Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userA Component-Based Formal Language Workbench
60
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
EPTCS
Publication date
2019
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Authors
Peter D. Mosses
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The CBS framework supports component-based specification of programming languages. It aims to significantly reduce the effort of formal language specification, and thereby encourage language developers to exploit formal semantics more widely. CBS provides an extensive library of reusable language specification components, facilitating co-evolution of languages and their specifications. After introducing CBS and its formal definition, this short paper reports work in progress on generating an IDE for CBS from the definition. It also considers the possibility of supporting component-based language specification in other formal language workbenches.
rate research
Read More
Algorithmic and data refinement are well studied topics that provide a mathematically rigorous approach to gradually introducing details in the implementation of software. Program refinements are performed in the context of some programming language, but mainstream languages lack features for recording the sequence of refinement steps in the program text. To experiment with the combination of refinement, automated verification, and language design, refinement features have been added to the verification-aware programming language Dafny. This paper describes those features and reflects on some initial usage thereof.
Testing of network services represents one of the biggest challenges in cyber security. Because new vulnerabilities are detected on a regular basis, more research is needed. These faults have their roots in the software development cycle or because of intrinsic leaks in the system specification. Conformance testing checks whether a system behaves according to its specification. Here model-based testing provides several methods for automated detection of shortcomings. The formal specification of a system behavior represents the starting point of the testing process. In this paper, a widely used cryptographic protocol is specified and tested for conformance with a test execution framework. The first empirical results are presented and discussed.
While recent progress in quantum hardware open the door for significant speedup in certain key areas (cryptography, biology, chemistry, optimization, machine learning, etc), quantum algorithms are still hard to implement right, and the validation of such quantum programs is achallenge. Moreover, importing the testing and debugging practices at use in classical programming is extremely difficult in the quantum case, due to the destructive aspect of quantum measurement. As an alternative strategy, formal methods are prone to play a decisive role in the emerging field of quantum software. Recent works initiate solutions for problems occurring at every stage of the development process: high-level program design, implementation, compilation, etc. We review the induced challenges for an efficient use of formal methods in quantum computing and the current most promising research directions.
Dynamic languages like Erlang, Clojure, JavaScript, and E adopted data-race freedom by design. To enforce data-race freedom, these languages either deep copy objects during actor (thread) communication or proxy back to their owning thread. We present Dala, a simple programming model that ensures data-race freedom while supporting efficient inter-thread communication. Dala is a dynamic, concurrent, capability-based language that relies on three core capabilities: immutable values can be shared freely; isolated mutable objects can be transferred between threads but not aliased; local objects can be aliased within their owning thread but not dereferenced by other threads. Objects with capabilities can co-exist with unsafe objects, that are unchecked and may suffer data races, without compromising the safety of safe objects. We present a formal model of Dala, prove data race-freedom and state and prove a dynamic gradual guarantee. These theorems guarantee data race-freedom when using safe capabilities and show that the addition of capabilities is semantics preserving modulo permission and cast errors.
How does one compile derivatives of tensor programs, such that the resulting code is purely functional (hence easier to optimize and parallelize) and provably efficient relative to the original program? We show that naively differentiating tensor code---as done in popular systems like Tensorflow and PyTorch---can cause asymptotic slowdowns in pathological cases, violating the Cheap Gradients Principle. However, all existing automatic differentiation methods that guarantee this principle (for variable size data) do so by relying on += mutation through aliases/pointers---which complicates downstream optimization. We provide the first purely functional, provably efficient, adjoint/reverse-mode derivatives of array/tensor code by explicitly accounting for sparsity. We do this by focusing on the indicator function from Iversons APL. We also introduce a new Tensor SSA normal form and a new derivation of reverse-mode automatic differentiation based on the universal property of inner-products.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
