No Arabic abstract
This paper develops the idea of homology for 1-parameter families of topological spaces. We express parametrized homology as a collection of real intervals with each corresponding to a homological feature supported over that interval or, equivalently, as a persistence diagram. By defining persistence in terms of finite rectangle measures, we classify barcode intervals into four classes. Each of these conveys how the homological features perish at both ends of the interval over which they are defined.
In many scientific and technological contexts we have only a poor understanding of the structure and details of appropriate mathematical models. We often, therefore, need to compare different models. With available data we can use formal statistical model selection to compare and contrast the ability of different mathematical models to describe such data. There is, however, a lack of rigorous methods to compare different models emph{a priori}. Here we develop and illustrate two such approaches that allow us to compare model structures in a systematic way {by representing models in terms of simplicial complexes}. Using well-developed concepts from simplicial algebraic topology, we define a distance between models based on their simplicial representations. Employing persistent homology with a flat filtration provides for alternative representations of the models as persistence intervals, which represent the structure of the models, from which we can also obtain the distances between models. We then expand on this measure of model distance to study the concept of model equivalence in order to determine the conceptual similarity of models. We apply our methodology for model comparison to demonstrate an equivalence between a positional-information model and a Turing-pattern model from developmental biology, constituting a novel observation for two classes of models that were previously regarded as unrelated.
We introduce a refinement of the persistence diagram, the graded persistence diagram. It is the Mobius inversion of the graded rank function, which is obtained from the rank function using the unary numeral system. Both persistence diagrams and graded persistence diagrams are integer-valued functions on the Cartesian plane. Whereas the persistence diagram takes non-negative values, the graded persistence diagram takes values of 0, 1, or -1. The sum of the graded persistence diagrams is the persistence diagram. We show that the positive and negative points in the k-th graded persistence diagram correspond to the local maxima and minima, respectively, of the k-th persistence landscape. We prove a stability theorem for graded persistence diagrams: the 1-Wasserstein distance between k-th graded persistence diagrams is bounded by twice the 1-Wasserstein distance between the corresponding persistence diagrams, and this bound is attained. In the other direction, the 1-Wasserstein distance is a lower bound for the sum of the 1-Wasserstein distances between the k-th graded persistence diagrams. In fact, the 1-Wasserstein distance for graded persistence diagrams is more discriminative than the 1-Wasserstein distance for the corresponding persistence diagrams.
The classical persistence algorithm virtually computes the unique decomposition of a persistence module implicitly given by an input simplicial filtration. Based on matrix reduction, this algorithm is a cornerstone of the emergent area of topological data analysis. Its input is a simplicial filtration defined over the integers $mathbb{Z}$ giving rise to a $1$-parameter persistence module. It has been recognized that multi-parameter version of persistence modules given by simplicial filtrations over $d$-dimensional integer grids $mathbb{Z}^d$ is equally or perhaps more important in data science applications. However, in the multi-parameter setting, one of the main challenges is that topological summaries based on algebraic structure such as decompositions and bottleneck distances cannot be as efficiently computed as in the $1$-parameter case because there is no known extension of the persistence algorithm to multi-parameter persistence modules. We present an efficient algorithm to compute the unique decomposition of a finitely presented persistence module $M$ defined over the multiparameter $mathbb{Z}^d$.The algorithm first assumes that the module is presented with a set of $N$ generators and relations that are emph{distinctly graded}. Based on a generalized matrix reduction technique it runs in $O(N^{2omega+1})$ time where $omega<2.373$ is the exponent for matrix multiplication. This is much better than the well known algorithm called Meataxe which runs in $tilde{O}(N^{6(d+1)})$ time on such an input. In practice, persistence modules are usually induced by simplicial filtrations. With such an input consisting of $n$ simplices, our algorithm runs in $O(n^{2omega+1})$ time for $d=2$ and in $O(n^{d(2omega + 1)})$ time for $d>2$.
The notion of persistence partial matching, as a generalization of partial matchings between persistence modules, is introduced. We study how to obtain a persistence partial matching $mathcal{G}_f$, and a partial matching $mathcal{M}_f$, induced by a morphism $f$ between persistence modules, both being linear with respect to direct sums of morphisms. Some of their properties are also provided, including their stability after a perturbation of the morphism $f$, and their relationship with other induced partial matchings already defined in TDA.
We give an alternative treatment of the foundations of parametrized spectra, with an eye toward applications in fixed-point theory. We cover most of the central results from the book of May and Sigurdsson, sometimes with weaker hypotheses, and give a new construction of the bicategory $mathcal Ex$ of parametrized spectra. We also give a careful account of coherence results at the level of homotopy categories. The potential audience for this work may extend outside the boundaries of modern homotopy theory, so our treatment is structured to use as little technology as possible. In particular, many of the results are stated without using model categories. We also illustrate some applications to fixed-point theory.