Do you want to publish a course? Click here

Evolution of the Major Merger Galaxy Pair Fraction at z < 1

189   0   0.0 ( 0 )
 Added by Ryan Keenan
 Publication date 2014
  fields Physics
and research's language is English




Ask ChatGPT about the research

We present a study of the largest available sample of near-infrared selected (i.e., stellar mass selected) dynamically close pairs of galaxies at low redshifts ($z<0.3$). We combine this sample with new estimates of the major-merger pair fraction for stellar mass selected galaxies at $z<0.8$, from the Red Sequence Cluster Survey (RCS1). We construct our low-redshift $K-$band selected sample using photometry from the UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS) and the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) in the $K-$band ($sim 2.2~mu$m). Combined with all available spectroscopy, our $K-$band selected sample contains $sim 250,000$ galaxies and is $> 90%$ spectroscopically complete. The depth and large volume of this sample allow us to investigate the low-redshift pair fraction and merger rate of galaxies over a wide range in $K-$band luminosity. We find the major-merger pair fraction to be flat at $sim 2%$ as a function of $K-$band luminosity for galaxies in the range $10^8 - 10^{12} L_{odot}$, in contrast to recent results from studies in the local group that find a substantially higher low-mass pair fraction. This low-redshift major-merger pair fraction is $sim 40-50%$ higher than previous estimates drawn from $K-$band samples, which were based on 2MASS photometry alone. Combining with the RCS1 sample we find a much flatter evolution ($m = 0.7 pm 0.1$), in the relation $f_{rm{pair}} propto (1+z)^m$, than indicated in many previous studies. These results indicate that a typical $Lsim L^*$ galaxy has undergone $sim 0.2-0.8$ major mergers since $z=1$ (depending on the assumptions of merger timescale and percentage of pairs that actually merge).



