Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userEffect of core--mantle and tidal torques on Mercurys spin axis orientation
99
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The rotational evolution of Mercurys mantle and its core under conservative and dissipative torques is important for understanding the planets spin state. Dissipation results from tides and viscous, magnetic and topographic core--mantle interactions. The dissipative core--mantle torques take the system to an equilibrium state wherein both spins are fixed in the frame precessing with the orbit, and in which the mantle and core are differentially rotating. This equilibrium exhibits a mantle spin axis that is offset from the Cassini state by larger amounts for weaker core--mantle coupling for all three dissipative core--mantle coupling mechanisms, and the spin axis of the core is separated farther from that of the mantle, leading to larger differential rotation. The relatively strong core--mantle coupling necessary to bring the mantle spin axis to its observed position close to the Cassini state is not obtained by any of the three dissipative core--mantle coupling mechanisms. For a hydrostatic ellipsoidal core--mantle boundary, pressure coupling dominates the dissipative effects on the mantle and core positions, and dissipation together with pressure coupling brings the mantle spin solidly to the Cassini state. The core spin goes to a position displaced from that of the mantle by about 3.55 arcmin nearly in the plane containing the Cassini state. With the maximum viscosity considered of $ usim 15.0,{rm cm^2/s}$ if the coupling is by the circulation through an Ekman boundary layer or $ usim 8.75times 10^5,{rm cm^2/s}$ for purely viscous coupling, the core spin lags the precessing Cassini plane by 23 arcsec, whereas the mantle spin lags by only 0.055 arcsec. Larger, non hydrostatic values of the CMB ellipticity also result in the mantle spin at the Cassini state, but the core spin is moved closer to the mantle spin.
rate research
Read More
Neutrino radiography may provide an alternative tool to study the very deep structures of the Earth. Though these measurements are unable to resolve the fine density layer features, nevertheless the information which can be obtained are independent and complementary to the more conventional seismic studies. The aim of this paper is to assess how well the core and mantle averaged densities can be reconstructed through atmospheric neutrino radiography. We find that about a 2% sensitivity for the mantle and 5% for the core could be achieved for a ten year data taking at an underwater km^3 Neutrino Telescope. This result does not take into account systematics related to the details of the experimental apparatus.
The Earths core formation process has decisive effect in the chemical differentiation between the Earths core and its mantle. Here, we propose a new core formation model which is caused by a special giant impact. This model suggests that the impactors core can be kept intact by its own sticky mantle under appropriate impacting conditions and let it merge into the targets core without contact with the targets mantle. We call this special giant impact that caused the new core formation mode as glue ball impact model (GBI). By simulating hundreds of giant impacts with the sizes from planetesimals to planets, the conditions that can lead to GBI have been found out. If with small impact angle (i.e., less than 20 degree), small impact velocity and small impactors mass but larger than 0.07 Mearth, there is a good chance to produce a GBI at the final stage of the Earths accretion. We find that it will be much easier to have GBIs at the late stage of the Earths accretion rather than at the early stage of it. The GBI model will pose a great challenge to many problems between the equilibrium of Earths core and mantle. It provides an additional source for the excess of highly siderophile elements in the Earths mantle and also brings excessive lithophile elements to the Earths core. The GBI model may shed light on the study of Moon-formation and chemical differentiations of the pro-Earth.
Of the solar systems four terrestrial planets, the origin of Mercury is perhaps the most mysterious. Modern numerical simulations designed to model the dynamics of terrestrial planet formation systematically fail to replicate Mercury; which possesses just 5% the mass of Earth and the highest orbital eccentricity and inclination among the planets. However, Mercurys large iron-rich core and low volatile inventory stand out among the inner planets, and seem to imply a violent collisional origin. Because most algorithms used for simulating terrestrial accretion do not consider the effects of collisional fragmentation, it has been difficult to test these collisional hypotheses within the larger context of planet formation. Here, we analyze a large suite of terrestrial accretion models that account for the fragmentation of colliding bodies. We find that planets with core mass fractions boosted as a result of repeated hit-and-run collisions are produced in 90% of our simulations. While many of these planets are similar to Mercury in mass, they rarely lie on Mercury-like orbits. Furthermore, we perform an additional batch of simulations designed to specifically test the single giant impact origin scenario. We find less than a 1% probability of simultaneously replicating the Mercury-Venus dynamical spacing and the terrestrial systems degree of orbital excitation after such an event. While dynamical models have made great strides in understanding Mars low mass, their inability to form accurate Mercury analogs remains a glaring problem.
The local curvature of the space produced by the Sun causes not only the perihelion precession of Mercurys elliptical orbit, but also the variations of the whole orbit, in comparison with those predicted by the Newtonian theory of gravitation. Calculations show that the gravitational major-axis contraction of the Mercurys elliptical orbit is 1.3 kilometers which can be confirmed by the present astronomical distance measurement technology.
We describe the current state of knowledge about Mercurys interior structure. We review the available observational constraints, including mass, size, density, gravity field, spin state, composition, and tidal response. These data enable the construction of models that represent the distribution of mass inside Mercury. In particular, we infer radial profiles of the pressure, density, and gravity in the core, mantle, and crust. We also examine Mercurys rotational dynamics and the influence of an inner core on the spin state and the determination of the moment of inertia. Finally, we discuss the wide-ranging implications of Mercurys internal structure on its thermal evolution, surface geology, capture in a unique spin-orbit resonance, and magnetic field generation.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
