Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userDoubly robust dose-response estimation for continuous treatments via generalized propensity score augmented outcome regression
124
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Daniel Graham
Publication date
2015
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
This paper constructs a doubly robust estimator for continuous dose-response estimation. An outcome regression model is augmented with a set of inverse generalized propensity score covariates to correct for potential misspecification bias. From the augmented model we can obtain consistent estimates of mean average potential outcomes for distinct strata of the treatment. A polynomial regression is then fitted to these point estimates to derive a Taylor approximation to the continuous dose-response function. The bootstrap is used for variance estimation. Analytical results and simulations show that our approach can provide a good approximation to linear or nonlinear dose-response functions under various sources of misspecification of the outcome regression or propensity score models. Efficiency in finite samples is good relative to minimum variance consistent estimators.
rate research
Read More
The research described herewith is to re-visit the classical doubly robust estimation of average treatment effect by conducting a systematic study on the comparisons, in the sense of asymptotic efficiency, among all possible combinations of the estimated propensity score and outcome regression. To this end, we consider all nine combinations under, respectively, parametric, nonparametric and semiparametric structures. The comparisons provide useful information on when and how to efficiently utilize the model structures in practice. Further, when there is model-misspecification, either propensity score or outcome regression, we also give the corresponding comparisons. Three phenomena are observed. Firstly, when all models are correctly specified, any combination can achieve the same semiparametric efficiency bound, which coincides with the existing results of some combinations. Secondly, when the propensity score is correctly modeled and estimated, but the outcome regression is misspecified parametrically or semiparametrically, the asymptotic variance is always larger than or equal to the semiparametric efficiency bound. Thirdly, in contrast, when the propensity score is misspecified parametrically or semiparametrically, while the outcome regression is correctly modeled and estimated, the asymptotic variance is not necessarily larger than the semiparametric efficiency bound. In some cases, the super-efficiency phenomenon occurs. We also conduct a small numerical study.
In this paper, we apply doubly robust approach to estimate, when some covariates are given, the conditional average treatment effect under parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric structure of the nuisance propensity score and outcome regression models. We then conduct a systematic study on the asymptotic distributions of nine estimators with different combinations of estimated propensity score and outcome regressions. The study covers the asymptotic properties with all models correctly specified; with either propensity score or outcome regressions locally / globally misspecified; and with all models locally / globally misspecified. The asymptotic variances are compared and the asymptotic bias correction under model-misspecification is discussed. The phenomenon that the asymptotic variance, with model-misspecification, could sometimes be even smaller than that with all models correctly specified is explored. We also conduct a numerical study to examine the theoretical results.
In this study, we propose shrinkage methods based on {it generalized ridge regression} (GRR) estimation which is suitable for both multicollinearity and high dimensional problems with small number of samples (large $p$, small $n$). Also, it is obtained theoretical properties of the proposed estimators for Low/High Dimensional cases. Furthermore, the performance of the listed estimators is demonstrated by both simulation studies and real-data analysis, and compare its performance with existing penalty methods. We show that the proposed methods compare well to competing regularization techniques.
Understanding how treatment effects vary on individual characteristics is critical in the contexts of personalized medicine, personalized advertising and policy design. When the characteristics are of practical interest are only a subset of full covariate, non-parametric estimation is often desirable; but few methods are available due to the computational difficult. Existing non-parametric methods such as the inverse probability weighting methods have limitations that hinder their use in many practical settings where the values of propensity scores are close to 0 or 1. We propose the propensity score regression (PSR) that allows the non-parametric estimation of the heterogeneous treatment effects in a wide context. PSR includes two non-parametric regressions in turn, where it first regresses on the propensity scores together with the characteristics of interest, to obtain an intermediate estimate; and then, regress the intermediate estimates on the characteristics of interest only. By including propensity scores as regressors in the non-parametric manner, PSR is capable of substantially easing the computational difficulty while remain (locally) insensitive to any value of propensity scores. We present several appealing properties of PSR, including the consistency and asymptotical normality, and in particular the existence of an explicit variance estimator, from which the analytical behaviour of PSR and its precision can be assessed. Simulation studies indicate that PSR outperform existing methods in varying settings with extreme values of propensity scores. We apply our method to the national 2009 flu survey (NHFS) data to investigate the effects of seasonal influenza vaccination and having paid sick leave across different age groups.
In this paper, we study the properties of robust nonparametric estimation using deep neural networks for regression models with heavy tailed error distributions. We establish the non-asymptotic error bounds for a class of robust nonparametric regression estimators using deep neural networks with ReLU activation under suitable smoothness conditions on the regression function and mild conditions on the error term. In particular, we only assume that the error distribution has a finite p-th moment with p greater than one. We also show that the deep robust regression estimators are able to circumvent the curse of dimensionality when the distribution of the predictor is supported on an approximate lower-dimensional set. An important feature of our error bound is that, for ReLU neural networks with network width and network size (number of parameters) no more than the order of the square of the dimensionality d of the predictor, our excess risk bounds depend sub-linearly on d. Our assumption relaxes the exact manifold support assumption, which could be restrictive and unrealistic in practice. We also relax several crucial assumptions on the data distribution, the target regression function and the neural networks required in the recent literature. Our simulation studies demonstrate that the robust methods can significantly outperform the least squares method when the errors have heavy-tailed distributions and illustrate that the choice of loss function is important in the context of deep nonparametric regression.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
