Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userIs there an inertia due to the supersymmetry
341
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
Gagik Ter-Kazarian
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We derive a standard Lorentz code (SLC) of motion by exploring rigid double transformations of, so-called, master space-induced supersymmetry (MS-SUSY), subject to certain rules. The renormalizable and actually finite flat-space field theories with $N_{max}=4$ supersymmetries in four dimensions, if only such symmetries are fundamental to nature, yield the possible extension of Lorentz code (ELC), at which the SLC violating new physics appears. In the framework of local MS-SUSY, we address the inertial effects. We argue that a space-time deformation of MS is the origin of inertia effects that can be observed by us. We go beyond the hypothesis of locality. This allows to improve the relevant geometrical structures referred to the noninertial frame in Minkowski space for an arbitrary velocities and characteristic acceleration lengths. This framework furnishes justification for the introduction of the weak principle of equivalence, i.e., the universality of free fall. The implications of the inertia effects in the more general post-Riemannian geometry are briefly discussed.
rate research
Read More
Here we explore the possibility of a lower limit to velocity or velocity change which is 20 orders of magnitude smaller than the speed of light and explore the various observable signatures including those in cosmic rays and gamma ray bursts.
We are used to the fact that most if not all physical theories are based on the set of real numbers (or another associative division algebra). These all have a cardinality larger than that of the natural numbers, i.e. form a continuum. It is often asked, whether there really is a continuum in the physical world, or whether a future physical theory could work with just countable infinities. The latter could for example be compatible with a quantized space-time. In this paper we formulate a simple model of the brain and show that within the presented natural assumptions, the continuum has to exist for at least some physical quantities.
Entanglement has long stood as one of the characteristic features of quantum mechanics, yet recent developments have emphasized the importance of quantumness beyond entanglement for quantum foundations and technologies. We demonstrate that entanglement cannot entirely capture the worst-case sensitivity in quantum interferometry, when quantum probes are used to estimate the phase imprinted by a Hamiltonian, with fixed energy levels but variable eigenbasis, acting on one arm of an interferometer. This is shown by defining a bipartite entanglement monotone tailored to this interferometric setting and proving that it never exceeds the so-called interferometric power, a quantity which relies on more general quantum correlations beyond entanglement and captures the relevant resource. We then prove that the interferometric power can never increase when local commutativity-preserving operations are applied to qubit probes, an important step to validate such a quantity as a genuine quantum correlations monotone. These findings are accompanied by a room-temperature nuclear magnetic resonance experimental investigation, in which two-qubit states with extremal (maximal and minimal) interferometric power at fixed entanglement are produced and characterized.
According to the Particle Data Group, the measurements of ${cal B}(W^+ to tau^+ u_tau)$ and ${cal B}(W^+ to ell^+ u_ell)$ ($ell = e,mu$) disagree with one another at the $2.3sigma$ level. In this paper, we search for a new-physics (NP) explanation of this $W to tau u$ puzzle. We consider two NP scenarios: (i) the $W$ mixes with a $W$ boson that couples preferentially to the third generation, (ii) $tau_{L,R}$ and $ u_{tau L}$ mix with isospin-triplet leptons. Unfortunately, once other experimental constraints are taken into account, neither scenario can explain the above experimental result. Our conclusion is that the $W to tau u$ puzzle is almost certainly just a statistical fluctuation.
We observed two fields near M32 with the ACS/HRC on board the Hubble Space Telescope, located at distances of about 1.8 and 5.4 (hereafter F1 and F2, respectively) from the center of M32. To obtain a very detailed and deep color-magnitude diagram (CMD) and to look for short period variability, we obtained time-series imaging of each field in 32-orbit-long exposures using the F435W (B) and F555W (V) filters, spanning a temporal range of 2 days per filter. We focus on our detection of variability on RR Lyrae variable stars, which represents the only way to obtain information about the presence of a very old population (larger than 10 Gyr) in M32 from optical data. Here we present results obtained from the detection of 31 RR Lyrae in these fields: 17 in F1 and 14 in F2.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
