Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userOn the Influence of Bias-Correction on Distributed Stochastic Optimization
119
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Kun Yuan
Publication date
2019
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Various bias-correction methods such as EXTRA, gradient tracking methods, and exact diffusion have been proposed recently to solve distributed {em deterministic} optimization problems. These methods employ constant step-sizes and converge linearly to the {em exact} solution under proper conditions. However, their performance under stochastic and adaptive settings is less explored. It is still unknown {em whether}, {em when} and {em why} these bias-correction methods can outperform their traditional counterparts (such as consensus and diffusion) with noisy gradient and constant step-sizes. This work studies the performance of exact diffusion under the stochastic and adaptive setting, and provides conditions under which exact diffusion has superior steady-state mean-square deviation (MSD) performance than traditional algorithms without bias-correction. In particular, it is proven that this superiority is more evident over sparsely-connected network topologies such as lines, cycles, or grids. Conditions are also provided under which exact diffusion method match or may even degrade the performance of traditional methods. Simulations are provided to validate the theoretical findings.
rate research
Read More
We study asynchronous finite sum minimization in a distributed-data setting with a central parameter server. While asynchrony is well understood in parallel settings where the data is accessible by all machines -- e.g., modifications of variance-reduced gradient algorithms like SAGA work well -- little is known for the distributed-data setting. We develop an algorithm ADSAGA based on SAGA for the distributed-data setting, in which the data is partitioned between many machines. We show that with $m$ machines, under a natural stochastic delay model with an mean delay of $m$, ADSAGA converges in $tilde{O}left(left(n + sqrt{m}kapparight)log(1/epsilon)right)$ iterations, where $n$ is the number of component functions, and $kappa$ is a condition number. This complexity sits squarely between the complexity $tilde{O}left(left(n + kapparight)log(1/epsilon)right)$ of SAGA textit{without delays} and the complexity $tilde{O}left(left(n + mkapparight)log(1/epsilon)right)$ of parallel asynchronous algorithms where the delays are textit{arbitrary} (but bounded by $O(m)$), and the data is accessible by all. Existing asynchronous algorithms with distributed-data setting and arbitrary delays have only been shown to converge in $tilde{O}(n^2kappalog(1/epsilon))$ iterations. We empirically compare on least-squares problems the iteration complexity and wallclock performance of ADSAGA to existing parallel and distributed algorithms, including synchronous minibatch algorithms. Our results demonstrate the wallclock advantage of variance-reduced asynchronous approaches over SGD or synchronous approaches.
We consider practical data characteristics underlying federated learning, where unbalanced and non-i.i.d. data from clients have a block-cyclic structure: each cycle contains several blocks, and each clients training data follow block-specific and non-i.i.d. distributions. Such a data structure would introduce client and block biases during the collaborative training: the single global model would be biased towards the client or block specific data. To overcome the biases, we propose two new distributed optimization algorithms called multi-model parallel SGD (MM-PSGD) and multi-chain parallel SGD (MC-PSGD) with a convergence rate of $O(1/sqrt{NT})$, achieving a linear speedup with respect to the total number of clients. In particular, MM-PSGD adopts the block-mixed training strategy, while MC-PSGD further adds the block-separate training strategy. Both algorithms create a specific predictor for each block by averaging and comparing the historical global models generated in this block from different cycles. We extensively evaluate our algorithms over the CIFAR-10 dataset. Evaluation results demonstrate that our algorithms significantly outperform the conventional federated averaging algorithm in terms of test accuracy, and also preserve robustness for the variance of critical parameters.
In the last few years, various communication compression techniques have emerged as an indispensable tool helping to alleviate the communication bottleneck in distributed learning. However, despite the fact {em biased} compressors often show superior performance in practice when compared to the much more studied and understood {em unbiased} compressors, very little is known about them. In this work we study three classes of biased compression operators, two of which are new, and their performance when applied to (stochastic) gradient descent and distributed (stochastic) gradient descent. We show for the first time that biased compressors can lead to linear convergence rates both in the single node and distributed settings. Our {em distributed} SGD method enjoys the ergodic rate $mathcal{O}left(frac{delta L exp(-K) }{mu} + frac{(C + D)}{Kmu}right)$, where $delta$ is a compression parameter which grows when more compression is applied, $L$ and $mu$ are the smoothness and strong convexity constants, $C$ captures stochastic gradient noise ($C=0$ if full gradients are computed on each node) and $D$ captures the variance of the gradients at the optimum ($D=0$ for over-parameterized models). Further, via a theoretical study of several synthetic and empirical distributions of communicated gradients, we shed light on why and by how much biased compressors outperform their unbiased variants. Finally, we propose a new highly performing biased compressor---combination of Top-$k$ and natural dithering---which in our experiments outperforms all other compression techniques.
We consider distributed optimization under communication constraints for training deep learning models. We propose a new algorithm, whose parameter updates rely on two forces: a regular gradient step, and a corrective direction dictated by the currently best-performing worker (leader). Our method differs from the parameter-averaging scheme EASGD in a number of ways: (i) our objective formulation does not change the location of stationary points compared to the original optimization problem; (ii) we avoid convergence decelerations caused by pulling local workers descending to different local minima to each other (i.e. to the average of their parameters); (iii) our update by design breaks the curse of symmetry (the phenomenon of being trapped in poorly generalizing sub-optimal solutions in symmetric non-convex landscapes); and (iv) our approach is more communication efficient since it broadcasts only parameters of the leader rather than all workers. We provide theoretical analysis of the batch version of the proposed algorithm, which we call Leader Gradient Descent (LGD), and its stochastic variant (LSGD). Finally, we implement an asynchronous version of our algorithm and extend it to the multi-leader setting, where we form groups of workers, each represented by its own local leader (the best performer in a group), and update each worker with a corrective direction comprised of two attractive forces: one to the local, and one to the global leader (the best performer among all workers). The multi-leader setting is well-aligned with current hardware architecture, where local workers forming a group lie within a single computational node and different groups correspond to different nodes. For training convolutional neural networks, we empirically demonstrate that our approach compares favorably to state-of-the-art baselines.
In decentralized optimization, it is common algorithmic practice to have nodes interleave (local) gradient descent iterations with gossip (i.e. averaging over the network) steps. Motivated by the training of large-scale machine learning models, it is also increasingly common to require that messages be {em lossy compresse
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
