No Arabic abstract
Consider the following 2-respecting min-cut problem. Given a weighted graph $G$ and its spanning tree $T$, find the minimum cut among the cuts that contain at most two edges in $T$. This problem is an important subroutine in Kargers celebrated randomized near-linear-time min-cut algorithm [STOC96]. We present a new approach for this problem which can be easily implemented in many settings, leading to the following randomized min-cut algorithms for weighted graphs. * An $O(mfrac{log^2 n}{loglog n} + nlog^6 n)$-time sequential algorithm: This improves Kargers $O(m log^3 n)$ and $O(mfrac{(log^2 n)log (n^2/m)}{loglog n} + nlog^6 n)$ bounds when the input graph is not extremely sparse or dense. Improvements over Kargers bounds were previously known only under a rather strong assumption that the input graph is simple [Henzinger et al. SODA17; Ghaffari et al. SODA20]. For unweighted graphs with parallel edges, our bound can be improved to $O(mfrac{log^{1.5} n}{loglog n} + nlog^6 n)$. * An algorithm requiring $tilde O(n)$ cut queries to compute the min-cut of a weighted graph: This answers an open problem by Rubinstein et al. ITCS18, who obtained a similar bound for simple graphs. * A streaming algorithm that requires $tilde O(n)$ space and $O(log n)$ passes to compute the min-cut: The only previous non-trivial exact min-cut algorithm in this setting is the 2-pass $tilde O(n)$-space algorithm on simple graphs [Rubinstein et al., ITCS18] (observed by Assadi et al. STOC19). In contrast to Kargers 2-respecting min-cut algorithm which deploys sophisticated dynamic programming techniques, our approach exploits some cute structural properties so that it only needs to compute the values of $tilde O(n)$ cuts corresponding to removing $tilde O(n)$ pairs of tree edges, an operation that can be done quickly in many settings.
Minimum-weight cut (min-cut) is a basic measure of a networks connectivity strength. While the min-cut can be computed efficiently in the sequential setting [Karger STOC96], there was no efficient way for a distributed network to compute its own min-cut without limiting the input structure or dropping the output quality: In the standard CONGEST model, existing algorithms with nearly-optimal time (e.g. [Ghaffari, Kuhn, DISC13; Nanongkai, Su, DISC14]) can guarantee a solution that is $(1+epsilon)$-approximation at best while the exact $tilde O(n^{0.8}D^{0.2} + n^{0.9})$-time algorithm [Ghaffari, Nowicki, Thorup, SODA20] works only on *simple* networks (no weights and no parallel edges). Here $n$ and $D$ denote the networks number of vertices and hop-diameter, respectively. For the weighted case, the best bound was $tilde O(n)$ [Daga, Henzinger, Nanongkai, Saranurak, STOC19]. In this paper, we provide an *exact* $tilde O(sqrt n + D)$-time algorithm for computing min-cut on *weighted* networks. Our result improves even the previous algorithm that works only on simple networks. Its time complexity matches the known lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors. At the heart of our algorithm are a clever routing trick and two structural lemmas regarding the structure of a minimum cut of a graph. These two structural lemmas considerably strengthen and generalize the framework of Mukhopadhyay-Nanongkai [STOC20] and can be of independent interest.
In this work, we resolve the query complexity of global minimum cut problem for a graph by designing a randomized algorithm for approximating the size of minimum cut in a graph, where the graph can be accessed through local queries like {sc Degree}, {sc Neighbor}, and {sc Adjacency} queries. Given $epsilon in (0,1)$, the algorithm with high probability outputs an estimate $hat{t}$ satisfying the following $(1-epsilon) t leq hat{t} leq (1+epsilon) t$, where $m$ is the number of edges in the graph and $t$ is the size of minimum cut in the graph. The expected number of local queries used by our algorithm is $minleft{m+n,frac{m}{t}right}mbox{poly}left(log n,frac{1}{epsilon}right)$ where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph. Eden and Rosenbaum showed that $Omega(m/t)$ many local queries are required for approximating the size of minimum cut in graphs. These two results together resolve the query complexity of the problem of estimating the size of minimum cut in graphs using local queries. Building on the lower bound of Eden and Rosenbaum, we show that, for all $t in mathbb{N}$, $Omega(m)$ local queries are required to decide if the size of the minimum cut in the graph is $t$ or $t-2$. Also, we show that, for any $t in mathbb{N}$, $Omega(m)$ local queries are required to find all the minimum cut edges even if it is promised that the input graph has a minimum cut of size $t$. Both of our lower bound results are randomized, and hold even if we can make {sc Random Edge} query apart from local queries.
We present a practically efficient algorithm for maintaining a global minimum cut in large dynamic graphs under both edge insertions and deletions. While there has been theoretical work on this problem, our algorithm is the first implementation of a fully-dynamic algorithm. The algorithm uses the theoretical foundation and combines it with efficient and finely-tuned implementations to give an algorithm that can maintain the global minimum cut of a graph with rapid update times. We show that our algorithm gives up to multiple orders of magnitude speedup compared to static approaches both on edge insertions and deletions.
Given a graph $G=(V,E)$ with two distinguished vertices $s,tin V$ and an integer parameter $L>0$, an {em $L$-bounded cut} is a subset $F$ of edges (vertices) such that the every path between $s$ and $t$ in $Gsetminus F$ has length more than $L$. The task is to find an $L$-bounded cut of minimum cardinality. Though the problem is very simple to state and has been studied since the beginning of the 70s, it is not much understood yet. The problem is known to be $cal{NP}$-hard to approximate within a small constant factor even for $Lgeq 4$ (for $Lgeq 5$ for the vertex cuts). On the other hand, the best known approximation algorithm for general graphs has approximation ratio only $mathcal{O}({n^{2/3}})$ in the edge case, and $mathcal{O}({sqrt{n}})$ in the vertex case, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices. We show that for planar graphs, it is possible to solve both the edge- and the vertex-version of the problem optimally in time $mathcal{O}(L^{3L}n)$. That is, the problem is fixed parameter tractable (FPT) with respect to $L$ on planar graphs. Furthermore, we show that the problem remains FPT even for bounded genus graphs, a super class of planar graphs. Our second contribution deals with approximations of the vertex version of the problem. We describe an algorithm that for a given a graph $G$, its tree decomposition of treewidth $tau$ and vertices $s$ and $t$ computes a $tau$-approximation of the minimum $L$-bounded $s-t$ vertex cut; if the decomposition is not given, then the approximation ratio is $mathcal{O}(tau sqrt{log tau})$. For graphs with treewidth bounded by $mathcal{O}(n^{1/2-epsilon})$ for any $epsilon>0$, but not by a constant, this is the best approximation in terms of~$n$ that we are aware of.
We study two variants of textsc{Maximum Cut}, which we call textsc{Connected Maximum Cut} and textsc{Maximum Minimal Cut}, in this paper. In these problems, given an unweighted graph, the goal is to compute a maximum cut satisfying some connectivity requirements. Both problems are known to be NP-complete even on planar graphs whereas textsc{Maximum Cut} on planar graphs is solvable in polynomial time. We first show that these problems are NP-complete even on planar bipartite graphs and split graphs. Then we give parameterized algorithms using graph parameters such as clique-width, tree-width, and twin-cover number. Finally, we obtain FPT algorithms with respect to the solution size.