اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدEpistemic stances toward group work in learning physics: Interactions between epistemology and social dynamics in a collaborative problem solving context
78
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
As educators we often ask our physics students to work in groups---on tutorials, during in-class discussions, and on homework, projects, or exams. Researchers have documented the benefits of group work for students conceptual mastery and problem solving skills, and have worked to optimize the productivity of group work by assigning roles and composing groups based on performance levels or gender. However, it is less common for us as a physics education research community to attend to the social dynamics and interactions among students within a collaborative setting, or to address students views about group work. In this paper, we define textit{epistemic stances toward group work}: stances towards what it means to generate and apply knowledge in a group. Through a case study analysis of a collaborative problem solving session among four physics students, we investigate how epistemic stances toward group work interact with social dynamics. We find that misalignment of stances between students can inform, and be informed by, the social positioning of group members. Understanding these fine-grained interactions is one way to begin to understand how to support students in engaging in productive and equitable group work.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
This paper describes our large reformed introductory physics course at UC Davis, which bioscience students have been taking since 1996. The central feature of this course is a focus on sense-making by the students during the five hours per week discu
ssion/labs in which the students take part in activities emphasizing peer-peer discussions, argumentation, and presentations of ideas. The course differs in many fundamental ways from traditionally taught introductory physics courses. After discussing the unique features of CLASP and its implementation at UC Davis, various student outcome measures are presented showing increased performance by students who took the CLASP course compared to students who took a traditionally taught introductory physics course. Measures we use include upper-division GPAs, MCAT scores, FCI gains, and MPEX-II scores.
Interactional synchrony refers to how the speech or behavior of two or more people involved in a conversation become more finely synchronized with each other, and they can appear to behave almost in direct response to one another. Studies have shown
that interactional synchrony is a hallmark of relationships, and is produced as a result of rapport. %Research has also shown that up to two-thirds of human communication occurs via nonverbal channels such as gestures (or body movements), facial expressions, etc. In this work, we use computer vision based methods to extract nonverbal cues, specifically from the face, and develop a model to measure interactional synchrony based on those cues. This paper illustrates a novel method of constructing a dynamic deep neural architecture, specifically made up of intermediary long short-term memory networks (LSTMs), useful for learning and predicting the extent of synchrony between two or more processes, by emulating the nonlinear dependencies between them. On a synthetic dataset, where pairs of sequences were generated from a Gaussian process with known covariates, the architecture could successfully determine the covariance values of the generating process within an error of 0.5% when tested on 100 pairs of interacting signals. On a real-life dataset involving groups of three people, the model successfully estimated the extent of synchrony of each group on a scale of 1 to 5, with an overall prediction mean of $2.96%$ error when performing 5-fold validation, as compared to 26.1% on the random permutations serving as the control baseline.
Four sections of introductory physics for physical scientists and engineers (about 180 students each) are compared. One section, treatment group, was organized so that students worked to learn the classical ideas connecting forces and motion over the
first 6 weeks of the 10 week quarter and then used the final 4 weeks to apply those principles to algebraically complicated problems. The other sections learned ideas at essentially the same time as calculations over the entire 10 weeks of the quarter. The treatment group and one of the control sections were taught by the same instructor, had identical curricular materials and this instructor was blind to the comparison measure, the final exam. After controlling for GPA as well as for incoming conceptual understanding, the treatment group was found (with greater than 99% confidence) to perform better on the final exam than the control group taught by the same instructor and, by a similar measure, the treatment group performed significantly better than any other section. The treatment group also had higher conceptual learning gains and so should be better prepared for later learning.
In this study, we explored the extent to which problems and instructional strategies affect social cohesion and interactions for information seeking in physics classrooms. Three sections of a mechanics physics course taught at a Chilean University in
Coquimbo were investigated. Each section had a weekly problem-solving session using different sets of well and/or ill-structured problems (i.e., algebra-based and open-ended problems respectively), as well as instructional strategies for guiding the problem-solving sessions. Data was collected on networks of information seeking and perceptions of good physics students, during a problem-solving session. We used social network analysis (SNA) for constructing variables while conducting the study. Results suggest that the teaching and learning strategies to guide problem-solving of well and ill-structured problems yield different levels of social interaction among classmates, and significant levels of activity in seeking out information for learning and problem-solving. While strategies for guiding problem-solving lend to significant differences for network connectivity, well and ill-structured physics problems predict similar levels of social activity.
We have developed the Physics Inventory of Quantitative Literacy (PIQL) as a tool to measure students quantitative literacy in the context of introductory physics topics. We present the results from various quantitative analyses used to establish the
validity of both the individual items and the PIQL as a whole. We show how examining the results from classical test theory analyses, factor analysis, and item response curves informed decisions regarding the inclusion, removal, or modification of items. We also discuss how the choice to include multiple-choice/multiple-response items has informed both our choices for analyses and the interpretations of their results. We are confident that the most recent version of the PIQL is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring students physics quantitative literacy in calculus-based introductory physics courses at our primary research site. More data are needed to establish its validity for use at other institutions and in other courses.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
