Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userObserved galaxy number counts on the lightcone up to second order: I. Main result
172
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Daniele Bertacca DR.
Publication date
2014
fields
Physics
and research's language is
English
Authors
Daniele Bertacca
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We present the galaxy number overdensity up to second order in redshift space on cosmological scales for a concordance model. The result contains all general relativistic effects up to second order that arise from observing on the past light cone, including all redshift effects, lensing distortions from convergence and shear, and contributions from velocities, Sachs-Wolfe, integrated SW and time-delay terms. This result will be important for accurate calculation of the bias on estimates of non-Gaussianity and on precision parameter estimates, introduced by nonlinear projection effects.
rate research
Read More
We present a detailed derivation of the observed galaxy number over-density on cosmological scales up to second order in perturbation theory. We include all relativistic effects that arise from observing on the past lightcone. The derivation is in a general gauge, and applies to all dark energy models (including interacting dark energy) and many modified gravity models. The result will be important for accurate cosmological parameter estimation, including non-Gaussianity, since all projection effects need to be taken into account. It also offers the potential for new probes of General Relativity, dark energy and modified gravity. This paper accompanies Paper I which presents the key results for the concordance model in Poisson gauge.
We study up to second order the galaxy number over-density that depends on magnification in redshift space on cosmological scales for a concordance model. The result contains all general relativistic effects up to second order which arise from observing on the past light cone, including all redshift and lensing distortions, contributions from velocities, Sachs-Wolfe, integrated SW and time-delay terms. We find several new terms and contributions that could be potentially important for an accurate calculation of the bias on estimates of non-Gaussianity and on precision parameter estimates.
Next generation surveys will be capable of determining cosmological parameters beyond percent level. To match this precision, theoretical descriptions should look beyond the linear perturbations to approximate the observables in large scale structure. A quantity of interest is the Number density of galaxies detected by our instruments. This has been focus of interest recently, and several efforts have been made to explain relativistic effects theoretically, thereby testing the full theory. However, the results at nonlinear level from previous works are in disagreement. We present a new and independent approach to computing the relativistic galaxy number counts to second order in cosmological perturbation theory. We derive analytical expressions for the full second order relativistic observed redshift, for the angular diameter distance and for the volume spanned by a survey. Finally, we compare our results with previous works which compute the general distance-redshift relation, finding that our result is in agreement at linear order.
The galaxy number density is a key quantity to compare theoretical predictions to the observational data from current and future Large Scale Structure surveys. The precision demanded by these Stage IV surveys requires the use of second order cosmological perturbation theory. Based on the independent calculation published previously, we present the result of the comparison with the results of three other groups at leading order. Overall we find that the differences between the different approaches lie mostly on the definition of certain quantities, where the ambiguity of signs results in the addition of extra terms at second order in perturbation theory.
We derive and test an approximation for the angular power spectrum of galaxy number counts in the flat sky limit. The standard density and redshift space distortion (RSD) terms in the resulting approximation are distinct to the Limber approximation, providing an accurate result for multipoles as low as $ellsimeq10$, where the corresponding Limber approximation is completely inaccurate. At equal redshift the accuracy of the density and RSD (standard) terms is around 0.2% for $z<3$ and 0.5% at $z=5$, even to $ell<50$. At unequal redshifts, if we consider the total power spectrum, the precision is better than 5% only for very small redshift differences, $delta <delta_0 (simeq 3.6times10^{-4}(1+z)^{2.14})$ where the standard terms are well-approximated, or for large enough redshift differences $delta >delta_1 (simeq 0.33(r(z)H(z))/(z+1))$ where the lensing terms dominate. The flat sky expressions for the pure lensing and the lensing-density cross-correlation terms are equivalent to the Limber approximation. For arbitrary redshift differences, the Limber approximation achieves an accuracy of 0.5% (above $ellsimeq 40$ for pure lensing and $ellsimeq 80$ for density-lensing). Besides being very accurate, the flat sky approximation is computationally much simpler and can therefore be very useful for data analysis and forecasts with MCMC methods. This will be particularly crucial for upcoming galaxy surveys that will measure the power spectrum of galaxy number counts.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
