Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userA comparison between methods of analytical continuation for bosonic functions
75
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Johan Sch\\\"ott JS
Publication date
2016
fields
Physics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
In this article we perform a critical assessment of different known methods for the analytical continuation of bosonic functions, namely the maximum entropy method, the non-negative least-square method, the non-negative Tikhonov method, the Pade approximant method, and a stochastic sampling method. Three functions of different shape are investigated, corresponding to three physically relevant scenarios. They include a simple two-pole model function and two flavours of the non-interacting Hubbard model on a square lattice, i.e. a single-orbital metallic system and a two-orbitals insulating system. The effect of numerical noise in the input data on the analytical continuation is discussed in detail. Overall, the stochastic method by Mishchenko et al. [Phys. Rev. B textbf{62}, 6317 (2000)] is shown to be the most reliable tool for input data whose numerical precision is not known. For high precision input data, this approach is slightly outperformed by the Pade approximant method, which combines a good resolution power with a good numerical stability. Although none of the methods retrieves all features in the spectra in the presence of noise, our analysis provides a useful guideline for obtaining reliable information of the spectral function in cases of practical interest.
rate research
Read More
Finite-temperature quantum field theories are formulated in terms of Greens functions and self-energies on the Matsubara axis. In multi-orbital systems, these quantities are related to positive semidefinite matrix-valued functions of the Caratheodory and Schur class. Analysis, interpretation and evaluation of derived quantities such as real-frequency response functions requires analytic continuation of the off-diagonal elements to the real axis. We derive the criteria under which such functions exist for given Matsubara data and present an interpolation algorithm that intrinsically respects their mathematical properties. For small systems with precise Matsubara data, we find that the continuation exactly recovers all off-diagonal and diagonal elements. In real-materials systems, we show that the precision of the continuation is sufficient for the analytic continuation to commute with the Dyson equation, and we show that the commonly used truncation of off-diagonal self-energy elements leads to considerable approximation artifacts. Our method paves the way for the systematic evaluation of Matsubara data with equations of many-body theory on the real-frequency axis.
Bayesian parametric analytic continuation (BPAC) is proposed for the analytic continuation of noisy imaginary-time Greens function data as, e.g., obtained by continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo simulations (CTQMC). Within BPAC, the spectral function is inferred from a suitable set of parametrized basis functions. Bayesian model comparison then allows to assess the reliability of different parametrizations. The required evidence integrals of such a model comparison are determined by nested sampling. Compared to the maximum entropy method (MEM), routinely used for the analytic continuation of CTQMC data, the presented approach allows to infer whether the data support specific structures of the spectral function. We demonstrate the capability of BPAC in terms of CTQMC data for an Anderson impurity model (AIM) that shows a generalized Kondo scenario and compare the BPAC reconstruction to the MEM as well as to the spectral function obtained from the real-time fork tensor product state impurity solver where no analytic continuation is required. Furthermore, we present a combination of MEM and BPAC and its application to an AIM arising from the ab initio treatment of SrVO$_3$.
We compare the efficiency of different matrix product state (MPS) based methods for the calculation of two-time correlation functions in open quantum systems. The methods are the purification approach [1] and two approaches [2,3] based on the Monte-Carlo wave function (MCWF) sampling of stochastic quantum trajectories using MPS techniques. We consider a XXZ spin chain either exposed to dephasing noise or to a dissipative local spin flip. We find that the preference for one of the approaches in terms of numerical efficiency depends strongly on the specific form of dissipation.
In the long-time pursuit of the solution to calculate the partition function (or free energy) of condensed matter, Monte-Carlo-based nested sampling should be the state-of-the-art method, and very recently, we established a direct integral approach that works at least four orders faster. In present work, the above two methods were applied to solid argon at temperatures up to $300$K, and the derived internal energy and pressure were compared with the molecular dynamics simulation as well as experimental measurements, showing that the calculation precision of our approach is about 10 times higher than that of the nested sampling method.
In this work we analyze the variational problem emerging from the Gutzwiller approach to strongly correlated systems. This problem comprises the two main steps: evaluation and minimization of the ground state energy $W$ for the postulated Gutzwiller Wave Function (GWF). We discuss the available methods for evaluating $W$, in particular the recently proposed diagrammatic expansion method. We compare the two existing approaches to minimize $W$: the standard approach based on the effective single-particle Hamiltonian (EH) and the so-called Statistically-consistent Gutzwiller Approximation (SGA). On the example of the superconducting phase analysis we show that these approaches lead to the same minimum as it should be. However, the calculations within the SGA method are easier to perform and the two approaches allow for a simple cross-check of the obtained results. Finally, we show two ways of solving the equations resulting from the variational procedure, as well as how to incorporate the condition for a fixed number of particles.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
