Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userProperties of Gamma Ray Bursts at different redshifts
138
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Elisabetta Maiorano
Publication date
2009
fields
Physics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
GRBs are now detected up to z = 8.26 . We try to find differences, in their restframe properties, which could be related either to distance or to observing conditions.
rate research
Read More
It is now more than 40 years since the discovery of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and in the last two decades there has been major progress in the observations of bursts, the afterglows and their host galaxies. This recent progress has been fueled by the ability of gamma-ray telescopes to quickly localise GRBs and the rapid follow-up observations with multi-wavelength instruments in space and on the ground. A total of 674 GRBs have been localised to date using the coded aperture masks of the four gamma-ray missions, BeppoSAX, HETE II, INTEGRAL and Swift. As a result there are now high quality observations of more than 100 GRBs, including afterglows and host galaxies, revealing the richness and progress in this field. The observations of GRBs cover more than 20 orders of magnitude in energy, from 10^-5 eV to 10^15 eV and also in two non-electromagnetic channels, neutrinos and gravitational waves. However the continuation of progress relies on space based instruments to detect and rapidly localise GRBs and distribute the coordinates.
The discovery of a number of gamma-ray bursts with duration exceeding 1,000 seconds, in particular the exceptional case of GRB 111209A with a duration of about 25,000 seconds, has opened the question on whether these bursts form a new class of sources, the so called {em ultra-long} GRBs, or if they are rather the tail of the distribution of the standard long GRB duration. In this Letter, using the long GRB sample detected by {em Swift}, we investigate on the statistical properties of ultra-long GRBs and compare them with the overall long burst population. We discuss also on the differences observed in their spectral properties. We find that ultra-long GRBs are statistically different from the standard long GRBs with typical burst duration less than 100-500 seconds, for which a Wolf Rayet star progenitor is usually invoked. We interpret this result as an indication that an alternative scenario has to be found in order to explain the ultra-long GRB extreme energetics, as well as the mass reservoir and its size that can feed the central engine for such a long time.
The Fermi GBM Catalog has been recently published. Previous classification analyses of the BATSE, RHESSI, BeppoSAX, and Swift databases found three types of gamma-ray bursts. Now we analyzed the GBM catalog to classify the GRBs. PCA and Multiclustering analysis revealed three groups. Validation of these groups, in terms of the observed variables, shows that one of the groups coincides with the short GRBs. The other two groups split the long class into a bright and dim part, as defined by the peak flux. Additional analysis is needed to determine whether this splitting is only a mathematical byproduct of the analysis or has some real physical meaning.
We present optical, near-IR, and radio follow up of sixteen Swift bursts, including our discovery of nine afterglows and a redshift determination for three. These observations, supplemented by data from the literature, provide an afterglow recovery rate of 60% in the optical/near-IR, much higher than in previous missions (BeppoSAX, HETE-2, INTEGRAL, and IPN). The optical/near-IR afterglows of Swift events are on average 1.7 mag fainter at t=12 hr than those of previous missions. The X-ray afterglows are similarly fainter compared to those of pre-Swift bursts. In the radio the limiting factor is the VLA threshold and the detection rate for Swift bursts is similar to that for past missions. The redshift distribution of pre-Swift bursts peaked at z~1, whereas the five Swift bursts with measured redshifts are distributed evenly between 1.3 and 3.2. From these results we conclude that (i) the pre-Swift distributions were biased in favor of bright events and low redshift events, (ii) the higher sensitivity and accurate positions of Swift result in a better representation of the true burst redshift and brightness distributions (which are higher and dimmer, respectively), and (iii) as many as 1/3 of the bursts can be optically dark, as a result of a high redshift and/or dust extinction. We remark that the apparent lack of low redshift, low luminosity Swift bursts, and the lower event rate compared to pre-launch estimates (90 vs. 150 per year), are the result of a threshold that is similar to that of BATSE. In view of these inferences, afterglow observers may find it advisable to make significant changes in follow up strategies of Swift events. [abridged]
There exists an inevitable scatter in intrinsic luminosity of Gamma Ray Bursts(GRBs). If there is relativistic beaming in the source, viewing angle variation necessarily introduces variation in the intrinsic luminosity function(ILF). Scatter in the ILF can cause a selection bias where distant sources that are detected have a larger median luminosity than those detected close by. Median luminosity, as we know, divides any given population into equal halves. When the functional form of a distribution is unknown, it can be a more robust diagnostic than any that use trial functional forms. In this work we employ a statistical test based on median luminosity and apply it to test a class of models for GRBs. We assume that the GRB jet has a finite opening angle and that the orientation of the GRB jet is random relative to the observer. We parameterize the jet with constant Lorentz factor $Gamma$ and opening angle $theta_0$. We calculate $L_{median}$ as a function of redshift with an average of 17 grbs in each redshift bin($dz=0.01$) empirically, theoretically and use Fermi GBM data, noting that SWIFT data is problematic as it is biased, specially at high redshifts. We find that $L_{median}$ is close to $L_{max}$ for sufficiently extended GRB jet and does not fit the data. We find an acceptable fit with the data when $Gamma$ is between $100$ and $200$, $theta_0leq 0.1$, provided that the jet material along the line of sight to the on axis observer is optically thick, such that the shielded maximum luminosity is well below the bare $L_{max}$. If we associate an on-axis observer with a classically projected monotonically decreasing afterglow, we find that their ILF is similar to those of off-jet observer which we associate with flat phase afterglows.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
