Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Powers Vs. Powers

81   0   0.0 ( 0 )
 Added by Pramod Sharma Dr.
 Publication date 2019
  fields
and research's language is English




Ask ChatGPT about the research

Let $ A subset B$ be rings. An ideal $ J subset B$ is called power stable in $A$ if $ J^n cap A = (Jcap A)^n$ for all $ ngeq 1$. Further, $J$ is called ultimately power stable in $A$ if $ J^n cap A = (Jcap A)^n$ for all $n$ large i.e., $ n gg 0$. In this note, our focus is to study these concepts for pair of rings $ R subset R[X]$ where $R$ is an integral domain. Some of the results we prove are: A maximal ideal $textbf{m}$ in $R[X]$ is power stable in $R$ if and only if $ wp^t $ is $ wp-$primary for all $ t geq 1$ for the prime ideal $wp = textbf{m}cap R$. We use this to prove that for a Hilbert domain $R$, any radical ideal in $R[X]$ which is a finite intersection of G-ideals is power stable in $R$. Further, we prove that if $R$ is a Noetherian integral domain of dimension 1 then any radical ideal in $R[X] $ is power stable in $R$, and if every ideal in $R[X]$ is power stable in $R$ then $R$ is a field. We also show that if $ A subset B$ are Noetherian rings, and $ I $ is an ideal in $B$ which is ultimately power stable in $A$, then if $ I cap A = J$ is a radical ideal generated by a regular $A$-sequence, it is power stable. Finally, we give a relationship in power stability and ultimate power stability using the concept of reduction of an ideal (Theorem 3.22).



rate research

Read More

This paper is concerned with the question of whether geometric structures such as cell complexes can be used to simultaneously describe the minimal free resolutions of all powers of a monomial ideal. We provide a full answer in the case of square-free monomial ideals of projective dimension one, by introducing a combinatorial construction of a family of (cubical) cell complexes whose 1-skeletons are powers of a graph that supports the resolution of the ideal.
We compute the Betti numbers for all the powers of initial and final lexsegment edge ideals. For the powers of the edge ideal of an anti-$d-$path, we prove that they have linear quotients and we characterize the normally torsion-free ideals. We determine a class of non-squarefree ideals, arising from some particular graphs, which are normally torsion-free.
Let $A = K[X_1,ldots, X_d]$ and let $I$, $J$ be monomial ideals in $A$. Let $I_n(J) = (I^n colon J^infty)$ be the $n^{th}$ symbolic power of $I$ wrt $J$. It is easy to see that the function $f^I_J(n) = e_0(I_n(J)/I^n)$ is of quasi-polynomial type, say of period $g$ and degree $c$. For $n gg 0$ say [ f^I_J(n) = a_c(n)n^c + a_{c-1}(n)n^{c-1} + text{lower terms}, ] where for $i = 0, ldots, c$, $a_i colon mathbb{N} rt mathbb{Z}$ are periodic functions of period $g$ and $a_c eq 0$. In an earlier paper we (together with Herzog and Verma) proved that $dim I_n(J)/I^n$ is constant for $n gg 0$ and $a_c(-)$ is a constant. In this paper we prove that if $I$ is generated by some elements of the same degree and height $I geq 2$ then $a_{c-1}(-)$ is also a constant.
This note has two goals. The first is to give a short and self contained introduction to the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity for standard graded ring $R$ over a general base ring. The second is to present a simple and concise proof of a classical result due to Cutkosky, Herzog and Trung and, independently, to Kodiyalam asserting that the regularity of powers of an homogeneous ideal $I$ of $R$ is eventually a linear function in $v$. Finally we show how the flexibility of the definition of the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity over general base rings can be used to give a simple characterization of the ideals whose powers have a linear resolution in terms of the regularity of the Rees ring.
Let $G$ be a simple graph and $I$ its edge ideal. We prove that $${rm reg}(I^{(s)}) = {rm reg}(I^s)$$ for $s = 2,3$, where $I^{(s)}$ is the $s$-th symbolic power of $I$. As a consequence, we prove the following bounds begin{align*} {rm reg} I^{s} & le {rm reg} I + 2s - 2, text{ for } s = 2,3, {rm reg} I^{(s)} & le {rm reg} I + 2s - 2,text{ for } s = 2,3,4. end{align*}
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا