Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userOracle Complexity of Second-Order Methods for Finite-Sum Problems
112
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Yossi Arjevani
Publication date
2016
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Finite-sum optimization problems are ubiquitous in machine learning, and are commonly solved using first-order methods which rely on gradient computations. Recently, there has been growing interest in emph{second-order} methods, which rely on both gradients and Hessians. In principle, second-order methods can require much fewer iterations than first-order methods, and hold the promise for more efficient algorithms. Although computing and manipulating Hessians is prohibitive for high-dimensional problems in general, the Hessians of individual functions in finite-sum problems can often be efficiently computed, e.g. because they possess a low-rank structure. Can second-order information indeed be used to solve such problems more efficiently? In this paper, we provide evidence that the answer -- perhaps surprisingly -- is negative, at least in terms of worst-case guarantees. However, we also discuss what additional assumptions and algorithmic approaches might potentially circumvent this negative result.
rate research
Read More
We consider the nonsmooth convex composition optimization problem where the objective is a composition of two finite-sum functions and analyze stochastic compositional variance reduced gradient (SCVRG) methods for them. SCVRG and its variants have recently drawn much attention given their edge over stochastic compositional gradient descent (SCGD); but the theoretical analysis exclusively assumes strong convexity of the objective, which excludes several important examples such as Lasso, logistic regression, principle component analysis and deep neural nets. In contrast, we prove non-asymptotic incremental first-order oracle (IFO) complexity of SCVRG or its novel variants for nonsmooth convex composition optimization and show that they are provably faster than SCGD and gradient descent. More specifically, our method achieves the total IFO complexity of $Oleft((m+n)logleft(1/epsilonright)+1/epsilon^3right)$ which improves that of $Oleft(1/epsilon^{3.5}right)$ and $Oleft((m+n)/sqrt{epsilon}right)$ obtained by SCGD and accelerated gradient descent (AGD) respectively. Experimental results confirm that our methods outperform several existing methods, e.g., SCGD and AGD, on sparse mean-variance optimization problem.
On solving a convex-concave bilinear saddle-point problem (SPP), there have been many works studying the complexity results of first-order methods. These results are all about upper complexity bounds, which can determine at most how many efforts would guarantee a solution of desired accuracy. In this paper, we pursue the opposite direction by deriving lower complexity bounds of first-order methods on large-scale SPPs. Our results apply to the methods whose iterates are in the linear span of past first-order information, as well as more general methods that produce their iterates in an arbitrary manner based on first-order information. We first work on the affinely constrained smooth convex optimization that is a special case of SPP. Different from gradient method on unconstrained problems, we show that first-order methods on affinely constrained problems generally cannot be accelerated from the known convergence rate $O(1/t)$ to $O(1/t^2)$, and in addition, $O(1/t)$ is optimal for convex problems. Moreover, we prove that for strongly convex problems, $O(1/t^2)$ is the best possible convergence rate, while it is known that gradient methods can have linear convergence on unconstrained problems. Then we extend these results to general SPPs. It turns out that our lower complexity bounds match with several established upper complexity bounds in the literature, and thus they are tight and indicate the optimality of several existing first-order methods.
We study the conditions under which one is able to efficiently apply variance-reduction and acceleration schemes on finite sum optimization problems. First, we show that, perhaps surprisingly, the finite sum structure by itself, is not sufficient for obtaining a complexity bound of $tilde{cO}((n+L/mu)ln(1/epsilon))$ for $L$-smooth and $mu$-strongly convex individual functions - one must also know which individual function is being referred to by the oracle at each iteration. Next, we show that for a broad class of first-order and coordinate-descent finite sum algorithms (including, e.g., SDCA, SVRG, SAG), it is not possible to get an `accelerated complexity bound of $tilde{cO}((n+sqrt{n L/mu})ln(1/epsilon))$, unless the strong convexity parameter is given explicitly. Lastly, we show that when this class of algorithms is used for minimizing $L$-smooth and convex finite sums, the optimal complexity bound is $tilde{cO}(n+L/epsilon)$, assuming that (on average) the same update rule is used in every iteration, and $tilde{cO}(n+sqrt{nL/epsilon})$, otherwise.
We propose a primal-dual interior-point method (IPM) with convergence to second-order stationary points (SOSPs) of nonlinear semidefinite optimization problems, abbreviated as NSDPs. As far as we know, the current algorithms for NSDPs only ensure convergence to first-order stationary points such as Karush-Kuhn-Tucker points. The proposed method generates a sequence approximating SOSPs while minimizing a primal-dual merit function for NSDPs by using scaled gradient directions and directions of negative curvature. Under some assumptions, the generated sequence accumulates at an SOSP with a worst-case iteration complexity. This result is also obtained for a primal IPM with slight modification. Finally, our numerical experiments show the benefits of using directions of negative curvature in the proposed method.
We provide improved convergence rates for various emph{non-smooth} optimization problems via higher-order accelerated methods. In the case of $ell_infty$ regression, we achieves an $O(epsilon^{-4/5})$ iteration complexity, breaking the $O(epsilon^{-1})$ barrier so far present for previous methods. We arrive at a similar rate for the problem of $ell_1$-SVM, going beyond what is attainable by first-order methods with prox-oracle access for non-smooth non-strongly convex problems. We further show how to achieve even faster rates by introducing higher-order regularization. Our results rely on recent advances in near-optimal accelerated methods for higher-order smooth convex optimization. In particular, we extend Nesterovs smoothing technique to show that the standard softmax approximation is not only smooth in the usual sense, but also emph{higher-order} smooth. With this observation in hand, we provide the first example of higher-order acceleration techniques yielding faster rates for emph{non-smooth} optimization, to the best of our knowledge.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
