data, aiming at better aggregating genetic mutations and improving their power in predicting cancer types. Specifically, we introduced a classifier to distinguish cancer types using somatic mutations obtained from whole-exome sequencing data. Mutations were identified from multiple cancers and scored using SIFT, PP2, and CADD, and grouped at the individual gene level. The nsNMF was then applied to reduce dimensionality and to obtain coefficient and basis matrices. A feature matrix was derived from the obtained matrices to train a classifier for cancer type classification with the SVM model. We have demonstrated that the classifier was able to distinguish the cancer types with reasonable accuracy. In five-fold cross-validations using mutation counts as features, the average prediction accuracy was 77.1% (SEM=0.1%), significantly outperforming baselines and outperforming models using mutation scores as features. Using the factor matrices derived from the nsNMF, we identified multiple genes and pathways that are significantly associated with each cancer type. This study presents a generic and complete pipeline to study the associations between somatic mutations and cancers. The discovered genes and pathways associated with each cancer type can lead to biological insights. The proposed method can be adapted to other studies for disease classification and pathway discovery.
The analysis of differential gene expression from RNA-Seq data has become a standard for several research areas mainly involving bioinformatics. The steps for the computational analysis of these data include many data types and file formats, and a wide variety of computational tools that can be applied alone or together as pipelines. This paper presents a review of differential expression analysis pipeline, addressing its steps and the respective objectives, the principal methods available in each step and their properties, bringing an overview in an organized way in this context. In particular, this review aims to address mainly the aspects involved in the differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis from RNA sequencing data (RNA-Seq), considering the computational methods and its properties. In addition, a timeline of the evolution of computational methods for DEG is presented and discussed, as well as the relationships existing between the main computational tools are presented by an interaction network. A discussion on the challenges and gaps in DEG analysis is also highlighted in this review.
Precision medicine is a paradigm shift in healthcare relying heavily on genomics data. However, the complexity of biological interactions, the large number of genes as well as the lack of comparisons on the analysis of data, remain a tremendous bottleneck regarding clinical adoption. In this paper, we introduce a novel, automatic and unsupervised framework to discover low-dimensional gene biomarkers. Our method is based on the LP-Stability algorithm, a high dimensional center-based unsupervised clustering algorithm, that offers modularity as concerns metric functions and scalability, while being able to automatically determine the best number of clusters. Our evaluation includes both mathematical and biological criteria. The recovered signature is applied to a variety of biological tasks, including screening of biological pathways and functions, and characterization relevance on tumor types and subtypes. Quantitative comparisons among different distance metrics, commonly used clustering methods and a referential gene signature used in the literature, confirm state of the art performance of our approach. In particular, our signature, that is based on 27 genes, reports at least $30$ times better mathematical significance (average Dunns Index) and 25% better biological significance (average Enrichment in Protein-Protein Interaction) than those produced by other referential clustering methods. Finally, our signature reports promising results on distinguishing immune inflammatory and immune desert tumors, while reporting a high balanced accuracy of 92% on tumor types classification and averaged balanced accuracy of 68% on tumor subtypes classification, which represents, respectively 7% and 9% higher performance compared to the referential signature.
The existence of doublets is a key confounder in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis. Computational methods have been developed for detecting doublets from scRNA-seq data. We developed an R package DoubletCollection to integrate the installation and execution of eight doublet-detection methods. DoubletCollection also provides a unified interface to perform and visualize downstream analysis after doublet detection. Here, we present a protocol of using DoubletCollection to benchmark doublet-detection methods. This protocol can automatically accommodate new doublet-detection methods in the fast-growing scRNA-seq field.
As genome sequencing tools and techniques improve, researchers are able to incrementally assemble more accurate reference genomes, which enable sensitivity in read mapping and downstream analysis such as variant calling. A more sensitive downstream analysis is critical for a better understanding of the genome donor (e.g., health characteristics). Therefore, read sets from sequenced samples should ideally be mapped to the latest available reference genome that represents the most relevant population. Unfortunately, the increasingly large amount of available genomic data makes it prohibitively expensive to fully re-map each read set to its respective reference genome every time the reference is updated. There are several tools that attempt to accelerate the process of updating a read data set from one reference to another (i.e., remapping). However, if a read maps to a region in the old reference that does not appear with a reasonable degree of similarity in the new reference, the read cannot be remapped. We find that, as a result of this drawback, a significant portion of annotations are lost when using state-of-the-art remapping tools. To address this major limitation in existing tools, we propose AirLift, a fast and comprehensive technique for remapping alignments from one genome to another. Compared to the state-of-the-art method for remapping reads (i.e., full mapping), AirLift reduces 1) the number of reads that need to be fully mapped to the new reference by up to 99.99% and 2) the overall execution time to remap read sets between two reference genom
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
