Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userCalculus of generalized hyperbolic tetrahedron
114
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
Ren Guo
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We calculate the Jacobian matrix of the dihedral angles of a generalized hyperbolic tetrahedron as functions of edge lengths and find the complete set of symmetries of this matrix.
rate research
Read More
We prove that every tetrahedron T has a simple, closed quasigeodesic that passes through three vertices of T. Equivalently, every T has a face whose exterior angles are at most pi.
Given a domain $G subsetneq Rn$ we study the quasihyperbolic and the distance ratio metrics of $G$ and their connection to the corresponding metrics of a subdomain $D subset G$. In each case, distances in the subdomain are always larger than in the original domain. Our goal is to show that, in several cases, one can prove a stronger domain monotonicity statement. We also show that under special hypotheses we have inequalities in the opposite direction.
We prove sharp bounds for the product and the sum of the hyperbolic lengths of a pair of hyperbolic adjacent sides of hyperbolic Lambert quadrilaterals in the unit disk. We also show the Holder convexity of the inverse hyperbolic sine function involved in the hyperbolic geometry.
This paper provides upper and lower bounds on the kissing number of congruent radius $r > 0$ spheres in $mathbb{H}^n$, for $ngeq 2$. For that purpose, the kissing number is replaced by the kissing function $kappa(n, r)$ which depends on the radius $r$. After we obtain some theoretical lower and upper bounds for $kappa(n, r)$, we study their asymptotic behaviour and show, in particular, that $lim_{rto infty} frac{log kappa(n,r)}{r} = n-1$. Finally, we compare them with the numeric upper bounds obtained by solving a suitable semidefinite program.
Given a compact connected set $E$ in the unit disk $mathbb{B}^2$, we give a new upper bound for the conformal capacity of the condenser $(mathbb{B}^2, E),$ in terms of the hyperbolic diameter $t$ of $E$. Moreover, for $t>0$ we construct a set of diameter $t$ and show by numerical computation that it has larger capacity than a hyperbolic disk with the same diameter. The set we construct is of constant hyperbolic width equal to $t$, the so called hyperbolic Reuleaux triangle.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
