Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userProcess algebra, process scheduling, and mutual exclusion
142
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Kees Middelburg
Publication date
2020
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Authors
C. A. Middelburg
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
In the case of multi-threading as found in contemporary programming languages, parallel processes are interleaved according to what is known as a process-scheduling policy in the field of operating systems. In a previous paper, we extend ACP with this form of interleaving. In the current paper, we do so with the variant of ACP known as ACP$_epsilon$. The choice of ACP$_epsilon$ stems from the need to cover more process-scheduling policies. We show that a process-scheduling policy supporting mutual exclusion of critical subprocesses is now covered.
rate research
Read More
In contrast to common belief, the Calculus of Communicating Systems (CCS) and similar process algebras lack the expressive power to accurately capture mutual exclusion protocols without enriching the language with fairness assumptions. Adding a fairness assumption to implement a mutual exclusion protocol seems counter-intuitive. We employ a signalling operator, which can be combined with CCS, or other process calculi, and show that this minimal extension is expressive enough to model mutual exclusion: we confirm the correctness of Petersons mutual exclusion algorithm for two processes, as well as Lamports bakery algorithm, under reasonable assumptions on the underlying memory model. The correctness of Petersons algorithm for more than two processes requires stronger, less realistic assumptions on the underlying memory model.
I show that in a standard process algebra extended with time-outs one can correctly model mutual exclusion in such a way that starvation-freedom holds without assuming fairness or justness, even when one makes the problem more challenging by assuming memory accesses to be atomic. This can be achieved only when dropping the requirement of speed independence.
We first present a probabilistic version of ACP that rests on the principle that probabilistic choices are always resolved before choices involved in alternative composition and parallel composition are resolved and then extend this probabilistic version of ACP with a form of interleaving in which parallel processes are interleaved according to what is known as a process-scheduling policy in the field of operating systems. We use the term strategic interleaving for this more constrained form of interleaving. The extension covers probabilistic process-scheduling policies.
In process algebras such as ACP (Algebra of Communicating Processes), parallel processes are considered to be interleaved in an arbitrary way. In the case of multi-threading as found in contemporary programming languages, parallel processes are actually interleaved according to some interleaving strategy. An interleaving strategy is what is called a process-scheduling policy in the field of operating systems. In many systems, for instance hardware/software systems, we have to do with both parallel processes that may best be considered to be interleaved in an arbitrary way and parallel processes that may best be considered to be interleaved according to some interleaving strategy. Therefore, we extend ACP in this paper with the latter form of interleaving. The established properties of the extension concerned include an elimination property, a conservative extension property, and a unique expansion property.
This paper introduces an imperative process algebra based on ACP (Algebra of Communicating Processes). Like other imperative process algebras, this process algebra deals with processes of the kind that arises from the execution of imperative programs. It distinguishes itself from already existing imperative process algebras among other things by supporting abstraction from actions that are considered not to be visible. The support of abstraction opens interesting application possibilities of the process algebra. This paper goes briefly into the possibility of information-flow security analysis of the kind that is concerned with the leakage of confidential data. For the presented axiomatization, soundness and semi-completeness results with respect to a notion of branching bisimulation equivalence are established.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
