Recent research has documented that results reported in frequently-cited authorship attribution papers are difficult to reproduce. Inaccessible code and data are often proposed as factors which block successful reproductions. Even when original mater
ials are available, problems remain which prevent researchers from comparing the effectiveness of different methods. To solve the remaining problems---the lack of fixed test sets and the use of inappropriately homogeneous corpora---our paper contributes materials for five closed-set authorship identification experiments. The five experiments feature texts from 106 distinct authors. Experiments involve a range of contemporary non-fiction American English prose. These experiments provide the foundation for comparable and reproducible authorship attribution research involving contemporary writing.
