Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userIdentifying conserved protein complexes between species by constructing interolog networks
175
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Sriganesh Srihari Dr
Publication date
2013
fields
Biology
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Protein complexes conserved across species indicate processes that are core to cellular machinery (e.g. cell-cycle or DNA damage-repair complexes conserved across human and yeast). While numerous computational methods have been devised to identify complexes from the protein interaction (PPI) networks of individual species, these are severely limited by noise and errors (false positives) in currently available datasets. Our analysis using human and yeast PPI networks revealed that these methods missed several important complexes including those conserved between the two species (e.g. the MLH1-MSH2-PMS2-PCNA mismatch-repair complex). Here, we note that much of the functionalities of yeast complexes have been conserved in human complexes not only through sequence conservation of proteins but also of critical functional domains. Therefore, integrating information of domain conservation might throw further light on conservation patterns between yeast and human complexes.
rate research
Read More
The recognition of essential proteins not only can help to understand the mechanism of cell operation, but also help to study the mechanism of biological evolution. At present, many scholars have been discovering essential proteins according to the topological structure of protein network and complexes. While some proteins still can not be recognized. In this paper, we proposed two new methods complex degree centrality (CDC) and complex in-degree and betweenness definition (CIBD) which integrate the local character of protein complexes and topological properties to determine the essentiality of proteins. First, we give the definitions of complex average centrality (CAC) and complex hybrid centrality (CHC) which both describe the properties of protein complexes. Then we propose these new methods CDC and CIBD based on CAC and CHC definitions. In order to access these two methods, different Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) networks of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DIP, MIPS and YMBD are used as experimental materials. Experimental results in networks show that the methods of CDC and CIBD can help to improve the precision of predicting essential proteins.
Are turn-on and turn-off functions in protein-protein interaction networks exact opposites of each other? To answer this question, we implement a minimal model for the evolution of functional protein-interaction networks using a sequence-based mutational algorithm, and apply the model to study neutral drift in networks that yield oscillatory dynamics. We study the roles of activators and deactivators, two core components of oscillatory protein interaction networks, and find a striking asymmetry in the roles of activating and deactivating proteins, where activating proteins tend to be synergistic and deactivating proteins tend to be competitive.
Proteins are an important class of biomolecules that serve as essential building blocks of the cells. Their three-dimensional structures are responsible for their functions. In this thesis we have investigated the protein structures using a network theoretical approach. While doing so we used a coarse-grained method, viz., complex network analysis. We model protein structures at two length scales as Protein Contact Networks (PCN) and as Long-range Interaction Networks (LINs). We found that proteins by virtue of being characterised by high amount of clustering, are small-world networks. Apart from the small-world nature, we found that proteins have another general property, viz., assortativity. This is an interesting and exceptional finding as all other complex networks (except for social networks) are known to be disassortative. Importantly, we could identify one of the major topological determinant of assortativity by building appropriate controls.
The degree distribution of many biological and technological networks has been described as a power-law distribution. While the degree distribution does not capture all aspects of a network, it has often been suggested that its functional form contains important clues as to underlying evolutionary processes that have shaped the network. Generally, the functional form for the degree distribution has been determined in an ad-hoc fashion, with clear power-law like behaviour often only extending over a limited range of connectivities. Here we apply formal model selection techniques to decide which probability distribution best describes the degree distributions of protein interaction networks. Contrary to previous studies this well defined approach suggests that the degree distribution of many molecular networks is often better described by distributions other than the popular power-law distribution. This, in turn, suggests that simple, if elegant, models may not necessarily help in the quantitative understanding of complex biological processes.
We consider multi-chain protein native structures and propose a criterion that determines whether two chains in the system are entangled or not. The criterion is based on the behavior observed by pulling at both temini of each chain simultaneously in the two chains. We have identified about 900 entangled systems in the Protein Data Bank and provided a more detailed analysis for several of them. We argue that entanglement enhances the thermodynamic stability of the system but it may have other functions: burying the hydrophobic residues at the interface, and increasing the DNA or RNA binding area. We also study the folding and stretching properties of the knotted dimeric proteins MJ0366, YibK and bacteriophytochrome. These proteins have been studied theoretically in their monomer
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
