Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userColoring and Guarding Arrangements
96
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Matias Korman
Publication date
2012
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Given an arrangement of lines in the plane, what is the minimum number $c$ of colors required to color the lines so that no cell of the arrangement is monochromatic? In this paper we give bounds on the number c both for the above question, as well as some of its variations. We redefine these problems as geometric hypergraph coloring problems. If we define $Hlinecell$ as the hypergraph where vertices are lines and edges represent cells of the arrangement, the answer to the above question is equal to the chromatic number of this hypergraph. We prove that this chromatic number is between $Omega (log n / loglog n)$. and $O(sqrt{n})$. Similarly, we give bounds on the minimum size of a subset $S$ of the intersections of the lines in $mathcal{A}$ such that every cell is bounded by at least one of the vertices in $S$. This may be seen as a problem on guarding cells with vertices when the lines act as obstacles. The problem can also be defined as the minimum vertex cover problem in the hypergraph $Hvertexcell$, the vertices of which are the line intersections, and the hyperedges are vertices of a cell. Analogously, we consider the problem of touching the lines with a minimum subset of the cells of the arrangement, which we identify as the minimum vertex cover problem in the $Hcellzone$ hypergraph.
rate research
Read More
An edge guard set of a plane graph $G$ is a subset $Gamma$ of edges of $G$ such that each face of $G$ is incident to an endpoint of an edge in $Gamma$. Such a set is said to guard $G$. We improve the known upper bounds on the number of edges required to guard any $n$-vertex embedded planar graph $G$: 1- We present a simple inductive proof for a theorem of Everett and Rivera-Campo (1997) that $G$ can be guarded with at most $ frac{2n}{5}$ edges, then extend this approach with a deeper analysis to yield an improved bound of $frac{3n}{8}$ edges for any plane graph. 2- We prove that there exists an edge guard set of $G$ with at most $frac{n}{3}+frac{alpha}{9}$ edges, where $alpha$ is the number of quadrilateral faces in $G$. This improves the previous bound of $frac{n}{3} + alpha$ by Bose, Kirkpatrick, and Li (2003). Moreover, if there is no short path between any two quadrilateral faces in $G$, we show that $frac{n}{3}$ edges suffice, removing the dependence on $alpha$.
We provide an O(log log OPT)-approximation algorithm for the problem of guarding a simple polygon with guards on the perimeter. We first design a polynomial-time algorithm for building epsilon-nets of size O(1/epsilon log log 1/epsilon) for the instances of Hitting Set associated with our guarding problem. We then apply the technique of Bronnimann and Goodrich to build an approximation algorithm from this epsilon-net finder. Along with a simple polygon P, our algorithm takes as input a finite set of potential guard locations that must include the polygons vertices. If a finite set of potential guard locations is not specified, e.g. when guards may be placed anywhere on the perimeter, we use a known discretization technique at the cost of making the algorithms running time potentially linear in the ratio between the longest and shortest distances between vertices. Our algorithm is the first to improve upon O(log OPT)-approximation algorithms that use generic net finders for set systems of finite VC-dimension.
The problem of vertex guarding a simple polygon was first studied by Subir K. Ghosh (1987), who presented a polynomial-time $O(log n)$-approximation algorithm for placing as few guards as possible at vertices of a simple $n$-gon $P$, such that every point in $P$ is visible to at least one of the guards. Ghosh also conjectured that this problem admits a polynomial-time algorithm with constant approximation ratio. Due to the centrality of guarding problems in the field of computational geometry, much effort has been invested throughout the years in trying to resolve this conjecture. Despite some progress (surveyed below), the conjecture remains unresolved to date. In this paper, we confirm the conjecture for the important case of weakly visible polygons, by presenting a $(2+varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for guarding such a polygon using vertex guards. A simple polygon $P$ is weakly visible if it has an edge $e$, such that every point in $P$ is visible from some point on $e$. We also present a $(2+varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for guarding a weakly visible polygon $P$, where guards may be placed anywhere on $P$s boundary (except in the interior of the edge $e$). Finally, we present a $3c$-approximation algorithm for vertex guarding a polygon $P$ that is weakly visible from a chord, given a subset $G$ of $P$s vertices that guards $P$s boundary whose size is bounded by $c$ times the size of a minimum such subset. Our algorithms are based on an in-depth analysis of the geometric properties of the regions that remain unguarded after placing guards at the vertices to guard the polygons boundary. It is plausible that our results will enable Bhattacharya et al. to complete their grand attempt to prove the original conjecture, as their approach is based on partitioning the underlying simple polygon into a hierarchy of weakly visible polygons.
In this extended abstract, we present a PTAS for guarding the vertices of a weakly-visible polygon $P$ from a subset of its vertices, or in other words, a PTAS for computing a minimum dominating set of the visibility graph of the vertices of $P$. We then show how to obtain a PTAS for vertex guarding $P$s boundary.
In this paper, we study arrangements of orthogonal circles, that is, arrangements of circles where every pair of circles must either be disjoint or intersect at a right angle. Using geometric arguments, we show that such arrangements have only a linear number of faces. This implies that orthogonal circle intersection graphs have only a linear number of edges. When we restrict ourselves to orthogonal unit circles, the resulting class of intersection graphs is a subclass of penny graphs (that is, contact graphs of unit circles). We show that, similarly to penny graphs, it is NP-hard to recognize orthogonal unit circle intersection graphs.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
