Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe Magnification Invariant of Circularly-symmetric Lens Models
84
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
In the context of strong gravitational lensing, the magnification of image is of crucial importance to constrain various lens models. For several commonly used quadruple lens models, the magnification invariants, defined as the sum of the signed magnifications of images, have been analytically derived when the image multiplicity is a maximum. In this paper, we further study the magnification of several disk lens models, including (a) exponential disk lens, (b) Gaussian disk lens, (c) modified Hubble profile lens, and another two of the popular three-dimensional symmetrical lens model, (d) NFW lens and (e) Einasto lens. We find that magnification invariant does also exist for each lens model. Moreover, our results show that magnification invariants can be significantly changed by the characteristic surface mass density $kappa_{rm c}$.
rate research
Read More
We present strong-lensing models, as well as mass and magnification maps, for the cores of the six HST Frontier Fields galaxy clusters. Our parametric lens models are constrained by the locations and redshifts of multiple image systems of lensed background galaxies. We use a combination of photometric redshifts and spectroscopic redshifts of the lensed background sources obtained by us (for Abell 2744 and Abell S1063), collected from the literature, or kindly provided by the lensing community. Using our results, we (1) compare the derived mass distribution of each cluster to its light distribution, (2) quantify the cumulative magnification power of the HFF clusters, (3) describe how our models can be used to estimate the magnification and image multiplicity of lensed background sources at all redshifts and at any position within the cluster cores, and (4) discuss systematic effects and caveats resulting from our modeling methods. We specifically investigate the effect of the use of spectroscopic and photometric redshift constraints on the uncertainties of the resulting models. We find that the photometric redshift estimates of lensed galaxies are generally in excellent agreement with spectroscopic redshifts, where available. However, the flexibility associated with relaxed redshift priors may cause the complexity of large-scale structure that is needed to account for the lensing signal to be underestimated. Our findings thus underline the importance of spectroscopic arc redshifts, or tight photometric redshift constraints, for high precision lens models. All products from our best-fit lens models (magnification, convergence, shear, deflection field) and model simulations for estimating errors are made available via the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes.
Using the power of gravitational lensing magnification by massive galaxy clusters, the Hubble Frontier Fields provide deep views of six patches of the high redshift Universe. The combination of deep Hubble imaging and exceptional lensing strength has revealed the greatest numbers of multiply-imaged galaxies available to constrain models of cluster mass distributions. However, even with $mathcal{O}(100)$ images per cluster, the uncertainties associated with the reconstructions are not negligible. The goal of this paper is to show the diversity of model magnification predictions. We examine 7 and 9 mass models of Abell 2744 and MACS J0416, respectively, submitted to the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes for public distribution in September 2015. The dispersion between model predictions increases from 30% at common low magnifications ($musim2$) to 70% at rare high magnifications ($musim40$). MACS J0416 exhibits smaller dispersions than Abell 2744 for $2<mu<10$. We show that magnification maps based on different lens inversion techniques typically differ from each other by more than their quoted statistical errors. This suggests that some models underestimate the true uncertainties, which are primarily due to various lensing degeneracies. Though the exact mass sheet degeneracy is broken, its generalized counterpart is not broken at least in Abell 2744. Other, local degeneracies are also present in both clusters. Our comparison of models is complementary to the comparison of reconstructions of known synthetic mass distributions. By focusing on observed clusters, we can identify those that are best constrained, and therefore provide the clearest view of the distant Universe.
The mass of a cluster of galaxies can be estimated from its lens magnification, which can be determined from the variation in number counts of background galaxies. In order to derive the mass one needs to make assumptions for the lens shear, which is unknown from the variation in number counts alone. Furthermore, one needs to go beyond the weak lensing (linear) approximation as most of the observational data is concentrated in the central parts of clusters, where the lensing is strong. By studying the lensing properties of a complete catalogue of galaxy cluster models, one can find reasonable approximations about the lens shear as a function of the lens convergence. We show that using these approximations one can fairly well reconstruct the surface mass distribution from the magnification alone.
The surface mass density of a cluster of galaxies, and thus its total mass, can be estimated from its lens magnification. The magnification can be determined from the variation in number counts of its background galaxies. In the weak lensing approximation the surface mass density is a linear function of the magnification. However, most observational data is concentrated in the central parts of clusters, so one needs to go beyond the weak lensing approximation, and consider the lens shear as well, which is unknown from the variation in number counts alone. We studied the lensing properties of a catalogue of numerical cluster models in order to find the best possible approximation for the shear which still allows straightforward determination of the surface mass density. We show that by using such an approximation one can fairly well reconstruct the surface mass distribution from the magnification alone. It is demonstrated that the mass estimated using the weak lens magnification approximation is usually at least twice the true mass. We illustrate our technique on existing data, and show that the resulting masses compare well to other estimates.
We present the first application of lens magnification to measure the absolute mass of a galaxy cluster; Abell 1689. The absolute mass of a galaxy cluster can be measured by the gravitational lens magnification of a background galaxy population by the cluster potential. The lensing signal is complicated by the variation in number counts due to galaxy clustering and shot-noise, and by additional uncertainties in relating magnification to mass in the strong lensing regime. Clustering and shot-noise can be dealt with using maximum likelihood methods. Local approximations can then be used to estimate the mass from magnification. Alternatively if the lens is axially symmetric we show that the amplification equation can be solved nonlocally for the surface mass density and the tangential shear. In this paper we present the first maps of the total mass distribution in Abell 1689, measured from the deficit of lensed red galaxies behind the cluster. Although noisier, these reproduce the main features of mass maps made using the shear distortion of background galaxies but have the correct normalisation, finally breaking the ``sheet-mass degeneracy that has plagued lensing methods based on shear. We derive the cluster mass profile in the inner 4 (0.48 Mpc/h). These show a profile with a near isothermal surface mass density kappa = (0.5+/-0.1)(theta/1)^{-1} out to a radius of 2.4 (0.28Mpc/h), followed by a sudden drop into noise. We find that the projected mass interior to 0.24 h^{-1}$Mpc is M(<0.24 Mpc/h)=(0.50+/- 0.09) times 10^{15} Msol/h. We compare our results with masses estimated from X-ray temperatures and line-of-sight velocity dispersions, as well as weak shear and lensing arclets and find all are in fair agreement for Abell 1698.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
