Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe Physical Origins of The Morphology-Density Relation: Evidence for Gas Stripping from the SDSS
177
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We provide a physical interpretation and explanation of the morphology-density relation for galaxies, drawing on stellar masses, star formation rates, axis ratios and group halo masses from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We first re-cast the classical morphology-density relation in more quantitative terms, using low star formation rate (quiescence) as a proxy for early-type morphology and dark matter halo mass from a group catalog as a proxy for environmental density: for galaxies of a given stellar mass the quiescent fraction is found to increase with increasing dark matter halo mass. Our novel result is that - at a given stellar mass - quiescent galaxies are significantly flatter in dense environments, implying a higher fraction of disk galaxies. Supposing that the denser environments differ simply by a higher incidence of quiescent disk galaxies that are structurally similar to star-forming disk galaxies of similar mass, explains simultaneously and quantitatively these quiescence -nvironment and shape-environment relations. Our findings add considerable weight to the slow removal of gas as the main physical driver of the morphology-density relation, at the expense of other explanations.
rate research
Read More
Galaxies grow primarily via accretion-driven star formation in discs and merger-driven growth of bulges. These processes are implicit in semi-analytical models of galaxy formation, with bulge growth in particular relating directly to the hierarchical build-up of halos and their galaxies. In this paper, we consider several implementations of two semi-analytical models. Focusing on implementations in which bulges are formed during mergers only, we examine the fractions of elliptical galaxies and both passive and star-forming disk galaxies as functions of stellar and halo mass, for central and satellite systems. This is compared to an observational cross-matched SDSS+RC3 z ~ 0 sample of galaxies with accurate visual morphological classifications and M_{stellar} > 10^10.5 M_{sol}. The models qualitatively reproduce the observed increase of elliptical fraction with stellar mass, and with halo mass for central galaxies, supporting the idea that observed ellipticals form during major mergers. However, the overall elliptical fraction produced by the models is much too high compared with the z ~ 0 data. Since the passive -- i.e. non-star-forming -- fractions are approximately reproduced, and since the fraction which are star-forming disc galaxies is also reproduced, the problem is that the models overproduce ellipticals at the expense of passive S0 and spiral galaxies. Bulge-growth implementations (tuned to reproduce simulations) which allow the survival of residual discs in major mergers still destroy too much of the disc. Increasing the lifetime of satellites, or allowing significant disc regrowth around merger remnants, merely increases the fraction of star-forming disc galaxies. Instead, it seems necessary to reduce the mass ratios of merging galaxies, so that most mergers produce modest bulge growth in disc-galaxy remnants instead of ellipticals. [Abridged]
In light of recent findings from the kinematic morphology-density relation, we investigate whether the same trends exist in the original morphology density relation, using the same data as Dressler. In addition to Dresslers canonical relations, we find that further refinements are possible when considering the average local projected density of galaxies in a cluster. Firstly, the distribution of ellipticals in a cluster depends on the relative local density of galaxies in that cluster: equivalent rises in the elliptical fraction occur at higher local densities for clusters with higher average local densities. This is not true for the late-type fraction, where the variation with local density within a cluster is independent of the average local density of galaxies in that cluster, and is as Dressler originally found. Furthermore, the overall ratio of ellipticals to early-types in a cluster does not depend on the average density of galaxies in that cluster (unlike the ratio of lenticulars to disk systems), and is fixed at around 30%. In the paradigm of fast and slow rotators, we show that such an elliptical fraction in the early-type population is consistent with a slow rotator fraction of 15% in the early-type population, using the statistics of the ATLAS3D survey. We also find the scatter in the overall ratio of ellipticals to early-types is greatest for clusters with lower average densities, such that clusters with the highest elliptical fractions have the lowest average local densities. Finally, we show that average local projected density correlates well with global projected density, but the latter has difficulty in accurately characterising the density of irregular cluster morphologies.
We present an analysis of the z ~ 0 morphology-environment relation for 911 bright (M_B < -19) galaxies, matching classical RC3 morphologies to the SDSS-based group catalog of Yang et al. We study how the relative fractions of spirals, lenticulars, and ellipticals depend on halo mass over a range of 10^11.7-10^14.8 h^-1 Msol. We pay particular attention to how morphology relates to central (most massive) vs satellite galaxy status. The fraction of galaxies which are elliptical is a strong function of stellar mass; it is also a strong function of halo mass, but only for central galaxies. We interpret this in a scenario where elliptical galaxies are formed, probably via mergers, as central galaxies within their halos; satellite ellipticals are previously central galaxies accreted onto larger halos. The overall fraction of S0 galaxies increases strongly with halo mass, from ~10% to ~70%. We find striking differences between the central and satellites: 20+/-2% of central M_* > 10^10.5 Msol galaxies are S0 regardless of halo mass, but satellite S0 galaxies are only found in massive (> 10^13 h^-1 Msol) halos, where they are 69+/-4% of the M_* > 10^10.5 Msol satellite population. This suggests two channels for S0 formation: one for central galaxies, and another which transforms lower mass (M_* <~ 10^11 Msol) accreted spirals into satellite S0 galaxies in massive halos. Analysis of finer morphological structure (bars and rings in disk galaxies) shows some trends with stellar mass, but none with halo mass; this is consistent with other recent studies which indicate that bars are not strongly influenced by galaxy environment. Radio sources in high-mass central galaxies are common, similarly so for elliptical and S0 galaxies, with a frequency that increases with halo mass. Emission-line AGN (mostly LINERs) are more common in S0s, but show no strong environmental trends (abridged).
At $z=0$, higher-spin haloes with masses above $log(text{M}_{text{c}}/h^{-1}text{M}_odot)simeq 11.5$ have a higher bias than lower-spin haloes of the same mass. However, this trend is known to invert below this characteristic crossover mass, $text{M}_{text{c}}$. In this paper, we measure the redshift evolution and scale dependence of halo spin bias at the low-mass end and demonstrate that the inversion of the signal is entirely produced by the effect of splashback haloes. These low-mass haloes tend to live in the vicinity of significantly more massive haloes, thus sharing their large-scale bias properties. We further show that the location of the redshift-dependent crossover mass scale $text{M}_{text{c}}(z)$ is completely determined by the relative abundance of splashbacks in the low- and high-spin subpopulations. Once splashback haloes are removed from the sample, the intrinsic mass dependence of spin bias is recovered. Since splashbacks have been shown to account for some of the assembly bias signal at the low-mass end, our results unveil a specific link between two different secondary bias trends: spin bias and assembly bias.
We apply a stellar population synthesis code to the spectra of a large sample of SDSS galaxies to classify these according to their activity (using emission-line diagnostic diagrams), environment (using catalogues of isolated and cluster galaxies), and using parameters that correlate with their morphology.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