rate research

Read More

164 - C. Lopez-Sanjuan 2009
Aims: We study the major merger fraction in a SPITZER/IRAC-selected catalogue in the GOODS-S field up to z ~ 1 for luminosity- and mass-limited samples. Methods: We select disc-disc merger remnants on the basis of morphological asymmetries, and address three main sources of systematic errors: (i) we explicitly apply morphological K-corrections, (ii) we measure asymmetries in galaxies artificially redshifted to z_d = 1.0 to deal with loss of morphological information with redshift, and (iii) we take into account the observational errors in z and A, which tend to overestimate the merger fraction, though use of maximum likelihood techniques. Results: We obtain morphological merger fractions (f_m) below 0.06 up to z ~ 1. Parameterizing the merger fraction evolution with redshift as f_m(z) = f_m(0) (1+z)^m, we find that m = 1.8 +/- 0.5 for M_B <= -20 galaxies, while m = 5.4 +/- 0.4 for M_star >= 10^10 M_Sun galaxies. When we translate our merger fractions to merger rates (R_m), their evolution, parameterized as R_m(z) = R_m(0) (1+z)^n, is quite similar in both cases: n = 3.3 +/- 0.8 and n = 3.5 +/- 0.4, respectively. Conclusions: Our results imply that only ~8% of todays M_star >= 10^10 M_Sun galaxies have undergone a disc-disc major merger since z ~ 1. In addition, ~21% of this mass galaxies at z ~ 1 have undergone one of these mergers since z ~ 1.5. This suggests that disc-disc major mergers are not the dominant process in the evolution of M_star >= 10^10 M_Sun galaxies since z ~ 1, but may be an important process at z > 1.
We measure the merger fraction of massive galaxies using the UltraVISTA/COSMOS $Ks$-band selected catalog, complemented with the deeper, higher resolution 3DHST+CANDELS catalog selected in the HST/WFC3 $H$-band, presenting the largest mass-complete photometric merger sample up to $zsim3$. We find that selecting mergers using the $H_{160}$-band flux ratio leads to an increasing merger fraction with redshift, while selecting mergers using the stellar mass ratio causes a diminishing redshift dependence. Defining major and minor mergers as having stellar mass ratios of 1:1 - 4:1 and 4:1 - 10:1 respectively, the results imply $sim$1 major and $lesssim$1 minor merger for an average massive (log$(M_{star}/M_{odot}) geqslant 10.8$) galaxy during $z=0.1-2.5$. There may be an additional $sim 0.5(0.3)$ major (minor) merger if we use the $H$-band flux ratio selection. The observed amount of major merging alone is sufficient to explain the observed number density evolution for the very massive (log$(M_{star}/M_{odot}) geqslant 11.1$) galaxies. We argue that these very massive galaxies can put on a maximum of $6%$ of stellar mass in addition to major and minor merging, so that their number density evolution remains consistent with observations. The observed number of major and minor mergers can increase the size of a massive quiescent galaxy by a factor of two at most. This amount of merging is enough to bring the compact quiescent galaxies formed at $z>2$ to lie at $1sigma$ below the mean of the stellar mass-size relation as measured in some works (e.g. Newman et al. 2012), but additional mechanisms are needed to fully explain the evolution, and to be consistent with works suggesting stronger evolution (e.g. van der Wel et al. 2014).
141 - Jennifer M. Lotz 2011
Calculating the galaxy merger rate requires both a census of galaxies identified as merger candidates, and a cosmologically-averaged `observability timescale T_obs(z) for identifying galaxy mergers. While many have counted galaxy mergers using a variety of techniques, T_obs(z) for these techniques have been poorly constrained. We address this problem by calibrating three merger rate estimators with a suite of hydrodynamic merger simulations and three galaxy formation models. We estimate T_obs(z) for (1) close galaxy pairs with a range of projected separations, (2) the morphology indicator G-M20, and (3) the morphology indicator asymmetry A. Then we apply these timescales to the observed merger fractions at z < 1.5 from the recent literature. When our physically-motivated timescales are adopted, the observed galaxy merger rates become largely consistent. The remaining differences between the galaxy merger rates are explained by the differences in the range of mass-ratio measured by different techniques and differing parent galaxy selection. The major merger rate per unit co-moving volume for samples selected with constant number density evolves much more strongly with redshift (~ (1+z)^(+3.0 pm 1.1)) than samples selected with constant stellar mass or passively evolving luminosity (~ (1+z)^(+0.1 pm 0.4)). We calculate the minor merger rate (1:4 < M_{sat}/M_{primary} <~ 1:10) by subtracting the major merger rate from close pairs from the `total merger rate determined by G-M20. The implied minor merger rate is ~3 times the major merger rate at z ~ 0.7, and shows little evolution with redshift.
The infrared (IR) emission of M_* galaxies (10^{10.4} < M_{star} < 10^{11.0} M_sun) in galaxy pairs, derived using data obtained in Herschel (PEP/HerMES) and Spitzer (S-COSMOS) surveys, is compared to that of single disk galaxies in well matched control samples to study the cosmic evolution of the star-formation enhancement induced by galaxy-galaxy interaction. Both the mean IR SED and mean IR luminosity of star-forming galaxies (SFGs) in SFG+SFG (S+S) pairs in the redshift bin of 0.6 < z < 1 are consistent with no star-formation enhancement. SFGs in S+S pairs in a lower redshift bin of 0.2 < z < 0.6 show marginal evidence for a weak star-formation enhancement. Together with the significant and strong sSFR enhancement shown by SFGs in a local sample of S+S pairs (obtained using previously published Spitzer observations), our results reveal a trend for the star-formation enhancement in S+S pairs to decrease with increasing redshift. Between z=0 and z=1, this decline of interaction-induced star-formation enhancement occurs in parallel with the dramatic increase (by a factor of ~10) of the sSFR of single SFGs, both can be explained by the higher gas fraction in higher z disks. SFGs in mixed pairs (S+E pairs) do not show any significant star-formation enhancement at any redshift. The difference between SFGs in S+S pairs and in S+E pairs suggests a modulation of the sSFR by the inter-galactic medium IGM in the dark matter halos (DMH) hosting these pairs.
101 - E. Ventou , T. Contini , N. Bouche 2017
We provide, for the first time, robust observational constraints on the galaxy major merger fraction up to $zapprox 6$ using spectroscopic close pair counts. Deep Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) observations in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF) and Hubble Deep Field South (HDF-S) are used to identify 113 secure close pairs of galaxies among a parent sample of 1801 galaxies spread over a large redshift range ($0.2<z<6$) and stellar masses ($10^7-10^{11} M_odot$), thus probing about 12 Gyr of galaxy evolution. Stellar masses are estimated from spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting over the extensive UV-to-NIR HST photometry available in these deep Hubble fields, adding Spitzer IRAC bands to better constrain masses for high-redshift ($zgeqslant 3$) galaxies. These stellar masses are used to isolate a sample of 54 major close pairs with a galaxy mass ratio limit of 1:6. Among this sample, 23 pairs are identified at high redshift ($zgeqslant 3$) through their Ly$alpha$ emission. The sample of major close pairs is divided into five redshift intervals in order to probe the evolution of the merger fraction with cosmic time. Our estimates are in very good agreement with previous close pair counts with a constant increase of the merger fraction up to $zapprox 3$ where it reaches a maximum of 20%. At higher redshift, we show that the fraction slowly decreases down to about 10% at $zapprox6$. The sample is further divided into two ranges of stellar masses using either a constant separation limit of $10^{9.5} M_odot$ or the median value of stellar mass computed in each redshift bin. Overall, the major close pair fraction for low-mass and massive galaxies follows the same trend. These new, homogeneous, and robust estimates of the major merger fraction since $zapprox6$ are in good agreement with recent predictions of cosmological numerical simulations.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا