Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userComment on: Comment on Mysterious abrupt carbon-14 increase in coral contributed by a comet Yi Liu et al
95
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
Adrian L. Melott
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Unfortunately, Liu et al. contains a number of errors and omissions which compromise its conclusions. These have to do with the amount of 14C which is necessary to deposit in the atmosphere in order to see a perturbation like that in 774 AD, and the ability of a comet to do so.
rate research
Read More
The CLAS Collaboration provides a comment on the physics interpretation of the results presented in a paper published by M. Amaryan et al. regarding the possible observation of a narrow structure in the mass spectrum of a photoproduction experiment.
We offer a brief response to the criticisms put forward by Cusin et al in arXiv:1811.03582 about our work arXiv:1810.13435 and arXiv:1806.01718, emphasising that none of these criticisms are relevant to our main results.
The claim in ref.1 [M. Conte et al: Stern-Gerlach Force on a Precessing Magnetic Moment, Proceedings of PAC07 (http://cern.ch/AccelConf/p07/PAPER/THPAS105.pdf)] that the Stern-Gerlach force on a charged particle with a magnetic moment causes a change in longitudinal momentum proportional to gamma-squared when it traverses a specially configured localized electromagnetic field, contradicts the prediction based on the established interaction Lagrangian. It is shown that extending the calculation in ref. 1 to include the entire spin motion eliminates the gamma-squared term and thus the inconsistency.
It is shown that the continuum limit of the spin 1/2 Heisenberg XYZ model is far from sufficient for the site number of 16. Therefore, the energy spectrum of the XYZ model obtained by Kolanovic et al. has nothing to do with the massive Thirring model, but it shows only the spectrum of the finite size effects.
In their comment, Poole et al. (2009) aim to show it is highly improbable that the observations described in Chepfer and Noel (2009), and described as NAT-like therein, are produced by Nitric Acid Trihydrate (NAT) particles. In this reply, we attempt to show why there is, in our opinion, too little evidence to reject this interpretation right away.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
