Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userCoarse Bundles
156
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
Kevin Whyte
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We develop a coarse notion of bundle and use it to understand the coarse geometry of group extensions and, more generally, groups acting on proper metric spaces. The results are particularly sharp for groups acting on (locally finite) trees with Abelian stabilizers, which we are able to classify completely.
rate research
Read More
We construct examples of fibered three-manifolds with first Betti number at least 2 and with fibered faces all of whose monodromies extend to a handlebody.
We determine which three-manifolds are dominated by products. The result is that a closed, oriented, connected three-manifold is dominated by a product if and only if it is finitely covered either by a product or by a connected sum of copies of the product of the two-sphere and the circle. This characterization can also be formulated in terms of Thurston geometries, or in terms of purely algebraic properties of the fundamental group. We also determine which three-manifolds are dominated by non-trivial circle bundles, and which three-manifold groups are presentable by products.
We prove a homological characterization of $Q$-manifolds bundles over $C$-spaces. This provides a partial answer to Question QM22 from cite{w}.
We show that coarse property C is preserved by finite coarse direct products. We also show that the coarse analog of Dydaks countable asymptotic dimension is equivalent to the coarse version of straight finite decomposition complexity and is therefore preserved by direct products.
We generalize Bestvinas notion of a $mathcal{Z}$-boundary for a group to that of a coarse $mathcal{Z}$-boundary. We show that established theorems about $mathcal{Z}$-boundaries carry over nicely to the more general theory, and that some wished-for properties of $mathcal{Z}$-boundaries become theorems when applied to coarse $mathcal{Z}$-boundaries. Most notably, the property of admitting a coarse $mathcal{Z}$-boundary is a pure quasi-isometry invariant. In the process, we streamline both new and existing definitions by introducing the notion of a model $mathcal{Z}$-geometry. In accordance with the existing theory, we also develop an equivariant version of the above -- that of a coarse $Emathcal{Z}$-boundary.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
