Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userComment on the Paper Stern-Gerlach Force on a Precessing Magnetic Moment by M. Conte et al
131
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Christoph Tschalaer
Publication date
2009
fields
Physics
and research's language is
English
Authors
Christoph Tschalaer
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The claim in ref.1 [M. Conte et al: Stern-Gerlach Force on a Precessing Magnetic Moment, Proceedings of PAC07 (http://cern.ch/AccelConf/p07/PAPER/THPAS105.pdf)] that the Stern-Gerlach force on a charged particle with a magnetic moment causes a change in longitudinal momentum proportional to gamma-squared when it traverses a specially configured localized electromagnetic field, contradicts the prediction based on the established interaction Lagrangian. It is shown that extending the calculation in ref. 1 to include the entire spin motion eliminates the gamma-squared term and thus the inconsistency.
rate research
Read More
The relativistic Lagrangian for a spinning particle in an electromagnetic field is derived from the known Lagrangian in the particles rest frame. The resulting relativistic Stern-Gerlach and Thomas precession forces on the particle are then derived from the Lagrangian in the laboratory frame. In particular, the longitudinal component of this combined Stern-Gerlach-Thomas force does not contain a term proportional to gamma-squared as was claimed in a previous derivation [1].
A recent paper in Sci. Adv. by Miller et al. concludes that GREs do not help predict whether physics grad students will get Ph.D.s. The paper makes numerous elementary statistics errors, including introduction of unnecessary collider-like stratification bias, variance inflation by collinearity and range restriction, omission of needed data (some subsequently provided), a peculiar choice of null hypothesis on subgroups, blurring the distinction between failure to reject a null and accepting a null, and an extraordinary procedure for radically inflating confidence intervals in a figure. Release of results of simpler models, e.g. without unnecessary stratification, would fix some key problems. The paper exhibits exactly the sort of research techniques which we should be teaching students to avoid.
The CLAS Collaboration provides a comment on the physics interpretation of the results presented in a paper published by M. Amaryan et al. regarding the possible observation of a narrow structure in the mass spectrum of a photoproduction experiment.
We describe an interactive computer program that simulates Stern-Gerlach measurements on spin-1/2 and spin-1 particles. The user can design and run experiments involving successive spin measurements, illustrating incompatible observables, interference, and time evolution. The program can be used by students at a variety of levels, from non-science majors in a general interest course to physics majors in an upper-level quantum mechanics course. We give suggested homework exercises using the program at various levels.
This comment is aimed to point out that the recent work due to Kim, et al. in which the clinical and experiential assessment of a brain network model suggests that asymmetry of synchronization suppression is the key mechanism of hysteresis has coupling with our theoretical hysteresis model of unconscious-conscious interconnection based on dynamics on m-adic trees.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
