ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Clinical trials predicate subject eligibility on a diversity of criteria ranging from patient demographics to food allergies. Trials post their requirements as semantically complex, unstructured free-text. Formalizing trial criteria to a computer-interpretable syntax would facilitate eligibility determination. In this paper, we investigate an information extraction (IE) approach for grounding criteria from trials in ClinicalTrials(dot)gov to a shared knowledge base. We frame the problem as a novel knowledge base population task, and implement a solution combining machine learning and context free grammar. To our knowledge, this work is the first criteria extraction system to apply attention-based conditional random field architecture for named entity recognition (NER), and word2vec embedding clustering for named entity linking (NEL). We release the resources and core components of our system on GitHub at https://github.com/facebookresearch/Clinical-Trial-Parser. Finally, we report our per module and end to end performances; we conclude that our system is competitive with Criteria2Query, which we view as the current state-of-the-art in criteria extraction.
The Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model has achieved the state-of-the-art performance for many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Yet, limited research has been contributed to studying its effectiveness when the
Clinical trials provide essential guidance for practicing Evidence-Based Medicine, though often accompanying with unendurable costs and risks. To optimize the design of clinical trials, we introduce a novel Clinical Trial Result Prediction (CTRP) tas
FDA has been promoting enrollment practices that could enhance the diversity of clinical trial populations, through broadening eligibility criteria. However, how to broaden eligibility remains a significant challenge. We propose an AI approach to Coh
The best evidence concerning comparative treatment effectiveness comes from clinical trials, the results of which are reported in unstructured articles. Medical experts must manually extract information from articles to inform decision-making, which
Clinical case reports are written descriptions of the unique aspects of a particular clinical case, playing an essential role in sharing clinical experiences about atypical disease phenotypes and new therapies. However, to our knowledge, there has be