Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userLasserre Integrality Gaps for Graph Spanners and Related Problems
319
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Yasamin Nazari
Publication date
2019
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
There has been significant recent progress on algorithms for approximating graph spanners, i.e., algorithms which approximate the best spanner for a given input graph. Essentially all of these algorithms use the same basic LP relaxation, so a variety of papers have studied the limitations of this approach and proved integrality gaps for this LP in a variety of settings. We extend these results by showing that even the strongest lift-and-project methods cannot help significantly, by proving polynomial integrality gaps even for $n^{Omega(epsilon)}$ levels of the Lasserre hierarchy, for both the directed and undirected spanner problems. We also extend these integrality gaps to related problems, notably Directed Steiner Network and Shallow-Light Steiner Network.
rate research
Read More
We study the computational power of deciding whether a given truth-table can be described by a circuit of a given size (the Minimum Circuit Size Problem, or MCSP for short), and of the variant denoted as MKTP where circuit size is replaced by a polynomially-related Kolmogorov measure. All prior reductions from supposedly-intractable problems to MCSP / MKTP hinged on the power of MCSP / MKTP to distinguish random distributions from distributions produced by hardness-based pseudorandom generator constructions. We develop a fundamentally different approach inspired by the well-known interactive proof system for the complement of Graph Isomorphism (GI). It yields a randomized reduction with zero-sided error from GI to MKTP. We generalize the result and show that GI can be replaced by any isomorphism problem for which the underlying group satisfies some elementary properties. Instantiations include Linear Code Equivalence, Permutation Group Conjugacy, and Matrix Subspace Conjugacy. Along the way we develop encodings of isomorphism classes that are efficiently decodable and achieve compression that is at or near the information-theoretic optimum; those encodings may be of independent interest.
This tutorial review provides a guiding reference to researchers who want to have an overview of the large body of literature about graph spanners. It reviews the current literature covering various research streams about graph spanners, such as different formulations, sparsity and lightness results, computational complexity, dynamic algorithms, and applications. As an additional contribution, we offer a list of open problems on graph spanners.
We study the approximability of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) by linear programming (LP) relaxations. We show that for every CSP, the approximation obtained by a basic LP relaxation, is no weaker than the approximation obtained using relaxations given by $Omegaleft(frac{log n}{log log n}right)$ levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy on instances of size $n$. It was proved by Chan et al. [FOCS 2013] that any polynomial size LP extended formulation is no stronger than relaxations obtained by a super-constant levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy.. Combining this with our result also implies that any polynomial size LP extended formulation is no stronger than the basic LP. Using our techniques, we also simplify and strengthen the result by Khot et al. [STOC 2014] on (strong) approximation resistance for LPs. They provided a necessary and sufficient condition under which $Omega(log log n)$ levels of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy cannot achieve an approximation better than a random assignment. We simplify their proof and strengthen the bound to $Omegaleft(frac{log n}{log log n}right)$ levels.
Let $G$ be a graph on $n$ vertices and $mathrm{STAB}_k(G)$ be the convex hull of characteristic vectors of its independent sets of size at most $k$. We study extension complexity of $mathrm{STAB}_k(G)$ with respect to a fixed parameter $k$ (analogously to, e.g., parameterized computational complexity of problems). We show that for graphs $G$ from a class of bounded expansion it holds that $mathrm{xc}(mathrm{STAB}_k(G))leqslant mathcal{O}(f(k)cdot n)$ where the function $f$ depends only on the class. This result can be extended in a simple way to a wide range of similarly defined graph polytopes. In case of general graphs we show that there is {em no function $f$} such that, for all values of the parameter $k$ and for all graphs on $n$ vertices, the extension complexity of $mathrm{STAB}_k(G)$ is at most $f(k)cdot n^{mathcal{O}(1)}.$ While such results are not surprising since it is known that optimizing over $mathrm{STAB}_k(G)$ is $FPT$ for graphs of bounded expansion and $W[1]$-hard in general, they are also not trivial and in both cases stronger than the corresponding computational complexity results.
Given a set $P$ of $n$ points and a set $S$ of $m$ weighted disks in the plane, the disk coverage problem asks for a subset of disks of minimum total weight that cover all points of $P$. The problem is NP-hard. In this paper, we consider a line-constrained version in which all disks are centered on a line $L$ (while points of $P$ can be anywhere in the plane). We present an $O((m+n)log(m+n)+kappalog m)$ time algorithm for the problem, where $kappa$ is the number of pairs of disks that intersect. Alternatively, we can also solve the problem in $O(nmlog(m+n))$ time. For the unit-disk case where all disks have the same radius, the running time can be reduced to $O((n+m)log(m+n))$. In addition, we solve in $O((m+n)log(m+n))$ time the $L_{infty}$ and $L_1$ cases of the problem, in which the disks are squares and diamonds, respectively. As a by-product, the 1D version of the problem where all points of $P$ are on $L$ and the disks are line segments on $L$ is also solved in $O((m+n)log(m+n))$ time. We also show that the problem has an $Omega((m+n)log (m+n))$ time lower bound even for the 1D case. We further demonstrate that our techniques can also be used to solve other geometric coverage problems. For example, given in the plane a set $P$ of $n$ points and a set $S$ of $n$ weighted half-planes, we solve in $O(n^4log n)$ time the problem of finding a subset of half-planes to cover $P$ so that their total weight is minimized. This improves the previous best algorithm of $O(n^5)$ time by almost a linear factor. If all half-planes are lower ones, then our algorithm runs in $O(n^2log n)$ time, which improves the previous best algorithm of $O(n^4)$ time by almost a quadratic factor.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
