Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userFacebook and the Epistemic Logic of Friendship
175
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Burkhard C. Schipper
Publication date
2013
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
This paper presents a two-dimensional modal logic for reasoning about the changing patterns of knowledge and social relationships in networks organised on the basis of a symmetric friendship relation, providing a precise language for exploring logic in the community [11]. Agents are placed in the model, allowing us to express such indexical facts as I am your friend and You, my friends, are in danger. The technical framework for this work is general dynamic dynamic logic (GDDL) [4], which provides a general method for extending modal logics with dynamic operators for reasoning about a wide range of model-transformations, starting with those definable in propositional dynamic logic (PDL) and extended to allow for the more subtle operators involved in, for example, private communication, as represented in dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) and related systems. We provide a hands-on introduction to GDDL, introducing elements of the formalism as we go, but leave the reader to consult [4] for technical details. Instead, the purpose of this paper is to investigate a number of conceptual issues that arise when considering communication between agents in such networks, both from one agent to another, and broadcasts to socially-defined groups of agents, such as the group of my friends.
rate research
Read More
We introduce a modal logic for describing statistical knowledge, which we call statistical epistemic logic. We propose a Kripke model dealing with probability distributions and stochastic assignments, and show a stochastic semantics for the logic. To our knowledge, this is the first semantics for modal logic that can express the statistical knowledge dependent on non-deterministic inputs and the statistical significance of observed results. By using statistical epistemic logic, we express a notion of statistical secrecy with a confidence level. We also show that this logic is useful to formalize statistical hypothesis testing and differential privacy in a simple and abstract manner.
This paper revisits the multi-agent epistemic logic presented in [10], where agents and sets of agents are replaced by abstract, intensional names. We make three contributions. First, we study its model theory, providing adequate notions of bisimulation and frame morphisms, and use them to study the logics expressive power and definability. Second, we show that the logic has a natural neighborhood semantics, which in turn allows to show that the axiomatization in [10] does not rely on possibly controversial introspective properties of knowledge. Finally, we extend the logic with common and distributed knowledge operators, and provide a sound and complete axiomatization for each of these extensions. These results together put the original epistemic logic with names in a more modern context and opens the door for a logical analysis of epistemic phenomena where group membership is uncertain or variable.
The paper analyzes dynamic epistemic logic from a topological perspective. The main contribution consists of a framework in which dynamic epistemic logic satisfies the requirements for being a topological dynamical system thus interfacing discrete dynamic logics with continuous mappings of dynamical systems. The setting is based on a notion of logical convergence, demonstratively equivalent with convergence in Stone topology. Presented is a flexible, parametrized family of metrics inducing the latter, used as an analytical aid. We show maps induced by action model transformations continuous with respect to the Stone topology and present results on the recurrent behavior of said maps.
Coalition logic is one of the most popular logics for multi-agent systems. While epistemic extensions of coalition logic have received much attention, existence of their complete axiomatisations has so far been an open problem. In this paper we settle several of those problems. We prove completeness for epistemic coalition logic with common knowledge, with distributed knowledge, and with both common and distributed knowledge, respectively.
In this paper we study the solvability of the equality negation task in a simple wait-free model where processes communicate by reading and writing shared variables or exchanging messages. In this task, two processes start with a private input value in the set {0,1,2}, and after communicating, each one must decide a binary output value, so that the outputs of the processes are the same if and only if the input values of the processes are different. This task is already known to be unsolvable; our goal here is to prove this result using the dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) approach introduced by Goubault, Ledent and Rajsbaum in GandALF 2018. We show that in fact, there is no epistemic logic formula that explains why the task is unsolvable. We fix this issue by extending the language of our DEL framework, which allows us to construct such a formula, and discuss its utility.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
