Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userOn the H-Free Extension Complexity of the TSP
121
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Hans Raj Tiwary
Publication date
2015
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
It is known that the extension complexity of the TSP polytope for the complete graph $K_n$ is exponential in $n$ even if the subtour inequalities are excluded. In this article we study the polytopes formed by removing other subsets $mathcal{H}$ of facet-defining inequalities of the TSP polytope. In particular, we consider the case when $mathcal{H}$ is either the set of blossom inequalities or the simple comb inequalities. These inequalities are routinely used in cutting plane algorithms for the TSP. We show that the extension complexity remains exponential even if we exclude these inequalities. In addition we show that the extension complexity of polytope formed by all comb inequalities is exponential. For our proofs, we introduce a subclass of comb inequalities, called $(h,t)$-uniform inequalities, which may be of independent interest.
rate research
Read More
The question if a given partial solution to a problem can be extended reasonably occurs in many algorithmic approaches for optimization problems. For instance, when enumerating minimal dominating sets of a graph $G=(V,E)$, one usually arrives at the problem to decide for a vertex set $U subseteq V$, if there exists a textit{minimal} dominating set $S$ with $Usubseteq S$. We propose a general, partial-order based formulation of such extension problems and study a number of specific problems which can be expressed in this framework. Possibly contradicting intuition, these problems tend to be NP-hard, even for problems where the underlying optimisation problem can be solved in polynomial time. This raises the question of how fixing a partial solution causes this increase in difficulty. In this regard, we study the parameterised complexity of extension problems with respect to parameters related to the partial solution, as well as the optimality of simple exact algorithms under the Exponential-Time Hypothesis. All complexity considerations are also carried out in very restricted scenarios, be it degree restrictions or topological restrictions (planarity) for graph problems or the size of the given partition for the considered extension variant of Bin Packing.
In this article we undertake a study of extension complexity from the perspective of formal languages. We define a natural way to associate a family of polytopes with binary languages. This allows us to define the notion of extension complexity of formal languages. We prove several closure properties of languages admitting compact extended formulations. Furthermore, we give a sufficient machine characterization of compact languages. We demonstrate the utility of this machine characterization by obtaining upper bounds for polytopes for problems in nondeterministic logspace; lower bounds in streaming models; and upper bounds on extension complexities of several polytopes.
In this paper we propose a generalization of the extension complexity of a polyhedron $Q$. On the one hand it is general enough so that all problems in $P$ can be formulated as linear programs with polynomial size extension complexity. On the other hand it still allows non-polynomial lower bounds to be proved for $NP$-hard problems independently of whether or not $P=NP$. The generalization, called $H$-free extension complexity, allows for a set of valid inequalities $H$ to be excluded in computing the extension complexity of $Q$. We give results on the $H$-free extension complexity of hard matching problems (when $H$ are the odd set inequalities) and the traveling salesman problem (when $H$ are the subtour elimination constraints).
Let $G$ be a graph on $n$ vertices and $mathrm{STAB}_k(G)$ be the convex hull of characteristic vectors of its independent sets of size at most $k$. We study extension complexity of $mathrm{STAB}_k(G)$ with respect to a fixed parameter $k$ (analogously to, e.g., parameterized computational complexity of problems). We show that for graphs $G$ from a class of bounded expansion it holds that $mathrm{xc}(mathrm{STAB}_k(G))leqslant mathcal{O}(f(k)cdot n)$ where the function $f$ depends only on the class. This result can be extended in a simple way to a wide range of similarly defined graph polytopes. In case of general graphs we show that there is {em no function $f$} such that, for all values of the parameter $k$ and for all graphs on $n$ vertices, the extension complexity of $mathrm{STAB}_k(G)$ is at most $f(k)cdot n^{mathcal{O}(1)}.$ While such results are not surprising since it is known that optimizing over $mathrm{STAB}_k(G)$ is $FPT$ for graphs of bounded expansion and $W[1]$-hard in general, they are also not trivial and in both cases stronger than the corresponding computational complexity results.
Linear programming is a powerful method in combinatorial optimization with many applications in theory and practice. For solving a linear program quickly it is desirable to have a formulation of small size for the given problem. A useful approach for this is the construction of an extended formulation, which is a linear program in a higher dimensional space whose projection yields the original linear program. For many problems it is known that a small extended formulation cannot exist. However, most of these problems are either $mathsf{NP}$-hard (like TSP), or only quite complicated polynomial time algorithms are known for them (like for the matching problem). In this work we study the minimum makespan problem on identical machines in which we want to assign a set of $n$ given jobs to $m$ machines in order to minimize the maximum load over the machines. We prove that the canonical formulation for this problem has extension complexity $2^{Omega(n/log n)}$, even if each job has size 1 or 2 and the optimal makespan is 2. This is a case that a trivial greedy algorithm can solve optimally! For the more powerful configuration integer program, we even prove a lower bound of $2^{Omega(n)}$. On the other hand, we show that there is an abstraction of the configuration integer program admitting an extended formulation of size $f(text{opt})cdot text{poly}(n,m)$. In addition, we give an $O(log n)$-approximate integral formulation of polynomial size, even for arbitrary processing times and for the far more general setting of unrelated machines.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
