Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userExtrapolating Treatment Effects in Multi-Cutoff Regression Discontinuity Designs
73
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
In non-experimental settings, the Regression Discontinuity (RD) design is one of the most credible identification strategies for program evaluation and causal inference. However, RD treatment effect estimands are necessarily local, making statistical methods for the extrapolation of these effects a key area for development. We introduce a new method for extrapolation of RD effects that relies on the presence of multiple cutoffs, and is therefore design-based. Our approach employs an easy-to-interpret identifying assumption that mimics the idea of common trends in difference-in-differences designs. We illustrate our methods with data on a subsidized loan program on post-education attendance in Colombia, and offer new evidence on program effects for students with test scores away from the cutoff that determined program eligibility.
rate research
Read More
Regression discontinuity (RD) design in a practical context is often contaminated by units behavior to manipulate their treatment assignment. However, we have no formal justification for point identification in such a contaminated RD design. Diagnostic tests have been proposed to detect manipulations, but they do not guarantee identification without some auxiliary assumptions, and the auxiliary assumptions have not been proposed. This study proposes a set of restrictions for possibly manipulated RD designs to validate point identification and diagnostic tests. The same restrictions simultaneously validate worst-case bounds when the diagnostic tests are validated. Therefore, our designs are manipulation robust in testing and identification. The worst-case bounds have two shorter bounds as special cases, and we apply special-case bounds to a controversy regarding the incumbency margin study of the U.S. House of Representatives elections studied in Lee (2008).
Instrumental variables (IV) regression is a popular method for the estimation of the endogenous treatment effects. Conventional IV methods require all the instruments are relevant and valid. However, this is impractical especially in high-dimensional models when we consider a large set of candidate IVs. In this paper, we propose an IV estimator robust to the existence of both the invalid and irrelevant instruments (called R2IVE) for the estimation of endogenous treatment effects. This paper extends the scope of Kang et al. (2016) by considering a true high-dimensional IV model and a nonparametric reduced form equation. It is shown that our procedure can select the relevant and valid instruments consistently and the proposed R2IVE is root-n consistent and asymptotically normal. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that the R2IVE performs favorably compared to the existing high-dimensional IV estimators (such as, NAIVE (Fan and Zhong, 2018) and sisVIVE (Kang et al., 2016)) when invalid instruments exist. In the empirical study, we revisit the classic question of trade and growth (Frankel and Romer, 1999).
We study the causal interpretation of regressions on multiple dependent treatments and flexible controls. Such regressions are often used to analyze randomized control trials with multiple intervention arms, and to estimate institutional quality (e.g. teacher value-added) with observational data. We show that, unlike with a single binary treatment, these regressions do not generally estimate convex averages of causal effects-even when the treatments are conditionally randomly assigned and the controls fully address omitted variables bias. We discuss different solutions to this issue, and propose as a solution anew class of efficient estimators of weighted average treatment effects.
This paper discusses the problem of estimation and inference on the effects of time-varying treatment. We propose a method for inference on the effects treatment histories, introducing a dynamic covariate balancing method combined with penalized regression. Our approach allows for (i) treatments to be assigned based on arbitrary past information, with the propensity score being unknown; (ii) outcomes and time-varying covariates to depend on treatment trajectories; (iii) high-dimensional covariates; (iv) heterogeneity of treatment effects. We study the asymptotic properties of the estimator, and we derive the parametric convergence rate of the proposed procedure. Simulations and an empirical application illustrate the advantage of the method over state-of-the-art competitors.
Datasets from field experiments with covariate-adaptive randomizations (CARs) usually contain extra baseline covariates in addition to the strata indicators. We propose to incorporate these extra covariates via auxiliary regressions in the estimation and inference of unconditional QTEs under CARs. We establish the consistency, limiting distribution, and validity of the multiplier bootstrap of the regression-adjusted QTE estimator. The auxiliary regression may be estimated parametrically, nonparametrically, or via regularization when the data are high-dimensional. Even when the auxiliary regression is misspecified, the proposed bootstrap inferential procedure still achieves the nominal rejection probability in the limit under the null. When the auxiliary regression is correctly specified, the regression-adjusted estimator achieves the minimum asymptotic variance. We also derive the optimal pseudo true values for the potentially misspecified parametric model that minimize the asymptotic variance of the corresponding QTE estimator. We demonstrate the finite sample performance of the new estimation and inferential methods using simulations and provide an empirical application to a well-known dataset in education.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
