No Arabic abstract
We consider a pseudo-marginal Metropolis--Hastings kernel $P_m$ that is constructed using an average of $m$ exchangeable random variables, as well as an analogous kernel $P_s$ that averages $s<m$ of these same random variables. Using an embedding technique to facilitate comparisons, we show that the asymptotic variances of ergodic averages associated with $P_m$ are lower bounded in terms of those associated with $P_s$. We show that the bound provided is tight and disprove a conjecture that when the random variables to be averaged are independent, the asymptotic variance under $P_m$ is never less than $s/m$ times the variance under $P_s$. The conjecture does, however, hold when considering continuous-time Markov chains. These results imply that if the computational cost of the algorithm is proportional to $m$, it is often better to set $m=1$. We provide intuition as to why these findings differ so markedly from recent results for pseudo-marginal kernels employing particle filter approximations. Our results are exemplified through two simulation studies; in the first the computational cost is effectively proportional to $m$ and in the second there is a considerable start-up cost at each iteration.
This paper discusses the challenges presented by tall data problems associated with Bayesian classification (specifically binary classification) and the existing methods to handle them. Current methods include parallelizing the likelihood, subsampling, and consensus Monte Carlo. A new method based on the two-stage Metropolis-Hastings algorithm is also proposed. The purpose of this algorithm is to reduce the exact likelihood computational cost in the tall data situation. In the first stage, a new proposal is tested by the approximate likelihood based model. The full likelihood based posterior computation will be conducted only if the proposal passes the first stage screening. Furthermore, this method can be adopted into the consensus Monte Carlo framework. The two-stage method is applied to logistic regression, hierarchical logistic regression, and Bayesian multivariate adaptive regression splines.
We develop a Bayesian inference method for diffusions observed discretely and with noise, which is free of discretisation bias. Unlike existing unbiased inference methods, our method does not rely on exact simulation techniques. Instead, our method uses standard time-discretised approximations of diffusions, such as the Euler--Maruyama scheme. Our approach is based on particle marginal Metropolis--Hastings, a particle filter, randomised multilevel Monte Carlo, and importance sampling type correction of approximate Markov chain Monte Carlo. The resulting estimator leads to inference without a bias from the time-discretisation as the number of Markov chain iterations increases. We give convergence results and recommend allocations for algorithm inputs. Our method admits a straightforward parallelisation, and can be computationally efficient. The user-friendly approach is illustrated on three examples, where the underlying diffusion is an Ornstein--Uhlenbeck process, a geometric Brownian motion, and a 2d non-reversible Langevin equation.
We propose a new kernel for Metropolis Hastings called Directional Metropolis Hastings (DMH) with multivariate update where the proposal kernel has state dependent covariance matrix. We use the derivative of the target distribution at the current state to change the orientation of the proposal distribution, therefore producing a more plausible proposal. We study the conditions for geometric ergodicity of our algorithm and provide necessary and sufficient conditions for convergence. We also suggest a scheme for adaptively update the variance parameter and study the conditions of ergodicity of the adaptive algorithm. We demonstrate the performance of our algorithm in a Bayesian generalized linear model problem.
This paper develops a Bayesian computational platform at the interface between posterior sampling and optimization in models whose marginal likelihoods are difficult to evaluate. Inspired by adversarial optimization, namely Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), we reframe the likelihood function estimation problem as a classification problem. Pitting a Generator, who simulates fake data, against a Classifier, who tries to distinguish them from the real data, one obtains likelihood (ratio) estimators which can be plugged into the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The resulting Markov chains generate, at a steady state, samples from an approximate posterior whose asymptotic properties we characterize. Drawing upon connections with empirical Bayes and Bayesian mis-specification, we quantify the convergence rate in terms of the contraction speed of the actual posterior and the convergence rate of the Classifier. Asymptotic normality results are also provided which justify inferential potential of our approach. We illustrate the usefulness of our approach on examples which have posed a challenge for existing Bayesian likelihood-free approaches.
This article addresses the problem of efficient Bayesian inference in dynamic systems using particle methods and makes a number of contributions. First, we develop a correlated pseudo-marginal (CPM) approach for Bayesian inference in state space (SS) models that is based on filtering the disturbances, rather than the states. This approach is useful when the state transition density is intractable or inefficient to compute, and also when the dimension of the disturbance is lower than the dimension of the state. Second, we propose a block pseudo-marginal (BPM) method that uses as the estimate of the likelihood the average of G independent unbiased estimates of the likelihood. We associate a set of underlying uniform of standard normal random numbers used to construct each of the individual unbiased likelihood estimates and then use component-wise Markov Chain Monte Carlo to update the parameter vector jointly with one set of these random numbers at a time. This induces a correlation of approximately 1-1/G between the logs of the estimated likelihood at the proposed and current values of the model parameters. Third, we show for some non-stationary state space models that the BPM approach is much more efficient than the CPM approach, because it is difficult to translate the high correlation in the underlying random numbers to high correlation between the logs of the likelihood estimates. Although our focus has been on applying the BPM method to state space models, our results and approach can be used in a wide range of applications of the PM method, such as panel data models, subsampling problems and approximate Bayesian computation.