Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userSatisfiability of Ordering CSPs Above Average
98
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Yury Makarychev
Publication date
2015
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We study the satisfiability of ordering constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) above average. We prove the conjecture of Gutin, van Iersel, Mnich, and Yeo that the satisfiability above average of ordering CSPs of arity $k$ is fixed-parameter tractable for every $k$. Previously, this was only known for $k=2$ and $k=3$. We also generalize this result to more general classes of CSPs, including CSPs with predicates defined by linear inequalities. To obtain our results, we prove a new Bonami-type inequality for the Efron-Stein decomposition. The inequality applies to functions defined on arbitrary product probability spaces. In contrast to other variants of the Bonami Inequality, it does not depend on the mass of the smallest atom in the probability space. We believe that this inequality is of independent interest.
rate research
Read More
Many applications like pointer analysis and incremental compilation require maintaining a topological ordering of the nodes of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) under dynamic updates. All known algorithms for this problem are either only analyzed for worst-case insertion sequences or only evaluated experimentally on random DAGs. We present the first average-case analysis of online topological ordering algorithms. We prove an expected runtime of O(n^2 polylog(n)) under insertion of the edges of a complete DAG in a random order for the algorithms of Alpern et al. (SODA, 1990), Katriel and Bodlaender (TALG, 2006), and Pearce and Kelly (JEA, 2006). This is much less than the best known worst-case bound O(n^{2.75}) for this problem.
We precisely determine the SDP value (equivalently, quantum value) of large random instances of certain kinds of constraint satisfaction problems, ``two-eigenvalue 2CSPs. We show this SDP value coincides with the spectral relaxation value, possibly indicating a computational threshold. Our analysis extends the previously resolved cases of random regular $mathsf{2XOR}$ and $textsf{NAE-3SAT}$, and includes new cases such as random $mathsf{Sort}_4$ (equivalently, $mathsf{CHSH}$) and $mathsf{Forrelation}$ CSPs. Our techniques include new generalizations of the nonbacktracking operator, the Ihara--Bass Formula, and the Friedman/Bordenave proof of Alons Conjecture.
Random constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) are known to exhibit threshold phenomena: given a uniformly random instance of a CSP with $n$ variables and $m$ clauses, there is a value of $m = Omega(n)$ beyond which the CSP will be unsatisfiable with high probability. Strong refutation is the problem of certifying that no variable assignment satisfies more than a constant fraction of clauses; this is the natural algorithmic problem in the unsatisfiable regime (when $m/n = omega(1)$). Intuitively, strong refutation should become easier as the clause density $m/n$ grows, because the contradictions introduced by the random clauses become more locally apparent. For CSPs such as $k$-SAT and $k$-XOR, there is a long-standing gap between the clause density at which efficient strong refutation algorithms are known, $m/n ge widetilde O(n^{k/2-1})$, and the clause density at which instances become unsatisfiable with high probability, $m/n = omega (1)$. In this paper, we give spectral and sum-of-squares algorithms for strongly refuting random $k$-XOR instances with clause density $m/n ge widetilde O(n^{(k/2-1)(1-delta)})$ in time $exp(widetilde O(n^{delta}))$ or in $widetilde O(n^{delta})$ rounds of the sum-of-squares hierarchy, for any $delta in [0,1)$ and any integer $k ge 3$. Our algorithms provide a smooth transition between the clause density at which polynomial-time algorithms are known at $delta = 0$, and brute-force refutation at the satisfiability threshold when $delta = 1$. We also leverage our $k$-XOR results to obtain strong refutation algorithms for SAT (or any other Boolean CSP) at similar clause densities. Our algorithms match the known sum-of-squares lower bounds due to Grigoriev and Schonebeck, up to logarithmic factors. Additionally, we extend our techniques to give new results for certifying upper bounds on the injective tensor norm of random tensors.
There has been a considerable amount of interest in recent years in the problem of workflow satisfiability, which asks whether the existence of constraints in a workflow specification makes it impossible to allocate authorized users to each step in the workflow. Recent developments have seen the workflow satisfiability problem (WSP) studied in the context of workflow specifications in which the set of steps may vary from one instance of the workflow to another. This, in turn, means that some constraints may only apply to certain workflow instances. Inevitably, WSP becomes more complex for such workflow specifications. Other approaches have considered the possibility of associating costs with the violation of `soft constraints and authorizations. Workflow satisfiability in this context becomes a question of minimizing the cost of allocating users to steps in the workflow. In this paper, we introduce new problems, which we believe to be of practical relevance, that combine these approaches. In particular, we consider the question of whether, given a workflow specification with costs and a `budget, all possible workflow instances have an allocation of users to steps that does not exceed the budget. We design a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm to solve this problem parameterized by the total number of steps, release points and xor branchings.
An active topic in the study of random constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) is the geometry of the space of satisfying or almost satisfying assignments as the function of the density, for which a precise landscape of predictions has been made via statistical physics-based heuristics. In parallel, there has been a recent flurry of work on refuting random constraint satisfaction problems, via nailing refutation thresholds for spectral and semidefinite programming-based algorithms, and also on counting solutions to CSPs. Inspired by this, the starting point for our work is the following question: what does the solution space for a random CSP look like to an efficient algorithm? In pursuit of this inquiry, we focus on the following problems about random Boolean CSPs at the densities where they are unsatisfiable but no refutation algorithm is known. 1. Counts. For every Boolean CSP we give algorithms that with high probability certify a subexponential upper bound on the number of solutions. We also give algorithms to certify a bound on the number of large cuts in a Gaussian-weighted graph, and the number of large independent sets in a random $d$-regular graph. 2. Clusters. For Boolean $3$CSPs we give algorithms that with high probability certify an upper bound on the number of clusters of solutions. 3. Balance. We also give algorithms that with high probability certify that there are no unbalanced solutions, i.e., solutions where the fraction of $+1$s deviates significantly from $50%$. Finally, we also provide hardness evidence suggesting that our algorithms for counting are optimal.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
